This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page
This is skooge talking about the SOC article i don't really get it what should i put on the article to keep it alive! Please let me do modifacations before you delete it please!
I can't delete the article on admins can do that. However currently, like I said on the article's talkpage, the article is lacking sources that back up it's notability. The article itself has no indication of how the subject is notable therefore it will be deleted unless you can make modification to the article indicating the subject's importance and significance i.e why should it have it's own article in an enclyopedia. AngelOfSadness talk 01:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The website in itself won't help the article establish notabilty. That needs to be done by independant third party sources. And I'm failing to see where in the article that says that the subject is notable. Read WP:WEB to find out what meets the notibility critera for web content. AngelOfSadness talk 01:18, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Its famous because many people know about it and would like to see an article on it...I bet you one out of every 5 people who play Bf 2142 know about SOC —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skooge229 (talk • contribs) 02:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't even know what Bf 2142 is but the views of fans won't get it its own article. If it was mentioned in notable internet magazines well it might have a chance of it's own article. But without sources there's no article. There's no point having an article without sources. I mean not even Tribalwars has it's own website and literally hundreds of thousands of people know about that, the people who signed up to play it. AngelOfSadness talk 02:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers for the barnstar :D. For a second there, when I saw the header in the TOC, I was like "Oh God another new editor who is angry at me for the deletion of their nonsensical/non notable article". And know you can see I'm very glad that it's a barnstar and not the latter. Thanks again. :) AngelOfSadness talk 14:49, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the revert, I was actually at the ready to do it myself, but I sometimes wait to see how long it takes before someone else can do it. I've had to wait 3 hours once! (though I wasn't online at the time) Happy editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk21:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and I see that you've been involved with one of the Peewees. If you want to list an MO or evidence because we're doing a checkuser on him, go right ahead! -Goodshoped22:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey AngelOfSadness! I wanted to say thanks a ton for your support in my request for adminship, which ended with 61 supports, 3 opposes, and 1 neutral. I hope your confidence in me proves to be justified, and please feel free to call on me if you ever need any help or opinions! GlassCobra01:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Really need your help to make a userbox, I tried to read the page how to do it and I got lost as FUCK XD.
Make it Here? I know what I want in it...if you accept I'll tell you. --Diaboli10:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently, the person who "owns" the page can find every reason to keep it there, with a certain bias towrds labeling the band the most absurd genre. This is in regards to the Alesana page. I take it that it's off your watchlist? I've given up on trying to stick the right genre up there, the person who apparently "owns" the page (Ambrosia, I believe?) wont let me. I also saw that it didn't meet notability, however I was probably wrong with that one (Their "international" tour is between US and Canada. Go figure). Anyways, thanks for the help at the start, again. It's off my watchlist so I'm not going to go through that stuburn nonsense again. Was just notifying you, in case of something or another. By the way, can I ask where you got that WikiDefCon thing? Seems interesting. IronCrow23:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think I took it off my watchlist about two days ago as it seemed the genre debate wasn't going anywhere and no official links were going to change that. Although I wonder if they know that no one "owns" the page even if they claim they wrote most of it or created it or whatever. The Wiki DefCon stuff can be found here. Hope this helps :D AngelOfSadness talk 23:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. =) That was one of the more unusual ones I've seen. I'm not sure where that came from. =\ The editor doesn't look familiar. -- Gogo Dodo00:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problemo. The editor could be a blocked user seeking revenge on past encounters. But then again, they might have seen one of your edits on the RC and decided to have, what their idea of "fun" is. AngelOfSadness talk 17:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again for the revert on my Talk page. Yet another one that I don't know where it came from. Oh, well, comes with the territory, I guess. Thanks again. =) -- Gogo Dodo07:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou for supporting my successful rfa which closed with 58 supports. If i am honest i am rather humbled by the unanimous support and i hope to live up to everyones expectations. If you ever need any help, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks again. Woodym55513:38, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My creation of the post "Mooker" is really the nickname of Mark Kieso and is the title that he goes by. This is not a personal attack on Mark Kieso and I am sorry for the misunderstanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkieso (talk • contribs) 18:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I accidentally tagged it as a personal attack and was in the middle of undoing it when the page got deleted. Anyway it still would have got deleted as it was a nickname of a person in an article that didn't assert the importance or significance of said subject. However I have seen that nickname being used in a disparaging fashion like here for example. Apparently its a disparaging slang term and creating an article with a disparaging slang term next to a living person isn't the sort of thing that isn't accepted on wikipedia per WP:BLP. But it's ok if you didn't realise this as you seem like you are new to wikipedia. Welcome by the way :D AngelOfSadness talk 19:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know but it ain't my secret page. It belongs to <removed for the hell of it :D> if you check his userpage, it confirms this. And I too am waiting for my barnstar. :) AngelOfSadness talk 00:13, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ahh I see. ~gloats~ We can really start gloating when we receive our barnstars and get to put them on our userpages for everyone to see. When he said he was going to do something to my userspace that had never been done before, I didn't know what to expect but he was right. No-one has done this before that I know of and we are the first people to find the page. ~gloats more~ :D AngelOfSadness talk 00:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
NHRHS2010 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
zOMGWTFBBQ!!!111!1111! - I just vandalized your talk page!!111! zOMGWTFBBQ!!!111!1111! - I just vandalized your talk page!!111! zOMGWTFBBQ!!!111!1111! - I just vandalized your talk page!!111! zOMGWTFBBQ!!!111!1111! - I just vandalized your talk page!!111! zOMGWTFBBQ!!!111!1111! - I just vandalized your talk page!!111!
This looks like vandalism. (I can't believe that an administrator is actually vandalizing AngelOfSadness' talk page just to get the counter to turn 100!) NHRHS2010 talk 05:30, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It totally counts as vandalism. I'm glad that it was a lot more original then what I usually get (e.g unimagnative attacks like "You suck"). It's unbelievable but I knew that once I mentioned that I was waiting for #100 that someone, like a respected editor, would go for it. But unlike what my user talkpage header says, this is going to be the only occasion where I will leave the vandalism intact. :D AngelOfSadness talk 17:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My userpage hardly gets vandalised anymore, mainly because I got it protected because a dynamic IP troll kept returning. But luckily enough I don't get the same amount of vandalism that Jimbo gets on his userpage. AngelOfSadness talk 23:24, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
First thing off, where is the assumtion coming from that I know nothing about these artists. Second thing the revert I did was accidental and then got distracted when reverting it back. And I'm sorry about that. Also please stop vandalising other articles like this and this. Those edits are considered vandalism and there's no denying that. AngelOfSadness talk 19:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
...thank you for your participation. I withdrew with 83 supports, 42 opposes, and 8 neutrals. Your kind words and constructive criticism are very much appreciated. I look forward to using the knowledge I have accrued through the process to better the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers and Wikidudeman for their co-nominations.
Thank you so much for voicing your support in my successful RfA. I'm humbled to have the community's trust. As I master the ways of the mop and bucket, please don't hesitate to message me for any advice or corrections. Cheers! Spellcast00:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thankspam
Thank you...
...for your participation, criticism, and support in my recent RfA, which succeeded with a final count of 90/1/1. I appreciate all of your kind words, criticism, and suggestions. I extend a special thanks to Acalamari for his nomination, and Dihydrogen Monoxide and Husond for their coaching and nominations. If you need help in any administrative matters, please contact me.
Thank you again and, best regards, Neranei
This RfA thanks inspired by VanTucky's which was in turn inspired by LaraLove's which was inspired by The Random Editor's, which was inspired by Phaedriel's original thanks.
Oh cheers for that. First the guy pastes "I am a jerk" all over my talkpage then pleads to not be "deleted". Oh if only we could delete vandals or can we? <begins to stroke chin and shift eyes> AngelOfSadness talk 16:57, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers for that. I'm suspecting it was the same person as it was all over the Megadeth article in the last twenty minutes and they both asked to be blocked. Also the two IP's are in the same range as each other. Anyway thanks again and I'm sure the vandals would like to thank you too for blocking them. :D AngelOfSadness talk 18:30, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. I also thanked User:Edgar181, the blocking admin, for blocking the IP that vandalized my page. That IP vandalized my page perhaps because I have warned him/her for vandalizing someone else's user/usertalk page. NHRHS2010 talk 22:04, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's exactly what happened and they continued to vandalise many other userpages before they got to yours and I filed the almighty report and reverted their edits. Anyway we shouldn't see them for at least a week as part of the block prevents account creation. Hopefully they'll find something else to do in the meantime. AngelOfSadness talk 22:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think you've made a BIG mistake. I've never edited the article "Arse bandit". I have already my own account. Reconsider what you write before you send it. Timpul15:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've replied to Timpul on their talk page, one of the nonconstructive editors you warned, copied and pasted your warning onto Timpul's talk page, for some strange reason, and thus, it appeared you warned Timpul. I explained the situation, linked to the history to show it was an anon editor who added it, and hopefully Timpul will understand you were unaware of such a thing. Cheers, my dear Angel! Ariel♥Gold22:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers for that. I was getting really confused because I'm always careful of who I'm warning, and if I make a mistake usually I realise straight away and undo my edit. AngelOfSadness talk 22:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(EC)I always do and it wasn't me who put that warning on your talkpage. If you look at this you will notice an IP pasted that warning from somewhere else using my signature. If you had looked at this IP's talkpage you would notice I gave them a warning for vandalising a different article. Also if you look at my contributions, you would have noticed I reverted the IP's edit and warned them the exact same minute that they pasted the message on your talkpage. It's the IP address that owes you an apoligy, not me. Also by the looks of it they vandalised your userpage aswell before I found them. Maybe it's a dynamic IP/sockpuppet/blocked user that you had encounters with before? AngelOfSadness talk 22:44, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think my comments would help the discussion as ,quite frankly, the possible public domain/unknown copyright arguments have me divided. I've only started trying to gain understanding of the image policies and guidelines recently. I know there are editors on wikipeida that work mainly on images, and would know the policies and guidlines like the back of their hand. Unfortunately I don't have that volume of image policy knowledge to make a comment that would help the discussion along. AngelOfSadness talk 19:03, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problemo. I saw a user called "Cremepuffhater" creating a section called Sockpuppetry on your talkpage abd put 25000 of content after it. Without having to read the message I reverted it and the user was immediately blocked (because of the username). Anyway, your welcome :D AngelOfSadness talk 01:28, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Rjd0060 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
You're welcome for the revert. :) I think that vandal was a sockpuppet of Rockies9987. See this edit as evidence, and compare it with the vandal I just reverted and blocked. Also note that both Rockies9987 and Americatown target Cremepuff222 (who was mentioned in the recent vandalism), you, and I. Acalamari21:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I haven't been around, my life kinda exploded around me, a whole bunch of shit has happened and i've just haven't been able to get online. And to top all that off Its REALLY hard to make a barnstar (for me at least I gets all confused) though I did get instructions on how to and it is an original idea for a barnstar (that everyone can use)....Glad you liked the page though hehe --Diaboli (talk) 02:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's ok, hopefully things will work out for you :D. If you want some help with the barnstar I could help. I should warn you that I have never made barnstars before but it shouldn't be too hard once you know what you want the barnstar to look like. AngelOfSadness talk 16:41, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
i'll get the barnstar graphic done asap and send to you, then we can figure that shit out. Also last night I did something super bad on wikipedia but i HAD to do it....found this guys user page, and i loathe him (i know him from online forums and shit) I KNOW its the right guy cause he commented on the OiNK article and i know him from the site....and its funny cause no one has seen/caught me yet haha o dear, and don't you go reporting it! for once....--Diaboli (talk) 22:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok that's fine. Whatever you did, be it revenge from past encounters with the user, will probably/most likely have side effects when someone finds it. I would have recommended keeping a cool head while editing but I guess it's too late for that eh? I'm not going to go searching through edits to find it now as it's way after my bedtime and I still have a lot of stuff to get done. If I find out tomorrow that you've been blocked (Is it really that bad?) I'll take that as an indication that someone else has found it. Just, try to stay constuctive while editing on the next few hours. No point making matters worse. AngelOfSadness talk 23:27, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
eh im in no mood to actually edit stuff, i've done like 4 minor minor edits in the last 2 days, and that big ridiculous rant. It wasn't THAT bad, I mean I didn't do some mass vandalize and put untrue info and what not, i just went to the guys talk page, deleted everything off and told him that i hated him and he is a pretentious power hungry ass hole (but in like 40x more words) i might get blocked but only for a bit i think, i don't see me getting blocked for like....more than a week, if i do that is TOTALLY to much. --Diaboli (talk) 23:45, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The block should only be for a couple of days but it depends on the admin reviewing the case. One uncivil comment/rant wouldn't be a reason to have an indef block anyway so you shouldn't expect that at all. If it was just one comment and no more after that the block(if there is going to be one) shouldn't be for too long as it wasn't repeatedly done(I'm assuming). Or you might be warned and not blocked, again it depends on who finds the message and if they know what proceedures to follow. AngelOfSadness talk 00:02, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Notice of request for deletion of editor AngelOfSadness :)
AngelOfSadness, the editor you are, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that you satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space. Your opinions on yourself are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at User:R/EFD#AngelOfSadness and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit during the discussion but should not remove the editors for deletion template from the top of your userpage; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you, and have a good sense of humor :). -Goodshoped23:06, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your vandal fighting is excellent. Thankyou so much for reverting my userpage again and again, and updating the counter, which is kind of you. :-) I think I've already awarded you an anti-vandal barnstar, so I'll give you this one, for being such a special Wikipedian! :-) Lradrama18:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Cheers for the barnstar and no problemo. Many people have reverted vandalism off my pages but I know it only on the rare occasion that the vandalism counter is remembered. But I guess those people are busy reverting the vandals unconstuctive edits and trying to convince them to persist. Anyway thanks again :D AngelOfSadness talk 18:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problemo. If I find a persistant vandal, I will not cease reverting their unhelpful edits until I know that they have ceased their ways be it volunteery or by unfortunate force :) AngelOfSadness talk 22:39, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Nishkid64 would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Nishkid64 to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AngelOfSadness2. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
I will create the page if you choose to accept. I saw you were previously nominated a few months ago, but declined because you were inexperienced at the time. A few months have passed, and I believe you have gained the needed experience. I think you are fully qualified to be an administrator here, and I would be honored to nominate you. For my nominating record, see User:Nishkid64/RfAnom. Best, Nishkid64 (talk)18:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
First off, may I say thank you for your great support and also for waiting over a day for a reply. Really, it means so much to me that I can't even explain it and put it into words. Anyway, I've been thinking this over since yesterday and I'll think it's better if I wait until after Christmas possibly January. The main reason being I have stressful exams before Christmas and apparently, from what I've heard, Rfa's can be stressful so better to have the stress (if any) spread out if possible. There are still some things I want to do before starting the Rfa such as improving articles that I have promised myself that I would improve, create the article (that is currently userfied) in the mainspace, create some music templates (I know what articles need them badly) and do a bit more Xfd discussion participation. When I complete this list of things, I'll see how I feel about starting a Rfa but for now, at this moment in time, I'll have to decline this Rfa nomination. This is actually hard because part of me is screaming "Accept! Accept!!" but the other part is reminding me how my real life in the next two weeks will be: hectic, chaotic, insane seem to be the words that spring to mind. But it really really means a lot that you have so much faith in me and when I feel like I'm ready for an Rfa, I'll know who to go to for a nom but bear in mind it could possibly be a co-nom as a handful of people have asked me in the last two months. Again, cheers :D AngelOfSadness talk 20:42, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Christmas seems to get in the way of Rfa's. If I had accepted the Rfa now, chances are the list of things I have yet to do will be the reasons to oppose my Rfa (not much Xfd discussion, needs more contribution edits(creating article etc.) than vandalism reverts). If I were me I would probably oppose my own Rfa mostly because of my personal grudges with the user ;D. And also when the link turns blue, the page will appear at the top of your watchlist and that is also a wonderful change. Which reminds me to put that page on my watchlist, just in case someone nominates me without asking me first(which is what happened with the first Rfa in July). AngelOfSadness talk 12:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to apologize for that warning I gave a few months back. I have taken a break, and I know I should've assumed good, or at least neutral, faith. --Kannie | talk01:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I know but Clarkson says it as a joke which doesn't need to be added to the article. But many people who read the article and don't know about the joke will take it seriously as it was under the personal life section. Qoutes by other people are hardly ever added to articles so either way it doesn't belong there as it is unreferenced and is breaking WP:BLP if it's really true. AngelOfSadness talk 14:01, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The reason I'm inside is because there is fireworks blasting off outside and they are scaring the c*** out of me as it is. Also I have drunk enough caffine today that I will probably be awake for the next four days. But Happy New Year to you too!! :D AngelOfSadness talk 00:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I do hope that the asterisked word is "crap" and not the other word beginning with 'c' that I'm thinking of... Well, fair enough... Have a good one, pretty lady!!!! :-) ScarianCall me Pat01:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I swear a lot in my head but automatically those thoughts are censored before they escape my head so really what comes out is the equivelant of @~#[$@-", said exactly like that :D. And people are allowed to swear on this talk page so there's no need to apologise really ;) AngelOfSadness talk 01:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
While a part of me really wants me to be an admin, another part of me thinks I could do with a little more time doing major edits which I know will be a reason for people to oppose me currently if I don't fix that. Maybe in a few months time, I might accept an admin nomination but for now I would have to decline a nomination. But it means a lot to me that you would want to nominate me. :) AngelOfSadness talk 01:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
