|
User talk:AnulBanul/Archive 1
Welcome!
An invitationThanks for the invitation. I am unable to participate because I am topic banned from all "post-1900 Serbia and Serbs" related articles. All the best.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:53, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Talkback Message added 22:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Hi The talkpage template for WikiProject Republika Srpska was in some aspects broken, so I used the Bosnia and Herzegovina project template and adapted it for the Republika Srpska project. Is there any reason why you want to keep the old one? - Anonimski (talk) 15:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Award
Disambiguation link notification for February 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serzh Sargsyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Communist Party of Armenia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC) Welcome!Բարև հարգելի Աննա ջան: Եթե ինչ որ բանի օգնության կարիք լինի, իմաց տվեք՝ կփորձեմ օգնել ձեզ որպես նոր օգտատերի: --Երևանցի talk 01:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Portal: Republika SrpskaПоздрав. Свака част за прављење портала Република Српска! Само желим да ти кажем да сам ја направио такав на српском и да сам га данас повезао линком са овим на енглеском, па ако ти буде био од користи, слободно се послужи ;) Угањао сам и овдје заставицу да нам ставе на банер за портал. Мени енглески језик баш и није јача страна, али сам вољан да помогнем ако шта буде требало.--Слободни умјетник (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
BilateralSorry, I don't know how to make a map. I've worked on many bilateral articles but haven't seen any make good article status. LibStar (talk) 06:52, 6 March 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 9Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armenia–Serbia relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petrovac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
AnulmanulHi! I see that you sign your posts as "Anulmanul" (like here) with a link to User:Anulmanul, which in turn, redirects to your user page. I just want to tell you that it is not a very good practice. Other people are not aware that your username is actually not Anulmanul, so they may want to wp:ping you using {{ping|Anulmanul}} or similar, but that would not work because there is no user named "Anulmanul". I advice you to change your WP:signature so to display "Anulmanul", but to link to your user page (like [[User:Yerevani Axjik|Anulmanul]] or something similar). That way, everybody will see that your username is Yerevani Axjik, while your signature is Anulmanul. All the best! Vanjagenije (talk) 12:43, 11 March 2015 (UTC) SalmanHi, since there is an enormous amount of work to be done, and I am going on a wiki break, I would prefer you to fail it for the time being. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 09:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Vandalism
Edit war You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Article. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. Incomplete DYK nomination
Your first DYKIt appears that this is your first DYK. I can try to help you. The article you expanded, Armenia–Croatia relations, needs to be included in the DYK sentence. It should be the most important aspect of the sentence. The current DYK sentence (...that a Croat Jesuit Juraj Marinović wrote the first modern history of Armenians in the West?) doesn't show anything about Croatian-Armenian relations. So I think we can make different DYK sentence. For example, Armenia's diplomatic relations with Croatia is represented in Rome, Italy? Also, which one is the Lepis 2008 source? I can't find it. Is it a book? Եթէ ուզում ես հայերէն կառամ խօսամ: Étienne Dolet (talk) 08:27, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
When IPs vandalise articlesSorry coming to you so late, and I just noticed you solved the problem you had with IP in that article. It was clear that the IP was User:The Destroyer Of Nyr evading his block. Next time you face a similar situation, if the user is blocked already, you can report the IP to the blocking admin of the master account, as it is clear case of block evasion. FkpCascais (talk) 14:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC) REVERTING YOUR NATIONALISMYou have violated the three-revert rule, so I will be reporting you.--Sabahudin9 (talk) 05:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 3Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nino Raspudić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zrinjevac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC) Result of your edit warring complaintYerevani Axjik, you are warned per the result of the complaint of edit warring on Bosnian articles. See more details HERE (permanent link). I'm also alerting you (below) about the WP:ARBMAC discretionary sanctions, which apply to Bosnia. It's evident that you have more experience with Wikipedia than the other party but we need to show some patience, even with such things as incorrectly restoring a PROD. Though S. is quite stubborn he has also done some article creation. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:22, 3 April 2015 (UTC) The Balkans are covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBMAC This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.EdJohnston (talk) 17:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC) Any further discussion of the AN3 complaintIf you have anything more to say about the dispute with User:Sabahudin9 that was reported at WP:AN3 please continue at User talk:EdJohnston#Bosnian dispute. EdJohnston (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for April 10Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 10 April 2015 (UTC) MayorsHey since you are also very active in Bosnia-Herzegovina related articles, I was hoping you would help me out with a few articles. I just ran across the List of mayors of Sarajevo page and I've created two wikis for past mayors including Fehim Čurčić, who was mayor in 1914 at the time of the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, and Esad Kulović, mayor during the Bosnian crisis. I'm hoping you can help flesh them out. --Sabahudin9 (talk) 07:50, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
EminaThere is a discussion here that concerns you.--Sabahudin9 (talk) 06:31, 17 April 2015 (UTC) Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Emina (poem). Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 14:15, 17 April 2015 (UTC) (DRN volunteer) (Not watching) This user is vandalizing Armenian wiki pages. I've already had to make a few changes to the Yerevan page. I don't know where to report him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MoravaiDrina (talk • contribs) 15:45, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Armenia–Croatia relations
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC) Discretionary SanctionsThis message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is WP:ARBMAC. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Robert McClenon (talk) 21:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 26 April 2015 (UTC) Think twice as they say..You will be reported should you keep up your flagrant chauvinist pro-Serb POV pushing. I realize that you as a nationalist Armenian sympathise with your religious brethren in the form of Serbs through Orthodox ties and a common hate of Turks and Muslims. I get that, I understand it, I do, but keep it out of Wikipedia or I will act upon it untiringly to put an end to your breaches of every civilized standard of encyclopedic editing. A quick scan through your contribution history turns up heeps of evidence that will not be to your advantage; you might be looking at a topic ban, quite easily. Nearly every single edit related to Bosnia made by you is about undermining, questioning, or otherwise disqualifying Bosnia as a state/country and the Bosniaks as a people/ethnic group, whilst proving the Serbness of everything, and of course that the RS is nothing but a "true country". All of this is so self-evident to the degree that I would think twice before entering a process if I were you. As for the Cyrillic template replaced by you in every single geographical article related to the RS part of Bosnia and Herzegovina, please know that there is a consenus to use the template contested by you exactly for the reasons that the RS is a) not a "Serb country", but also shared by two other equally constitutive peoples and b) Cyrillic is also used as an official alphabet of the Bosnian language. You have been warned, my fair lady. The ball is in your court. 46.239.102.226 (talk) 14:45, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Deletion of referencesWhy do you delete references? Add your content again without deleting sources. --Munja-x86 (talk) 14:44, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
NameHello, out of pure curiosity, you changed your name?? Or are there two of you? :)))) --Oranges Juicy (talk) 11:06, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
Map, regarding BrčkoZdravo! :) I don't intend to comment on specific usages of File:Republika Srpska location map.svg, but I'd suggest that the Brčko District might be better represented with a diagonal stripe pattern (something like this), as it belongs to both entities. On the other hand, it might make the map a bit confusing for the general readership, so I don't know... It's just a suggestion. Vladimir (talk) 17:40, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
DYK for Mostar car bombing
Thank you for your help with DYK Victuallers (talk) 19:10, 13 May 2015 (UTC) Zvornik police station shootingRepublika Srpska is within the framework of the government of BiH in the sense of being an authority. I simply wished to reduce a convoluted section of the article and still feel that this can be done if we say "authorities on all levels". --Oranges Juicy (talk) 06:25, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Serb/SerbianI think that the proper use for Serb minority parties is "Serb" and not "Serbian". However, if the party uses "Serbian" in English, I support moving it to the latter. Their official page is only in Serbian language. These use "Serb Democratic Party":
I think you should revert your moves.--Zoupan 20:16, 21 May 2015 (UTC) Complaint about your edits at WP:AN3See a proposal for two topic bans to deal with this case. You can reply at AN3 if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction The following sanction now applies to you:
You have been sanctioned because of edit warring and POV pushing on Bosnian topics. See the two reports at AN3. This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. EdJohnston (talk) 13:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC) This ban expires on 26 August 2015. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC) :)Violation of your topic ban If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped." Per this edit at User:UBX/User Republika Srpska. The Republika Srpska is a political unit within Bosnia-Herzegovina, so this violates your ban. EdJohnston (talk) 17:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
MentionedYour name was mentioned at User talk:EdJohnston#AnulBanul (Wustenfuchs) topic ban evasion,
June 2015
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:37, 27 June 2015 (UTC) DYK for Bosniac National Council
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:06, 27 June 2015 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Armenia–Serbia relationsHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Armenia–Serbia relations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Armenia–Serbia relationsThe article Armenia–Serbia relations you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Your GA nomination of Armenia–Serbia relationsThe article Armenia–Serbia relations you nominated as a good article has failed Your GA nomination of Armenia–Croatia relationsHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Armenia–Croatia relations you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Armenia–Croatia relationsThe article Armenia–Croatia relations you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Your GA nomination of Armenia–Croatia relationsThe article Armenia–Croatia relations you nominated as a good article has failed Blocked as a sockpuppet
Your GA nomination of Zvornik police station shootingHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zvornik police station shooting you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. MfD nomination of Portal:Republika Srpska
|
