User talk:Anonimu/Complete Works/Tom 4 (2011)


WikiProject Dacia

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 00:56, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Crobidae

Hi! Thanks for linking Crobidae with Krobyzoi. However, the later is the Greek form, to which you could covert every tribe name. We have to keep consistency and I believe we mostly used the Latin form. Also, you redirected, but no content from the Crobidae was moved over. Please try to do that next time. I see are editing a lot of Dacia related articles. Perhaps you should join WikiProject Dacia, communicate and collaborate with rest of us. Thanks and best regards.--Codrin.B (talk) 22:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Declined, content dispute

FYI - edit, Jeepday (talk) 13:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

January 2011

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Racconish Tk 07:56, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

My apologies for the above caution note, you are obviously an experienced editor.Racconish Tk 13:46, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
No problem. Given the "publicity" I've had from certain users, your message here is perfectly excusable.Anonimu (talk) 19:01, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Anonimu. You have new messages at Talk:Krobyzoi.
Message added 19:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Please comment Codrin.B (talk) 19:09, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the input. More notes, same place.--Codrin.B (talk) 20:24, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Dacia scope clarifications and disclaimer

Hello! Given the potential for conflict and suspicions raised by the WikiProject Dacia , I added an important notice for scope clarifications and disclaimer in the intro section. If interested and willing, please review and provide any feedaback and suggestions you may have. Thank a lot! --Codrin.B (talk) 19:42, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Ion Iliescu

What vandalism did I make on the Ion Iliescu page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kakamaka (talk • contribs) 20:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

My bad

What happened here is a complicated mistake of mine: having glanced over it, I thought that, well, somebody had tried to differentiate between PSDR members and politicians, not realizing that it was a lost link to the since-moved PSD politicians (back then PSD members). Otherwise, no contest on the rationale: I was the one who put the link in there to begin with. Dahn (talk) 10:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

No problem.Anonimu (talk) 20:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Despre cinare și altele

Bună, în legătură cu cinare, nu înțeleg care a fost problema. Scopul acelui text este să arate aproprierea de limbile latine, motiv pentru care trebuie plasat și la timpurile și modurile corespunzătoare. Eu doar am pus verbul la infinitivul lung (care apropo, astăzi este mult mai folosit decât infinitivul scurt în vorbire, în special sub formă de complement). Nimeni nu spune practic „M-am îmbrăcat înainte de a pleca”, dar spune „M-am îmbrăcat înainte de plecare”. La fel nimeni nu spune „m-am spălat înainte de a coborî” (?!), dar spune „m-am spălat înainte de coborâre”. Și exemplele sunt o grămadă. Infinitivul lung este un mod recunoscut de gramatica limbii române, care prin articulare se substantivizează. P.S. Plus că forma cinare e folosită en-gros în română: ex. filmul „Cinare pe stânca”, „oportunități de cinare și petrecere a timpului liber” și chiar în viața de zi cu zi (sigur problema e că noi nu prea folosim verbul „a cina”, asta e adevărat, pentru că folosim mai degrabă verbul „a mânca”). Dar asta nu înseamnă că folosim mai degrabă „înainte de a cina” în loc de „înainte de cinare”. Noroc. --Danutz (talk) 10:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Danutz, nu-mi dau seama de ce faci astfel de afirmații, dar nu sînt tocmai în regulă.
  • Infinitivul lung nu este mult mai folosit decît cel scurt (decît poate în unele traduceri de soft...). În orice caz infinitivul scurt nu a devenit nici arhaic, nici rar.
  • Exprimările înainte de a mînca și înainte de a coborî sînt cît se poate de naturale, în timp ce înainte de mîncare e puțin forțat; mai natural e înainte de masă (înainte de coborîre merge la limită). De fapt alegerea între cele două feluri de infinitiv se face după alte criterii, în primul după cum avem nevoie sau nu să exprimăm subiectul sau complementele verbului respectiv. Astfel, există situații cînd infinitivul lung nici nu poate fi folosit: înainte de a te juca merge, dar înainte de jucarea ta nu.
  • Infinitivul lung este deja substantiv înainte de a-l mai articula.
  • Cinare nu e folosit en-gros deloc. E forțat și e o raritate. Cel mult spunem cină, dar și așa îl cam ocolim.
  • Oportunități de cinare e o exprimare trasă de păr (pe Google lipsește cu desăvîrșire). În plus oportunități e mai degrabă un calc după engleză; în româna românească spunem ocazii, prilejuri, posibilități.
  • Nu, spunem mai degrabă înainte de a cina decît înainte de cinare. Ia de exemplu un verb folosit mai des, a dormi, și observă că înainte de a dormi și înainte de dormire apar pe Google cu frecvențe disproporționate, cu scorul 1 milion și ceva la 7 (șapte bucăți). Eventual repetă experimentul și cu alte verbe: a vorbi, a coborî etc. (Exemplul înainte de a cina e afectat de Wikipedia.)
Dar problema cu exemplul acela din Romanian language este că nu e clar la ce folosește --- apropierea de limba latină n-o poți demonstra cu 5-6 cuvinte alese pe sprînceană --- și mă tem că nici verificabilă nu e metoda asta de ilustrare. Mi se pare un exemplu ales cu mare grijă, să nu cumva să scape vreun cuvînt de origine slavă. Ridică probleme de neutralitate. — AdiJapan 12:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Battlbaia.png

Thank you for uploading File:Battlbaia.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B (talk) 19:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I didn't realize it was a GFDL-self tag. You may want to consider putting a clear statement of authorship on your image uploads, rather than just using the tags. --B (talk) 19:36, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

AE notice

Unfortunately, I have been forced to file an Arbitration Enforcement request against you at WP:AE.--Codrin.B (talk) 02:37, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Three reverts in a day, Anonimu? [1][2][3] That is never acceptable, but is especially disappointing to see from somebody who was unblocked on a second chance basis. I said here [4] that I consider our mentorship arrangement to have concluded on the basis that you have long since proven yourself to be capable of editing independently, but perhaps I was wrong. I would encourage you to make a statement at the arbitration enforcement thread, because the consensus forming there is that your behaviour warrants a sanction. AGK [•] 16:12, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Considering that sources were constantly removed from article during a talk page discussion (NOT with CodrinB, who, after some personal attacks thrown at everybody opposing his version, just ceased any further dialogue; the discussion is ongoing BTW), I may have not observed that those 3 reverts fell so close one after another. My editing behaviour over there was obviously procedurally wrong (albeit not necessarily infringing policy), and probably claiming IAR would not help me, but the fact remains that dealing with an editor which refuses discussion and droves interested editors away may entice some frustration, which may lead to unintentional breach of policy (which may or may not be the case here).Anonimu (talk) 16:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Warning per WP:AE#Anonimu

Please see the result here. You are warned not to edit war, and that you are still under a WP:1RR restriction. Discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBMAC apply to your edits, so that a topic ban is possible if problems continue. This warning has been logged at WP:ARBMAC and Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Anonimu. If you continue to get into editing disputes about WP:DACIA, admins may not have much sympathy, given the history of this dispute. You are encouraged to ask experienced editors for advice if you get into disagreements. EdJohnston (talk) 04:47, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Sic dixit Hetthaeus

Te-ai suparat pe mine? Pai de ce? Mongolita. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.163.25.158 (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Vo-piervyh, te înfăţişezi aici într-o zi cu însemnătate deosebită, însemnătate pe care nesocoteşti cu desăvîrşire. Vo-vtaryh, cu prilejul ultimei tale prezenţe legitime pe aici, ai sprijinit păreri cu desăvîrşire retrograde. V-triityih, aici norodul grăieşte englezeşte, şi as dovedi că nu cinstesc obştea dacă stărui în a glăsui într-un grai pe care dînşii nu'l stăpînesc.Anonimu (talk) 20:30, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
Yes, please converse in English. Toddst1 (talk) 21:17, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

But this doesn't concern them; and you don't need an audience as your witness. So you made a few friends here... this gives you confidence? You and The-Other-One manipulated Lenin's will and I had to share Trotsky's fate. Conscious is like gravity: it will eventually drag you down. Mongolita. --93.163.25.158 (talk) 23:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Dobrogea

See reply on my talk page. — AdiJapan 07:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Museums and the miners

Regarding [5], see [6]. It's only one museum and it was only (illegaly and absurdly) searched, not devastated, so I'm not suggesting to put back the phrase (because it's not very relevant in the article about Ion Iliescu), but it's an interesting fact... Razvan Socol (talk) 17:44, 1 June 2011 (UTC)