User talk:Ansett/Archive 2

Archives

Ansett, it looks like you mistakenly created your 1st archive at Link created on the 1st move, which is a mainspace article. I've moved your new archive to User:Ansett/Archive 1. Please make sure further archives are in this format. (in your userspace) Cheers, Tangotango 13:41, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I am a little confused about all that - but I'll see how I go. Ansett 13:45, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When you move the talk page in the future, make sure the name of the new page is User:Ansett/Archive 2 (or 3 etc) that way it will be in the user space as a subpage of your main page. That help? Oh and sorry if I am coming accross as a bit cranky - I have an exam tomorrow so are stressed. Viridae 13:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking

Please refrain from blanking pages - if you want to remove your comments from an AfD please use the strikethrough tags <s> </s>. Comments on AfDs are kept so as not do make other users comments ambiguous. You have been warned a number of time about page blanking, please stop. Thanks for your help. ViridaeTalk 13:16, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thats only happend one other time, the first time it was by accident! Ansett 13:44, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Noted. ViridaeTalk 14:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sovereign Hill.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Sovereign Hill.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Circeus 16:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Fair use criteria, a policy, clearly states:
Always use a more free alternative if one is available.
We have a free image available, and thus the image you uploaded does not qualify for fair use, and will be deleted. Circeus 05:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded Sovereign_Hill.jpg because I did not think the image there before it (Sovereign_hill_window.jpg), was appropriate and did not meet image quality standards. Ansett 05:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I actually agree with you that the window one is terrible. There is a request for image page here: Wikipedia:Requested pictures. Maybe you could get someone to take or upload one for the article? ViridaeTalk 05:28, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thank you Viridae will do Ansett 05:09, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No probs. ViridaeTalk 05:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My Images

I am wanting to upload some images that I have taken, to add value to articles. Which image license gives most protection/control (over how its used) to the original creator, that includes "No Derivative Works" and that can be used on Wikipedia? Ansett 11:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ansett, there is no such license that is compatible with Wikipedia. Creative Commons does have a no-derivatives license, but the only CC licenses usable on Wikipedia are cc-by-sa (attribution/share alike) and cc-by (attribution). The other licenses are similarly non-restrictive, as they are meant to be on Wikipedia. Cheers, Tangotango 11:47, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ansett Australia

Why does Ansett talk page have this: "This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale."

Is a "rating on the importance scale" important and how does the article get a rating? Ansett 08:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It looks as though the WikiProject rates articles on importance of some sort. It's on other Australia articles as well. I'd guess you would find more information on the Project page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia.--JD[don't talk|email] 08:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Local Government Areas of Melbourne

Most of the Council names are incorrect on the "Local Government Areas of Melbourne" template (eg. City of Banyule correct Banyule City Council) You can see the template at the bottom of Banyule City Council. Who can fix this? Ansett 09:23, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody can edit the template, which is located at {{LGAMelbourne}} -- Longhair 09:24, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment

Can you please tell me the correct text/code for quality scale and importance scale? As I am having problems with including quality scale and importance scale in the one template.

I am sorry, but I don't understand your request. Would you please eleaborate and put {{helpme}} back up —— Eagle (ask me for help) 03:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment Ansett

Knox Shopping Centre

Is there something wrong with the Shopping Centre Template on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knox_Shopping_Centre ? Can some one please correct it? Its displaying things like {{{parking}}}???

No those things need to be added, but if you find that annoying ask about it {{Infobox shopping mall}}. Thanks. —— Eagle (ask me for help) 03:37, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ansett. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ansett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ansett. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sigma Pharmaceuticals logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sigma Pharmaceuticals logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lion Air Australia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lion Air Australia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lion Air Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:24, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Coles Group Limited Logo.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Coles Group Limited Logo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:17, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Melbourne Crest.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Melbourne Crest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]