User talk:Anthony Bradbury/Archive14

Thanks for the review and the kind comments on my admin review page. :) Yes, I do remember briefly opposing your RfA, and remember being convinced to change to support (which I am so glad I did), as well as regretting opposing anyway (I remember my apology too). You did play a huge role in me becoming an admin, and I will never forget everything you did for me. Thank you for your continued support and confidence: it really means a lot to me (oh, and as of the last 4th July, it was my fourth admin anniversary!). Best. Acalamari 21:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor Sharpe Speedy Deletion Questions

Sorry I'm a relatively new user, and I have a question. a couple minutes (seconds?) ago I found in the "Recent Changes" a new topic that was made which turned out to simply be vandalism, so I at first just deleted all the text, but after realizing that didn't get rid of the topic I looked up the wikipedia rules on how to delete a topic and found the header that was to be placed for a "speedy deletion", which apparently worked, as you deleted it. Now my question is: Did I carry out that request for a deletion correctly? Soloman212 + tortoise (talk) 4:21 pm, Today (UTC−5) 16:10, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dispositio Achillea

Your deletion of Dispositio Achillea seems to have been a mistake. Neither of the reasons for deletions given appears to be applicable. It is not a dictionary definition of anything (making it a candidate for Wiktionary) or the original text of a source (making it a candidate for Wikisource) but an article about a mediaeval document of obvious historical significance. Nor was it in a foreign language: the Google cache shows that it was in English. I don't personally care for machine-translations, if that was an issue, but this does not appear to have been one, at least not in its final state.

I suggest that you undelete it. If you were to apologize to the user who made the translation from the German, User talk:HansM, it would probably not go unappreciated. --Hegvald (talk) 10:31, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:26, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Phaedriel

I found myself intrigued and amused by internet trolling as well as the other dark ways. In recent months, I came across an article on ED about Phaedriel. That alone got me riled. I can't figure why trolls targeted her. --Yancyfry (talk)

User talk:Scid and IPBE

Hello Anthony. I'm somewhat confused about your actions regarding the user linked above. I'd taken a look at their situation earlier today with Checkuser, and while the IP address they've recently been using is blocked, it is an anonymous only block that should not be affecting them. IP Block Exemptions are only given on an as-needed basis, so I'm not sure why you chose to grant one after I noted that on the user's talk page. I haven't removed the flag, but I was hoping to get a reply from the user to pinpoint what the problem was - it should not be a block. Hersfold (t/a/c) 03:53, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


feedback about this page

Hi Anthony. You deleted the page because there was not enough content and you were right. I was editing it and saved it not to lose what i was doing Here is my first draft is it ok for you? can i save it?


here it is


CONFERENCE EXPERTS


(talk)

Antony Penrose

Can you please restore the page you deleted on Antony Penrose ? If there are changes that need to be made, please let me know and I'll make them.

Thanks 82.249.232.163 (talk) 11:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Softgenetics

Hello, I would like to know why my Softgenetics page was deleted, given that I have already estabished notability by linking 3 independent papers on Softgenetics products (with their names in the very titles!) on the ncbi website. If ncbi papers don't establish validity, I don't know what does. Although the page was sparse, I was going to add more information. Please respond with what makes proper notability, or I will recreate the page. Given that it was up for only 1 day, I feel that not enough discussion (not at all really) went into the deletion of this article. --Pyrogen53 (talk) 15:06, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MAMEhub

I note that you deleted MAMEhub under the A7 criteria; please note that A7 does not cover software, and a series of web server programs are clearly software. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 23:05, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed; the other admin was also poked, and after inspecting the article has admitted he was mistaken. The G6 deletion was pretty much fine; deletion of a redirect to a non-main namespace has its own heading, but fits under that fine. Ironholds (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MAMEhub

I note that you deleted MAMEhub under the A7 criteria; please note that A7 does not cover software, and a series of web server programs are clearly software. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 23:05, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed; the other admin was also poked, and after inspecting the article has admitted he was mistaken. The G6 deletion was pretty much fine; deletion of a redirect to a non-main namespace has its own heading, but fits under that fine. Ironholds (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you deleted MAMEhub under the A7 criteria; please note that A7 does not cover software, and a series of web server programs are clearly software. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 23:05, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed; the other admin was also poked, and after inspecting the article has admitted he was mistaken. The G6 deletion was pretty much fine; deletion of a redirect to a non-main namespace has its own heading, but fits under that fine. Ironholds (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

oes not cover software, and a series of web server programs are clearly software. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 23:05, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed; the other admin was also poked, and after inspecting the article has admitted he was mistaken. The G6 deletion was pretty much fine; deletion of a redirect to a non-main namespace has its own heading, but fits under that fine. Ironholds (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

k:Ironholds|talk]]) 23:05, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Indeed; the other admin was also poked, and after inspecting the article has admitted he was mistaken. The G6 deletion was pretty much fine; deletion of a redirect to a non-main namespace has its own heading, but fits under that fine. Ironholds (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ironholds|talk]]) 23:05, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Indeed; the other admin was also poked, and after inspecting the article has admitted he was mistaken. The G6 deletion was pretty much fine; deletion of a redirect to a non-main namespace has its own heading, but fits under that fine. Ironholds (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Falling In Reverse: Deletion Review

A new article on a band is up for deletion review here: Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2011_August_5#Falling_In_Reverse|. It seems to me the band now clearly passes WP:Band since it is No 19 in US album charts and so it might be nice if the article could be recreated now. I bring this to you as you deleted an earlier version. Any views? Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 10:11, 6 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rajeev Mohan

Hi Anthony, I wrote my first article on 'Rajeev Mohan' and it was deleted citing A7 and G8. 'Rajeev Mohan' is an Indian actor. There is a Wikipedia link about his latest movie 'Moksha (2011 film)' in which he is cast as the male lead. I was in the process of editing but it was deleted after my second edit. Could you please explain how to improve the article and get it back on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Info.me12 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template talk:Google sucks

I think I adequately addressed the nominators concerns here. Marcus Qwertyus 00:27, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Marcus Qwertyus's talk page.
Message added 02:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Marcus Qwertyus 02:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rajeev Mohan

Hi Anthony, Thanks for your reply. The whole process seems complicated and very technical. But from what i understand, I'll put the 'Rajeev Mohan' page as a sub-page. And keep adding inputs. Then later, after it meets Wikipedia's notability, I'll upload it as a main article. Hope I get it right! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Info.me12 (talk • contribs) 09:28, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Small dispute

Hello, Anthony. The reason I am here is because I am in a little dispute with one of my adoptees, User:Ace10000. He has refused to come back editing because I reverted two of his article edits as good faith. On this talkpage diff, [1], he gives me a rather violent message threatening to make one of his websites bigger than Wikipedia(?) and forgot to sign. So, I thought I'd get an uninvolved admin to come and have a look. WP:THREAT may be at stake here so I thought it best to get someone. Also, it would be a real shame if he got blocked because my previous adoptee vanished and I wouldn't like another one going. Please help soon, Rcsprinter (talk) 14:59, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

jdavie

Hello, in my opinion, it's time to bann jdavie. Regards.Jorgen W (talk) 21:27, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:31, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

to be honest

to be honest as long as its not permanent i don't mind all i ask is that you let me send a message showing how sorry i am to rcsprinter because i dont care about blocks all i care about is that as i call them "the sprinster" will forgive me that is all i ask so block me all you want but it wont compare to the forgiveness — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ace10000 (talk • contribs) 17:10, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Titan's cross nomination

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. I see that you are a member of WP:OMT. I am reminding you that there is a discussion [here] about whther or not to award Bahamut0013, a member of OMt who passsed awsay a short while ago, the Titan's Cross in silver. your opinion will be welcome. Thanks, Buggie111 (talk) 14:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of /a:t/BrE

I noticed you have deleted the page for /a:t/BrE because it refers to a 'company'. This was and still is a performance art group, and we registered it as a company, in a sarcastic gesture: Performance Art has always been considered something resisting commodification and the logic of the market. We registered it to show that it risks such a danger. What we are doing is much more similar to an NGO than a company and it is not fair to be treated as one! We made this wikipage to record part of the history of newly emerging contemporary art of Iran. Performance Art Company is a contradiction in terms, nobody lives by being a performance artist, particularly in Iran. As an art group, I think we deserve to have a wiki-page: a glance at our previous events and achievements reflected in our website will prove this. This can be a great chance for artists marginalized by the crazy regulations of Iranian government, to somehow record their art history! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Behpoor (talk • contribs) 20:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

why have you deleted my page?: Understanding Managed futures: There was no promotion, it was objective and well referenced and linked. What possible advertising or commercial purpose could you see in it. Yes, I posted previously under very similar name, but went aback and r3viewed and edited subject to your guidelines. Be good enough to give me specific answer in order that I do not do all this work with no idea of your reaction again. Thank you.Jackthelad212 (talk) 23:48, 2 October 2011 (UTC) Jackthelad212[reply]

Please join a discussion

Please join a discussion ("Wikipedia and its relationship to the outside world") about medical ELs and related issues. You may want to follow the links provided to learn more if you are so inclined. Thank you in advance. Presto54 (talk) 07:11, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Taurgo's is not me

User Taurgo has been blocked for being a sockpuppet of userid Chanakyathegreat. I would like to inform you that that's not true. I'm the one. Just because someone have a similar opinion on certain matter never means they are the same person. Am I right? Only damn idiots can think otherwise.Growingnuerons (talk) 12:44, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey for new page patrollers

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Anthony Bradbury/Archive14! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mail

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Steven Zhang The clock is ticking.... 22:41, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for a new Civicrazia page

Hi, I am the editor of te Civicrazia article that has been deleted. I really want this Association to have a Wiki page, so could you please give me some practical advice to write it the right way?

Thank you very much P.d.Lucio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paolo Di Lucio (talk • contribs) 10:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrrhus, etc

I’m almost annoyed.
Having spent a fair amount of time trying to sort out the RM here, I was pretty hacked off on finding that it had been moved again, without so much as a by-your-leave; I’m also annoyed that when I queried it, that was ignored too, and the page moves continued regardless.
Anyway, you can read more about it here. Moonraker12 (talk) 21:42, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough; I came across it today, when the talk page was being moved (and was tagged for CSD). I didn’t notice that you’d already moved the article til later. If what you saw was tagged as uncontroversial, then whoever tagged it is at fault: Where the page was was as a result of the RM, so a further move should have been discussed; it could hardly be described as uncontroversial. I think if a move from Cyrrhus, Syria is desired, then whoever wants it needs to make a case, not just presume it’s OK. Moonraker12 (talk) 22:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tricky: it feels disruptive to say move them back, but if you don’t mind doing that, I’ll put a section on the talk page inviting a discussion, and let it work itself out from there. If there’s a good reason for another move, fair enough, but I don’t like the high-handedness of what’s happened today. Moonraker12 (talk) 22:20, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just to follow on; there's been a response at the ANI and it's getting discussd there, so I'm content to leave it at that. But thank you for your responses, Moonraker12 (talk) 12:38, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 07:50, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Specialicious Speedy Block Appeal

I am appealing the deletion of the “Specialicious” page, deleted on November 8, 2011, on the grounds of meeting the G11 and A7 Criteria for Speedy Deletion. I will hereby state the following reasons why “Specialicious” should be unblocked so that the page may be restored, without instigating future reasons for speedy deletion and without violating any of the rules and restrictions set forth by Wikipedia’s administrators:

1. In regards to “Criteria for speedy deletion: A7—No indication of importance,” I plan to indicate in detail why the subject in question (company—Specialicious.com) is significant, and the claim’s credibility will be clear and noticeable to readers. The “Specialicious” page will be informative on many levels; it will contain a detailed account of the company’s history, developments and recent changes within the business model, geographic markets which the company serves, past and current competitors, financial history and a list of credible references.

2. In regards to “Criteria for speedy deletion: G11—Unambiguous advertising or promotion,” I plan to completely rewrite the “Specialicious” page in a fundamental manner so that the page can become encyclopedic. In recreating the “Specialicious” page, a neutral point of view will be maintained throughout, and we will avoid overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources. The page will no longer be exclusively promotional; rather, the page will serve as an educational resource for employees, potential interns and employees, competitors, businesses, clients and customers to find information regarding our mission, history, business model, products, funding and external links.

3. In addition to future adherence to the rules and regulations set forth by Wikipedia’s administrators, I would like to add to this appeal that the original content of the “Specialicious” page was written with insufficient research of Wikipedia’s Criteria for Speedy Deletion and failed to include a detailed account of the subject matter’s history and industrial significance. In recreating the “Specialicious”oldid=119293587#Adminship. my apology] too). You did play a huge role in me becoming an admin, and I will never forget everything you did for me. Thank you for your continued support and confidence: it really means a lot to me (oh, and as of the last 4th July, it was my fourth admin anniversary!). Best. Acalamari 21:02, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Trevor Sharpe Speedy Deletion Questions

Sorry I'm a relatively new user, and I have a question. a couple minutes (seconds?) ago I found in the "Recent Changes" a new topic that was made which turned out to simply be vandalism, so I at first just deleted all the text, but after realizing that didn't get rid of the topic I looked up the wikipedia rules on how to delete a topic and found the header that was to be placed for a "speedy deletion", which apparently worked, as you deleted it. Now my question is: Did I carry out that request for a deletion correctly? Soloman212 page, I plan to utilize Wikipedia’s Criteria for Speedy Deletion as a guideline for appropriately necessary content and include said content. Please email me at jacquelineho88@gmail.com if there are any further steps that will be required to take, besides the steps included in this appeal, that will result in the “Specialicious” account being unblocked.

Re: IP talk pages

It's a certain troll; most of his talk pages have been speedy deleted to deny recognition, although I'll admit the posts from SineBot aren't really that kind of message, although I still stand by by G6'ing of the warned ones. HurricaneFan25 15:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are. I'm not posting the specific troll to deny recognition, but I just sent you an e-mail who. HurricaneFan25 15:35, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: email

Yes, you could well be right. There seems to be a resounding silence, though.... Your other mail isn't forgotten - I'm out of touch with a couple of bookcases at the moment and need to check one or two things before replying. Thanks for the compliment, anyway.... 8-) Peridon (talk) 19:00, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

RFA thanks

Thank you for your comment and support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 22:08, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I'm not planning on sending around thankspam to everyone, but I wanted to thank you for being willing to nominate me. I hope I'll live up to the hype, and I look forward to working alongside the other admins here. See you around! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:14, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adapted military service

===== Regarding : 16:47, 7 December 2011 Anthony Bradbury (talk | contribs) deleted "Adapted military service" ‎ (A1: Not enough context to identify article's subject) =====

Dear Anthony, I'm sorry for this deletion, if my page creation (Adapted military service) was unappropriate. The creation of this page was led by three reasons :

  1. Someone requested the translation on the discussion page of the french article (see the link to see the translation request)
  2. I thought I was the suitable person to provide the translation since I work for the Adapted military service (Paris headquarters)
  3. Actually, I was given the order by the Brigadier general commanding the Adapted military service, who wanted to see how the unit was described on Wikipedia and asked me how to create the english article, and link the french article to the english article. I just obeyed the order.

I'm sorry if my action was unappropriate and would like to ask you what would make this article acceptable : is it a matter of proper categorizing or providing a different writing style ? Respecting the rules and guidelines would help me to fulfill the general's request in cumpliance with the level of quality expected for Wikipedia articles. In advance, I thank you for your help. Best regards, Nairolf FR (talk) 18:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at LadyofShalott's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LadyofShalott 21:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Anthony Bradbury. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

BoogaLouie

I decided to go with just clearing the autoblock because, while the BoogaLouie account has been trouble-free for quite some time, that has not always been the case. With a record that long, I was unsure if IPBE would be acceptable without some consensus. Daniel Case (talk) 23:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perspicacity

The deletion log indicates that you‎ deleted this article for reason (A5: Article that has already been transwikied to another project). This action seems improper in that

  1. The article was not a dictionary definition. Iirc, it was a WP:STUB - a proper start upon an article.
  2. No transwiki action has been taken in respect of it
  3. No author information has been preserved
  4. The author - myself - was not notified

Please restore this article so that I may continue to work upon it, if further expansion seems required. Warden (talk) 23:54, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Bafutia to Bafutia tenuicaulis

Thanks, Anthony Bradbury for deleting the navigation aid which was blocking the technical move under criteria G6 and moving the article which I was requesting for.--Ankit Maity Talk • contribs 11:22, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Omniverse Theory

When I began to create this article, on behalf of its author, Charles Tandy, PHd (aka AvatarEight), there was a notice that you had deleted a previous article with this same title. I would like you to take a quick look at his new article, and see if you have the same objections. Also, is it possible for me to view this previously deleted article somehow, so I can try to avoid the same problems. The new article is at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AvatarEight/Omniverse_Theory

Edgar Swank for Charles Tandy — Preceding unsigned comment added by AvatarEight (talk • contribs) 22:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Links to WikiProjects on Wikipedia page

Quicklinks to WikiProjects(Wiktionary, WikiNews etc) are needed on Wikipedia and vice-versa, in the header or on the left-margin column. Please consider including these to the existing links for the convenience of users navigation from one project to another. Rockin291 (talk) 15:11, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editor for 5 years and Admin for 4 years, that's impressive. And sir, I didn't mean to say that you needed it but sometimes when users need to quickly navigate from Wikipedia to Wiktionary for instance (either editing something or reading articles) it will be convenient to have TransWiki links, what are your thoughts on this? Rockin291 (talk) 05:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if I'm mistaken but do correct me if I am; what I was trying to say is that the side bar of default Wikipedia page for any user or non-user should contain links to sister-projects, so that it would be easier to navigate, and that you, sir, being an administrator can modify existing templates for the sidebar to include these links you know, so that the links appears for all who access Wikipedia and sister-project articles and pages. Rockin291 (talk) 01:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful processing speedy deletions

You deleted Matru ki bijlee ka mandola as A7, even though it named a famous director and two famous actors as leads in the movie. Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wholeheartedly disagree. A7, by its own text, only applies to individuals, animals, organizations, and web content. This is none of those. Even if A7 covered movies (which it doesn't), that would be better for a prod (and even a prod was declined on this article--recreated using different capitalizaion--by another user). A forthcoming film starring famous actors is not something so uncontroversial that it should be deleted without a discussion or a chance for improvement. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:44, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So you believe that A7 applies to movies, despite its text? I also found two more inappropriate deletions, one of a dormitory and one of a skatepark, that you have deleted under A7 inappropriately in the last two days. Unless something is an individual, animal, organization, or web content, it does not qualify for A7. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hahaha I don't think Harvard Law School really qualifies me for this.... I'd just tag these sorts of articles for prod instead, and they will be gone soon enough. (I actually think the movie might be able to withstand a PROD, but that's beside the point. Generally if there's a really bad article I'll just prod it.) I think it's better to do a prod so the article creator doesn't get burned instantly (though I'm not really sure prod is that much better) and so there's a window to improve the article. Speedy deletion is only for junk in certain categories that occur in such volume that it wouldn't be possible to go through those processes... Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Tags

Thanks for the note, it has been, erm noted :). Will start leaving it a bit longer before tagging in future, cheers. GimliDotNet (talk) 07:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to cycling articles

I noticed your message on Ytfc's page. It was probably a mistake on my part, as it relates to this page. Regards. Craig(talk) 20:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I noticed it on Levi Leipheimer, who is due to ride for the team in 2012. The pages themselves should not be up for deletion but I did notice that they were in the category. Basically, it should only be this page that should be deleted, which should hopefully free up this other page to move into OPQ. Hope I cleared that one up. Craig(talk) 20:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Hi,you can help my with article plis,thank Carliitaeliza (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

you can talk spanish?Carliitaeliza (talk) 20:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ok,i understand ,plis sans capital letter,no like me,i want expand te article ,this is article,you live in london[[2]]thank, Carliitaeliza (talk) 21:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seamus (dog)

I strongly disagree with the speedy deletion of the article on 'Seamus (dog)', which was owned by Mitt Romney, and was the subject of a controversial 1983 road trip. There have been hundreds of news articles in the last couples of weeks refering to Seamus, and there were hundred of news articles in 2008 refering to Seamus. The article was written according to Wikipedia's standards.

Speedy deletion under the A7 clause in designed for people and entities which have no significance whatsoever. It is not meant for article which may be controversial but have any possible degree of significance. While people may argue about the notability of such an article, it clearly does not meet the A7 deletionstandard listed below.

"An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization (for example, a band, club, or company, not including educational institutions),[5] or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources, and is a lower standard than notability. This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works. This criterion does not apply to species of animals, only to individual animal(s). The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source or does not qualify on Wikipedia's notability guidelines.[6] The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible. If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion." Debbie W. 21:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwainwr123 (talk • contribs)

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Sridhar1000

I'm comfortable with his latest answer; no objections to unblocking when you're comfortable with his copyright answer. Kuru (talk) 04:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)‎‎[reply]

Seamus (dog) Deletion review

Deletion review for Seamus (dog)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Seamus (dog). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Although I understand your line of thought that Seamus, Mitt Romney's dog is not significant except in context of a single incident in 1983, I don't think that other Wikipedia articles have followed that rule. There is an article for Mary Jo Kopechne, a secretary killed in a car accident of US Senator Edward Kennedy, even though she has no historic significance outside of that accident. Debbie W. 03:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC) Debbie W. 03:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Do something positive or do nothing

This [3] isn't helpful. If you are unwilling/unable to exempt the editor from the rangeblock just say nothing and let someone else help them. Nobody Ent 23:40, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:40, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your e-mail

Thanks for your e-mail. I closed the AFD for Robert Redfern because the page had already been speedy deleted by someone else and further discussion wouldn't have done anything. As for your other question, I've considered it but I probably edit in too many controversial areas for the community to want that. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rm1271

Hi there. Did you mean to block Rm1271 (talk · contribs)? Elockid (Talk) 21:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't really following. I think we may have both been trying to handle 86.182.128.140 (talk · contribs) at the same time. When I was checking the pages that 86.182.128.140 was editing, my blocking indicator script indicated that Rm1271 was blocked, so was just wondering. Elockid (Talk) 21:16, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Restore my article Family tree of Jahania

That article was a family tree of a saint of the subcontinent and the whole family is considered as Syeds(noble family members of Prophet Muhammad). I was going to link this tree to the article Family tree of Muhammad. I request you to undelete my article and flag it for improvement. I am new to wikipedia therefore i need some encouragement from your side. I challenge to every researcher to debate with me on this particular family tree. I will provide suitable references.(Shahenshahkillz (talk) 12:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Cyberpower678's talk page.
Message added 00:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 514,698,267) 00:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MSU Interview

Dear Anthony,


My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.


So a few things about the interviews:

  • Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
  • Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
  • All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
  • All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
  • The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.


Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 15:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mouna Ragam

Thanks for moving the page. But you haven't moved the talk page yet. —Vensatry (Ping me) 10:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Bass

Can you please restore the page you deleted on Caroline Bass ? Caroline is a well known real estate agent in NYC who has appeared on TV. She has been interviewed by Bloomberg News, AE Open Forum, The Daily News and this year made Forbes 30 Under 30. One of her famous clients is Tim Gunn, who dressed her on Tim Gunns Guide To Style then subsequently bought his new home from her. I regret starting the page and leaving it unattended for so long. Will have more references available online for article building in coming weeks and would love input on how to improve what I had there.

Edit: Looking again, it seems some of my edits were removed before you removed the whole thing because a source I cited became a broken link.

Thanks Besprayed (talk) 08:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Altetendekrabbe's and your threats to my editing.

Hi. You've seen my post and reacted sharply to my wording. But you failed to see his edit summary of 14:20, 10 March 2012‎ on the Article "Ahmadiyya". It says and I quote "provide a neutral and reliable source or get banned". Let also quote his response to my edit:

The Andhra Pradesh Wakf Board took a series of unprecedented decisions on February 18,2012. Probably first time in its history, the State Wakf Board has asked the Qazis in the state not to perform Nikah (marriage)of those belonging to Ahmadiyya community because they are “not Muslims.” While the Indian state has always hesitated in declaring its stand as far as the distinction between Muslims and Ahmadiyyas is concerned, the decision marks the first ever such official approval of the popular boycott of Ahmadiyyas by the Muslim community in India.<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.siasat.com/english/news/don%E2%80%99t-perform-nikaah-qadiyanis-ap-wakf-board-qazis | title=Don’t perform nikaah of Qadiyanis: AP Wakf board to Qazis |publisher=Siasat Urdu Daily, Hyderabad | author=Courtesy: Two Circles | date=February 20, 2012 | accessdate=March 10,2012}}</ref>

Is this edit not referenced? Where is the flaw? I guess your role as an admin is not to just ban/ block users but more importantly to explain the fallacy and improve the quality of Wikipedia. If so, please explain your point of view. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 11:47, 11 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Clarification : I take back my words which may suggest that you have some support for Altetendekrabbe. I've seen how this user has reported against me and I fully understand your admin role in controlling the way things have messed up. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 13:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
You've merely commented on my reference of the beliefs of this user. What about this user's persistent reverts to my edits and threatening a block on me despite he being a non-admin? What is the flaw in the source I've cited? Is it not neutral? Please explain and intervene on the matter. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 08:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
My dear Anthony Bradbury, you have merely restated your stand. But the fundamental issue is that can a non-admin simply threaten (or warn) other user about being banned or blocked when his edits have been properly referenced? If so, you are inviting a very chaotic situation where any user can hurl abuses or warn/ threaten other user unnecessarily and get away with it. Regards, Hindustanilanguage (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

You've got a message

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship#Suggestion_for_new_crats.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Helpful One 23:52, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there

HelloTheanonymous3 (talk) 02:46, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Self Explanatory quote for the language used for me on WP:RSN

hindustani is disengenious. i warned hindustani about a block primarily due to this edit summary [4]. it's a clear example of a nonsensical personal attack. "inhuman and illiberal", my foot. hindustani owes me an apology.-- altetendekrabbe  16:56, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So I see that this discussion board has provided a chance for you to use the expression my foot against me. fine. Thank you for the comment. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 09:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]
"My foot" is a phrase meaning "no way" or "not possible". It is not a personal attack. This file is not a reliable source for anything but the website itself, and obviously the article is not about the website. Dougweller (talk) 10:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fine. Referring somebody by region and calling me disingenuous is also no personal attack. Thank you, Dougweller. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 10:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Block of ip editor

Howdy. It appears that you recently blocked this IP editor for disruptive editing. Which edits in particular were disruptive? There were some apparently good edits the ip has made as well. The ones here seemed constructive.--Rockfang (talk) 21:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore the above question. :) It just occurred to me to check the talk page of the ip address.--Rockfang (talk) 21:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not "following you around", and I never stated your block was bad, or your "findings were in error". The only reason I noticed the editor was blocked was because someone with that ip made an edit to an article I have watchlisted. All I did was ask which edits were disruptive, and then it occurred to me to check that talk page.--Rockfang (talk) 23:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to apologize if I implied that you made a mistake. It was not my intention.--Rockfang (talk) 23:11, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Save the article Family tree of Jahania from deletion

Sir, This article is listed for AFD. I have been improving it for past two months. I have provided references which are quite notable. I am new to wikipedia therefore i donot know how to save this article from further loss. I have urged many other editors also in order to guide me on this article. You can see the article by your self and help me in improving, because i have provided all the references which i could find. Thanks for your encouragement in the Past.--Shahenshahkillz (talk) 09:02, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary

Thanks

Support appreciated, thanks. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:28, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Human voltage

Why did you prod it if it's already at AFD? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:00, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My block

Hello,i´m the This user i´m trying to request that remove the protection to my talk page,i want back to edit on the english Wikipedia, for request my unblock,that i need much, want have a new chance,again.Someone said me:”you never back”,but i have faith that somebody unblock me,please help to the unblock me,remember are 3 months i wish with my all heart,come back,kisses 201.220.233.205 (talk) 20:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Admin review comment

Hi! Thanks again for what you said here. You'll be pleased to know that I've closed the review, and as you predicted there was zero negative input. :) Best. Acalamari 09:49, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of The Empire Of Novaar

Hello there, I would like to contest the deletion of the page "Empire Of Novaar". It was deleted under the grounds that there was "No explanation of the article's significance". The Empire Of Novaar is a micronation, a self-proclaimed state. Many other micronations have articles on Wikipedia, be they famous (Republic Of Molossia, Principality Of Sealand) or not as famous (Neue Slowenische Kunst, for example, make claims similar to that of a micronation). The Empire Of Novaar is not a famous micronation, but it is still a micronation. Why did it deserve to be deleted? It has citizens, a government, and land.

The page was also a work in progress, even though in hindsight it should have been prepared before. I am a new user so please forgive me for this. References for the Empire Of Novaar can be found at www.circlepad.com/EmpireOfNovaar.

Please tell me how I can improve on my previous article, and I shall do so. Thank you.

EmpireOfNovaar (talk) 20:43, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

A Barnstar Point
Thanks for deleting my db-userreqs. benzband (talk) 18:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Factseducado

You deleted this page U1, however user talk pages are not eligible for U1, can you please restore. Mtking (edits) 00:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Factseducado

You deleted this users talk page in what I'm guessing was a RVT, but they haven't and are busy accusing me of outing them, participating in AFDs and an RFC/Us [5] that they were participating in previously. If you are uninvolved, it needs a look. I think they have emailed User:DGG with a complaint regarding outing, which is absurd and untrue but I'm not concerned, just informing you. I had no idea where they lived until they just now posted as an IP and signed the IP and their name, which was brilliant. They have also posted a great deal on my talk page previously. I'm involved in the other case, and they are new and unfamiliar with policy, but they seem to be unusual. I'll just leave it at that. You might want to take a look, as at the very least, the aren't complying with RTV, and they made need some edits redacted as an ip. I won't post here, they are at the link. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 00:58, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I endorse this position. The user in question has been told what their two options are (Either RTV or rescind it) multiple times. They claim to be waiting on a email and continue posting in contravention of WP:RTV. I offer a 3rd solution of Immediate Indef block to enforce the RTV. Hasteur (talk) 02:10, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored the talkpage - these should not be deleted db-user when they contain edits by other users. I have indeff'd him following his post on my talkpage, but checkuser confirms that although he appears to have created one other account, he never edited from it, and has only edited from one IP. Unless someone can identify him as a sock of another user, the rant on my page appears to be just more fiction. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 12:36, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Could you delete User:Thine Antique Pen/accverify for me? I have my own reasons. --Thine Antique Pen (talk • contributions) 19:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Could you continue your discussion somewhere other than the talk page of an inactive user? Nobody Ent 23:12, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

restore Brock Baker please

Hi Anthony (or Tony) can you please restore my page about Brock Baker? He is a real person and I did explain the importance of him. From, Heymister14

restre brock baker

His importance is not just on youtube. he does other things outside of youtube. Please stop being so mean to me. I have a rough life. from heymister14

Brock Baker

Dude. Seriously. Do you know how long it took me to make that page? An hour. Please bring it back with all the information it previously had before you deleted it. Heymister14 (talk) 21:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)heymister14[reply]

The page of: JONATHAN 'Gordinho" REXROAT

Anthony, can you restore the page I was creating of the subject headline above? Apparently you removed it because you claimed it to be copyright infringement from a FB page and other. It is no way copyrighted because I am the author of the FB page I took it from. Please restore, JONATHAN 'Gordinho' REXROAT. My son is an athlete I am trying to create a page of him. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucky Bum Management (talk • contribs) 22:12, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page of: JONATHAN 'Gordinho" REXROAT

Anthony, can you restore the page I was creating of the subject headline above? Apparently you removed it because you claimed it to be copyright infringement from a FB page and other. It is no way copyrighted because I am the author of the FB page I took it from. Please restore, JONATHAN 'Gordinho' REXROAT. My son is an athlete I am trying to create a page of him. Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucky Bum Management (talk • contribs) 22:17, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cyproterone and cyproterone acetate

Heya! Thanks for doing the move for me. Unfortunately, I think you might have messed up though. Check the pages cyproterone and cyproterone acetate. Cyproterone redirects to cyproterone acetate and cyproterone acetate redirects to itself in a redirect loop. The history for the original cyproterone article is not on either article now and is completely gone. I hope it can be recovered. Would you mind looking into all of this? el3ctr0nika (Talk | Contribs) 19:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else took care of it. Thanks though! el3ctr0nika (Talk | Contribs) 01:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PRProgRock

Thanks for your message on my talk page about user PRProgRock's unblock request. Since we both agree that it's reasonable to consider giving the user another chance, and the user has given assurances about future editing, I have gone ahead and unblocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: brock baker

I still haven't forgotten about the deletion of my page Brock Baker. The page shouldn't be deleted because of Youtube significance. Many people who became famous on Youtube have their own page, like RayWilliamJohnson, Smosh, Nigahiga, Freddiew, NicePeter, and more. Please restore his page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heymister14 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Eden

Thanks for your message on my talk page. However, I'm a little puzzled by it, as explained there. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:51, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Some people never learn

[6] JamesBWatson (talk) 19:36, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry :(

I wanted to say that I was sorry about making such a big deal about Brock Baker. My user page was deleted, as you can probably tell, and I feel bad. Heymister14 (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2012 (UTC) heymister14[reply]

question

what is wikipedia's longest page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ace10000 (talk • contribs) 09:17, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Restless Creatives Speedy Deletion Questions

Hi there Tony, I'm a new user and have just noticed my article was put up for speedy deletion. The reason given that is infringes the copyright of a BBC biogrpaphy of my composer. As my composer's agent, I supplied the biographical information to the BBC and therefore do not have to request their permission to use it. Is there anyway to get around this conundrum? We have supplied the same text to many sites and thought it would be fine to post this on Wikipedia. It's a bit of a chicken and egg scenario but we would like to get the article back up as soon as possible. Any advice is greatly appreciated! Restlesscreatives (talk) 14:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at ANI on banning LPC

LouisPhilippeCharles (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)

In the past you have been involved in a block/unblock procedure either on the sockmaster account of LouisPhilippeCharles or an account of one of the sockpuppets. Please see WP:ANI#LouisPhilippeCharles -- PBS (talk) 20:35, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI noticeboard regarding user:XB70Valyrie

Hi Anthony, I just wanted to let you know that I accidentally deleted a comment by you on the board due to an edit conflict. Even though I've been here a while I don't think I've had many edit conflicts so I will read up on the proper guidelines. I put it back in for now. Sorry about that. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 22:08, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Typo

Thamks, it was a typo for José Reynaldo Bencosme de Leon (due to my iPad).--Enzino (talk) 21:24, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Edgar Snyder

Hi. I just noticed that Edgar Snyder had been speedy-deleted. The article was on my watchlist, so I must have edited it at least once, but I wasn't a substantial contributor. However, Snyder is a figure pervasively well-known in western Pennsylvania, western Virginia, northern West Virginia, and eastern Ohio, and he has been for decades-- it's hard to overstate his stature. I say this as someone with no connection to the man or his firm. His name-recognition and visibility far surpasses that of (for example) most local and state-level politicians in the region. He is also commonly invited as a keynote speaker by various regional organizations. In closing, I'll leave you with a quick anecdote: my father, a lawyer, was chagrined to find that I had no idea how to call his office when I was a child, but I could rattle off Edgar Snyder's number without trouble. If you could userfy the article for me, I'll see what I can do with it. Thanks! —Bill Price (nyb) 15:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete Fluid Ribbon Chair

Hi Tony, I noticed you deleted the talk page where I described the content of the Fluid Ribbon Chair. I noticed that you did not reply or comment, and I wonder why. The content I posted on Fluid Ribbon Chair was factual and encyclopedic, not unambiguous advertising. The Fluid Ribbon Chair is a recognizable by design and like other chairs such as the Zig-Zag Chair (which currently has an active site) has similar factual information to what I posted. Can you please reconsider. Many thanks, Michael — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fluid Ribbon Chair (talk • contribs) 02:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Time articles

Please un-delete (at least) the following time-related articles that you deleted for the G5 reason. Other users, including myself, have done work on the time-related articles, and a lot of them were broken by some of these G5 deletions:

How can I keep this from continuing to happen? It's at least the third group of deletions (by different admins). Every time it happens, I get more discouraged that administrative policy is getting in the way of true knowledge sharing. As a result, I don't feel like editing this particular topic for a while. I get interested again, only to find another group of deletions. I'm well aware of the issues regarding the user who created these, but the "policing" is doing more harm than good. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 00:03, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Any editor is allowed to ask for a deleted article to be undeleted, so long as the articles weren't deleted for having copyvios in them or are attack articles. If Alan is asking for them to be undeleted, that means he is taking responsibility for them, regardless of the original creator. Thus, they should be undeleted and put into his userspace. SilverserenC 01:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shin Dong Woo

Shin Dong Woo is a real person which is an actor of KBS2 in Korea. Please do not delete the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Surf100ify (talk • contribs) 23:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Adam Hartung Page (A7, G12)

Dear Anthony,

You deleted the page of "Adam Hartung" even though he is being reference in the "Steve Ballmer" article. Either the non functional link should be removed from the article or the page should be restored. I think he deserves an article.

Andy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy 9 9 9 9 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Ireland

Thanks, but the page content and history seems to have gone AWOL somewhere along the line. 2 lines of K303 22:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC) Fixed. 2 lines of K303 22:48, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pocket Planes

You deleted the page while I was sleeping, so would you mind userfying the page for me? Thanks. --J (t) 14:46, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anthony Bradbury. You have new messages at Jeffwang's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

question regarding recent page deletion

Dear Anthony, perhaps I don't quite understand why the article I recently created was deleted. As being a close follower and contributor of Daniel Johnston and his art history, I believe this photographer Jung Kim (which was the page created) is a significant part of that. There were a few credible references I thought? Or maybe this is something that should just be added to Daniel Johnston's page instead? Please let me know what was missing if it's a reference issue and if you think the page can be saved with more pertinent info and what that should be. Thanks very much. Journalist68 (talk) 19:39, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Query a move

Hi sorry to bother you, I'm just asking a question about this move 13 August 2011 - the rationale was done on a successful RM to remove accents 18 July 2011 on a Chicago math professor and some communist politicians, but immediately following an unsuccessful RM on Vietnamese towns 07 Aug 2011 Talk:Cần Thơ/Archive 1. Isn't the Vietnamese dynasty more consistent with the towns rather than the Chicago math professor? It is also out of line with category:Vietnamese dynasties, or at least was - Nguyen dynasty An Duong Vuong was unilaterally moved without discussion on 20 & 23 July 2011. The majority however are still with full dynasty names. Personally I'm not sure about whether Vietnamese names should be simplified on en.wp titles or not, but the request to an admin (I'm assuming) for a private move on 13 August in conflict with the RM result immediately before on 7 August seems problematic, particularly if this private move ever gets cited as a reason for moving the other dynasties. Thanks, I will check here for reply in a day or two. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:26, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Micropharma

The user that created the above page, CSD A7/G11 deleted by you, has protested the deletion. They have had severe problems with where they have protested, though. I've cleaned up some of their mess of redirects from moves, but I'm not sure where to properly place the protest, short of cut&pasting it onto either your talk page or theirs. I think I'll leave that up to you, as well as how best to respond to them. Despite their problems, IMHO they do deserve a response, even if it is mostly to point them to WP:CORP. Anyway, at the time of my writing the note, the protest is sitting at User talk:Micropharma. Whether or not it will be left there, who knows. :) - TexasAndroid (talk) 18:28, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchy

As a third-party user, would you be willing to protect this article? A user has been editing through several IPs, despite having their account blocked, to remove the lead from the article. Thanks, SwisterTwister talk 20:43, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Inquiry

Thank you for the email you sent. At this time there are no actions to be taken as I've reduced my WP workload recently due to the "unpleasantness" (see also the archives and Talk:2012 in UFC events and it's archives) that I've been a part of. In the future there may be action to take in that direction, but at this time with the taste in the mouth of several editors that anybody involved in the MMA project space (even if they are no longer involved) is a gaurnteed recipie for drama of the first order (See the recent AN or ANI where someone made the comment "MMA deletions, not that crap again"). I do intend at some point for that action to take place, but not for 6 months. Thank you for your consideration. Hasteur (talk) 22:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion: Where is the work that I just started on Ricardo Regazzoni?

I was in the middle of an edit, and you deleted the page, and now I just lost twenty minutes of work, plus the little stub that you deleted.

I don't understand why it was important to speedily delete a page on an artist whose significance is well documented in the art world. All you had to do was complete a google search to see that he has cultural signifcance. This is the kind of stuff that reduces the number of editors on Wikipedia.

You don't even appear to have any expertise with art, why are you getting involved with it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Texjer (talk • contribs) 21:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dieyu

I blocked as a username violation based on these edits:[8], [9] and [10] where he linked to dieyu.org. Daniel Case (talk) 14:31, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My articles

why have yoou freakin deleated my articles and labeled the Hoax's21:28, 1 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grahamfs2009 (talk • contribs)

Answered on your talk page.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:39, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For your information its a different Youth World Cup for Semi-Pro footballers such as Carla Bird and its sponsored by Mcdonalds,Nissan and Sony and ran by FIFA.21:40, 1 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grahamfs2009 (talk • contribs)

Put my article backGrahamfs2009 (talk) 13:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

relation

why are you asking this question?GeorgeT2008 (talk) 18:23, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know him..... he's a great man and a brilliant manager but no we're not related.GeorgeT2008 (talk) 18:51, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TBrandley 21:43, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again! Sorry, should have wrote differently; see the bottom section for the IP address 68.37.29.229. Because you were involved in this as seen at the IPs talk page; thought I should let you know. Thank you. TBrandley 21:47, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you very much for your participation in my recent RfA. I appreciate that you took the time to read through my nomination statement and gave me serious consideration for the role.

As a side note, I'm not 100% sure what you meant by "normal admin role", but chances are I wouldn't have been the most active admin on the site, if that's the impression you had taken from my nomination statement. Now, if it came across as though I was looking for adminship as a trophy or a badge of honour, I should emphasize the fact that I have never viewed it as such. In my mind, +sysop is nothing more than an advanced set of tools entrusted to experienced, capable editors for the purpose of providing maintenance assistance. Nevertheless, I can understand why people may have developed that notion after reading through my RfA.

In any case, I'm very grateful to have had the opportunity to interact with such a broad array of the community. Take care. =) Master&Expert (Talk) 08:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd post a "talkback" template if I didn't hate that term so much. =/
So I guess this should suffice. Ahem...
"You have new messages at Kurtis's talk page."
Regards. Master&Expert (Talk) 09:43, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Caiden Cowger

Could you please undo your speedy deletion of Caiden Cowger? The version you deleted was not the original version of the page, but a rewrite by single-purpose account User: Caidencowgerprogram. Prior to Caidencowgerprogram's hijacking of the article, though, it was a valid article with reliable sources, so neither A7 nor A11 applied. I believe speedy deletion criteria only apply if there are no previous good versions of the page, which is not the case here; the proper thing to do would have been to rollback all of Caidencowgerprogram's edits rather than delete the article altogether. If you have doubts about his notability, you could nominate the article for AFD, however Cowger has received quite a bit of coverage in the news media (not unlike Jonathan Krohn before him), so there's a good case to be made that he is notable enough for an article. LonelyBoy2012 (talk) 03:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If it is reinstated, I will nominate it for AfD, FYI. OhNoitsJamie Talk 03:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DefySupply page

Hi Anthony,

In March 2009, a page entitled DefySupply was deleted due to blatant advertising. This was the information provided: 21:02, 3 March 2009 Anthony Bradbury (talk | contribs) deleted page Defysupply (G11: Blatant advertising).

I just joined the DefySupply team and I'm looking to recreate this page, without any advertising. I believe there is a lot of merit to what we have to offer to the larger community through our experiences with global supply chain management and share how these experiences impact the furniture industry. Please let us know how we can avoid deletion this time around.

Thanks, Elissa, DefySupply.com

DefySupply Furniture (talk) 18:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Bassmaster

Did you had a look at the talk page before deleting the page? --Anbu121 (talk me) 20:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Viktoria Bolonina

Why did you delete the above article? It was only tagged for lack of references. It was never tagged for notablity issues. Sardaka (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my page?

Sir,

I do not agree with your latest deletion of my page actions. Kindly explain. Many thanks. Pascal Najadi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.92.150.58 (talk) 00:58, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That is saddening me a lot - Sorry if you got that wrong let me explain Sir

You and I actually have one thing in common. I am also an officer of the Swiss Airforce. We also have the F/A 18 mind you, the ripper. Like you I value patriotism and I love America and may the greatest spirit of all "We the People" live on.

I apologize but I am frustrated. Can you please for one minute imagine the anger you would have if let us say United Airlines got wiped out by politics and some feisty unethical Wallstreet dudes? Killing tens of thousands of jobs?

Well, as you can see I helped to bring the truth on the Swiss and German manipulation to bring down Swissair to the public. I also defended US Creditors and at the same time after the catastrophic grounding lined up a pro bono action with Merrill Lynch, my old colleagues, to rescue to airline. Lufthansa won the battle with the UBS bankers, fending off our initiative.

But, we did all this for the greater cause.

Please reconsider and again, I am sorry.

Warm regards Pascal

Semper-Fi (I have some very good friends in the US Marine Corps, respect to them!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.92.150.58 (talk) 16:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

old moves

Hi, in editing Hồ dynasty I have just noticed your move:

  • 19:32, 13 August 2011 moved Hồng Bàng Dynasty to Hong Bang dynasty noted "Drop Vietnamese diacritics as there is virtually no use in published English. See Britannica, discussion at Talk:Ngo Bao Chau)

Except that there is no discussion of Hồng Bàng Dynasty or any ancient subject at mathematician Talk:Ngo Bao Chau and this move comes not after Talk:Ngo Bao Chau, but instead 13 August 2011 immediately following 07 August 2011 no consensus for a move at Talk:Cần Thơ/Archive 1 which the initiator of both the failed RM and the "uncontroversial request" failed to declare to you as admin actioning the "uncontroversial move". Then I see an editor has recently tried to undo your move, with it being, apparently second dbmove "uncontroversial request" back to the undiscussed move result, further indication that it was not in any way an uncontroversial move. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:55, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There also seems something odd about the deleted moves of original redirect Hong Bang dynasty that had 2 or 3 db-move requests to allow Hồng Bàng Dynasty to be moved there twice. I spoke to the editor who tried to revert this (your) move and he's intending to put in a RM to restore your move, and requested I helped him proofread it, but I find the history of the page confusing. Is there one or more deleted edit between these two edits which isn't visible? For example a second placing of a dbmove template on Hong Bang dynasty to clear the way for a second uncontroversial move. Not really that important, since a RM is likely anyway, but if helping draft the RM would like to understand the page history correctly. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:06, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anthony, many thanks. If that's the limit of available information I'll get on with assisting the User who reverted it to take to a RM. There's also a question in at WT:CAPS regarding capitalization of Dynasty which needs to be resolved. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:25, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
? Well evidently it isn't. Sorry Anthony, I don't see the relevance of the above link. FWIW I didn't participate in that ANI discussion, and that ANI discussion doesn't mention (evidently User Karl B wasn't aware) either the 600x dbmoves in addition to 1000 moves under own name, nor discovery 2 days later of IP puppetry hiding RM results prior to requesting "uncontroversial moves" so I cannot see what possible relevance it has to Hồng Bàng Dynasty. Other than that it appears 2x dbmove templates were placed on the same redirect Hong Bang dynasty to "uncontroversial move" it twice. In any case that will no doubt all come out in the wash in an RM. At the moment the capitalization question is more immediate... Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 07:01, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Raleigh Moncrief

Hi, I saw you A7'ed this article. Was the speedy placed by the IP 94.12.133.144? If so, I believe it to be a bad-faith nomination; there is an ongoing discussion about this at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Cvlwr. In any case, I believe this article, when it existed, was not bereft of third-party references and made claims that approached WP:MUSIC, at least in a way that would render it unspeediable. Could you please take a second look? Thanks Chubbles (talk) 01:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That IP was going around tagging Cvlwr's articles for deletion as created by a blocked sock. While this is true, the article was created in a reasonably well-curated manner, and Moncrief should pass the threshold of notability as having released an album on the label Anticon which has been reviewed by many major music magazines (e.g., [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]). I'd be happy to add these to a restored article. Chubbles (talk) 23:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FYI - at WP:REFUND#Raleigh Moncrief an IP user requested undeletion. I told him if he had sources to show them to you, but he has posted them there (from another 124 IP - I don't know if these are part of the Cvlwr situation). JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I certainly don't know what you mean by "criteria at WP:MUSIC do not apply"; Moncrief is a musician and the notability of the subject is governed by WP:MUSIC, as is whether or not he is A7able. And the sources provided, as well as those noted at the REFUND request, clearly demonstrate that he is the subject of multiple nontrivial articles from third-party publications, which meets WP:MUSIC bullet 1, and, in my opinion, WP:GNG to boot. I think that A7 is for clear cases, and this is nowhere near a clear A7; it at the very least deserves the attention of the community at large before deletion. Chubbles (talk) 22:02, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you wish to take it to deletion review I shall not contest whatever view the community arrive at. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:07, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like somebody beat me to it. Chubbles (talk) 01:12, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phúc Yên

Hey sorry to bother you again, just cleaning up undiscussed moves done counter the 3 of 3 Vietnam place names RMs at Talk:Cà Mau . Found a town name Phúc Yên where you were G6-requested-ed 1 Nov 2011 contrary geo names RM Talk:Cà Mau 7 Aug 2011. As different G6 "uncontroversial moves" admins have different attitudes to this, I thought I would leave it up to you whether to restore Phúc Yên or have a 4th place name RM to enforce result of previous 3. Take care and thanks for reply on page about earlier. The other editor hasn't yet done the dynasty restore RM. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

done thank you, you are an absolute gentleman. So sorry that you should even be touched by this, best regards. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please restore two recent speedy deletions

You recently deleted two "templates" covering roads in Toronto. There was an ongoing discussion over these on my talk page, which the person who tagged them with CSD chose to ignore further discussion in favour of CSDing them. These are clearly contentious and should go through another XfD rather than being speedied to sweep them under the mat (as I indicated in the contested deletion). I'd like request that you please undelete them so that a proper discussion can actually take place, since deletion review is for reviewing the conclusion of a deletion discussion and not determining whether there is consensus to undelete. - Floydian τ ¢ 23:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These two templates were speedied as recreating templates deleted via a proper TfD process. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:01, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And I am requesting they be restored through the proper process so that a deletion discussion can be held, as is the proper process when something is contentious like this and clearly the situation has changed from the original XfD. However, you are trying as hard as you can to subvert that discussion. It is pointy, harassing, and manipulative. - Floydian τ ¢ 00:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You recreating the templates by a cut & paste move from your user space, where they were restored solely so that the content could be migrated to another form of TOC template (which you did not use), and then deploying them without discussion, is not the proper process. Another editor explained this to you on your talk page a few hours ago. The situation has not "changed from the original XfD". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 01:44, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"they were restored solely so that the content could be migrated to another form of TOC template" - where have you gotten this idea from? "deploying them without discussion" - discussion isn't necessary on every change on wikipedia. I was bold, and I've given my reasoning. My change remained for over 5 months before another user brought it up on my talk page. Within two hours, you had taken it upon yourself to be the gatekeeper. "Another editor explained this to you on your talk page a few hours ago" - Yes, and I responded and we discussed it... unlike you, who have chosen to initiate a content dispute and excessive time wasting rather than discussing or allowing me to start a second XfD. "The situation has not "changed from the original XfD"" - Ok, that's wonderful that you feel that way, but I don't. But, seeing as you are confident on your stance, you should have no objection to a new XfD. - Floydian τ ¢ 03:06, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The only recent relevant deletions that I can see that I have done were a couple of talk-page deletions under category G8 relating to article deletions undertaken by Skier Dude. I do not deny your claim, but cannot identify the articles in question. Would you care to quote the exact titles?--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See User talk:Floydian#Talk:List of east–west roads in Toronto/TOC. These templates were deleted following this discussion, Floydian got them userfied, and then for some reason copy-pasted them into new pages (in talkspace: they aren't talk pages) in order to undo the TfD result. I don't know why he's requesting they be undeleted when he's still got the originals sitting in his userspace. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that I have no further comment to make.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:00, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm sure Andy will if I do such a thing, seeing as he's willing to edit war and use rollback on non-vandalism edits... But it's worth a shot. - Floydian τ ¢ 14:08, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I note that Floydian has ignored your decision and recreated both templates. Would you like to borrow a trout? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You mean so that I could start the discussion you are so desperately grasping at all straws to circumvent? How aweful of me... too bad, so sad. - Floydian τ ¢ 13:12, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[With apologies to Anthony for abusing his talk page; I suggest future discussion bellongs elsewhere.] If you read what I wrote recently on your talk page, you will notice that I recommended a discussion. We do not need these malformed, misplaced and out-of-process recreations of what is already in your user space in order to discuss it. As for your attempt to put words in my mouth... Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:33, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bradbury]]"talk" 15:31, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]