Hello, Angloguy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking  or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot ( talk) 17:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Getting started
|
|
|
Getting help
|
|
|
Policies and guidelines
|
|
|
The community
|
|
Writing articles
|
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Danny Glover has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2ft5JkNWJA&feature=player_embedded. (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey! Welcome! I noticed your edits to Chris Dodd's page, and you have exactly the precision and objectivity that make a great wikipedian. Keep up the great work!
Personally, I think the Linda McMahon page needs someone who could offer a fresh look. Please feel free to contribute--I would greatly appreciate it!
Thanks so much!
Sincerely,--Screwball23 talk 19:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Angloguy. We've been having a bit of a back and forth on the Danny Glover article regarding his comments about the Haitian earthquake. My primary concern is that his quote not be taken out of context. I've left in the quote that you placed there (which is accurate) and added some of his previous statements that help to put his statements into perspective. I hope this looks good to you. Let me know what you think. Gobonobo T C 12:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Oberlin College, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. This applies in particular to insinuating that the shoplifting event was related to the 2016 presidential election, and to speculations about the impact of the letter on the jury. HaeB (talk) 06:58, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
This protest was a BLM operation. BLM became very active immediately after Trump was elected. This incident would not have occurred otherwise. The mass email is germaine to the events. This is a breaking story and it is important that these two facts be reported here. The only websites I can find to list these two facts carry a lot of other information which I consider to be less than reliable. I don't like to point to sources which are only intermittently reliable. The accuracy of what is posted here should not suffer because of the scorched earth practiced by both sides of this debate.Angloguy (talk) 07:30, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
