en User talk:Antodav2007

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Antodav2007, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Mysdaao ^talk 19:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of James Potter and the Hall of Elders' Crossing

I have nominated James Potter and the Hall of Elders' Crossing, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Potter and the Hall of Elders' Crossing. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:27, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to World War I appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 08:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Lenerd (talk) 20:43, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your userpage

I've reverted a load of vandalism from an anon IP address; do you have any idea why he/she would be posting "god help me" over and over? Not that their actions normally make sense

If you talk to an admin (I suggest User:Cenarium, he's very approachable and has always been nice to me) and ask them to semi-protect your userpage then IP addresses and new accounts wont be able to edit it. I'd advise that :). In addition, i'll be putting your userpage on my watchlist so that if there's an edit, i'll see it and revert it. Ironho lds 15:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask about your edit to the Spice Girls page? The band are still (unfortunately) around, and a capitalised letter after a full stop is proper punctuation. Ironho lds 15:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and your userpage has been semi-protected :). Didn't know whether you'd checked Cenarium's talk page or not; I used to miss a heck-load of important messages because I assumed they'd reply on mine. If you need any other help with anything, feel free to give me a poke :). Ironho lds 23:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Do not want

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Do not want. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 02:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the text because the article appears to be vandalism. All it does is redirect to the "releases" segment of Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, which makes no sense. As far as I can tell, it's some kind of bad joke by somebody who didn't like the movie. I was trying to figure out how to delete the article entirely but I couldn't figure out how. If there is a way to nominate the article for deletion, please show me. --Antodav2007 (talk) 02:35, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, reading the text of that segment of the article a bit closer I guess it does make sense, although that part of the article could easily qualify as trivia and should by itself be removed. Nevertheless, I'll let it stay. Sorry for the confusion.--Antodav2007 (talk) 02:42, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. You might want to have a look at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion to see how to propose an unwanted redirect for deletion. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 03:24, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will do. --Antodav2007 (talk) 03:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of James Potter and the Hall of Elders' Crossing

I have nominated James Potter and the Hall of Elders' Crossing, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Potter and the Hall of Elders' Crossing (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Smashville^talk 03:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Smashville^talk 03:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki-meetup Nashville on Labor Day weekend!

Orphaned non-free image File:Elderscrossing.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Elderscrossing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Wallflower"

Hi there! Your recent edit to the Fringe episode article "Wallflower" looked good, but unfortunately was not included the citation given. I reverted it. Please use reliable sources next time. I look forward to your continued constructive edits for the series. Always happy to meet a fellow fan! Regards, Ruby 2010/2013 00:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Any cultural references need a reliable source, regardless if it is quoted directly from the episode (otherwise it can be considered original research). Also, the way you put it in made it seem like the EW source was its citation, when it was not. Regards, Ruby 2010/2013 01:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to find a source in an A.V. Club review. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 02:14, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Super Mario Bros. 5

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Super Mario Bros. 5, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TypingInTheSky (talk) 16:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Antodav2007. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Antodav2007. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Antodav2007. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Antodav2007. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]