User talk:Andyccr1Welcome
November 2018Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at SpaceX. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:15, 14 November 2018 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Immaculate Heart of Mary College, you may be blocked from editing. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 10:16, 14 November 2018 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Acacia tenuissima. Donner60 (talk) 04:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC) You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:11, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Andyccr1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Your reason here Andy chen USWCAX 04:03, 18 November 2018 (UTC) Decline reason: I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:31, 18 November 2018 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Red Star Over ChinaSomeone has removed all of your additions, which I think a pity. But you did put them in the wrong place. I suggest you put it as ==Contents==, after ==Publishing history==. And have === for your categories, to put them at a lower level. Generally, try to make them match the existing style.--GwydionM (talk) 11:58, 18 November 2018 (UTC) November 2018Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Destroyer. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - wolf 22:17, 19 November 2018 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Netherlands. GorillaWarfare (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2018 (UTC) This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Destroyer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Not going to bother with another warning template. I just removed more unsupported content, about submarine tactics, added to the destroyer article. Again, please stop editing, and seek help. Possibly a mentor. - wolf 06:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC) added question(edit conflict)Can you explain your editing style? You are jumping back and forth among a half dozen, completely disparate articles, adding unsupported content to each one, only minutes apart. This is part of your problem. Focus on one article (or at least one topic) at time. Review the page, copy/edit if needed, but research it through reliable sources, and then if necessary to improve the page, add or change content, correctly, and cite your source(s) so that your changes are supported. And seriously consider mentorship. - wolf 06:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC) destroyer, againYou just posted a "help me" notice. You haven't asked any questions, despite my prompt. And despite everything I just posted above, and the edits you made to Destroyer that I had to revert... you again just made another unsupported, unexplained edit to that article. Please stop editing articles until you have begun some communication, with me or anyone, here on this talk page. Also, please state (if you can) if English is not your first language. Thanks - wolf 07:02, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
BlockedIf you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} . Materialscientist (talk) 07:20, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:
Andyccr1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) UTRS appeal #23351 was submitted on Nov 23, 2018 04:33:29. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 04:33, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyccr1 (talk • contribs) 10:06, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
请阁下停止滥用{{unblock}}模板请阁下注意,在使用unblock模板时,必须配上您请求解锁的原因。如果您不配上原因,将被算作滥用unblock模板。请立即停止并删去unblock模板。否则,您将被禁止编辑自己的讨论页。谢谢配合 Thank you-LabMem No.SHJJ Contact Me 08:30, 24 November 2018 (UTC) unblock
unblock
November 2018Hello, Andyccr1, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, maybe, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Chinese; did you know there is a Chinese Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! 您好,Andyccr1。歡迎來訪英文版的維基百科。雖然我們隨時歡迎您在英文版維基百科編輯,但是您執筆所使用的英文可能並未達到英文版維基百科所需求的水準。若是您不介意的話,可以在中文維基百科進行編輯。最後,感謝您參加維基百科。 您好,Andyccr1。 欢迎来访英文版的维基百科。虽然我们随时欢迎您在英文版维基百科编辑,但是您执笔所使用的英文可能并未达到英文版维基百科所需求的水准。若是您不介意的话,可以在中文维基百科进行编辑。最后,感谢您参加维基百科。--Ehime«…» 11:37, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Follow up@Jimmyshjj: and @Ehime:, have you been able communicate with Andyccr? Do you have any kind of update? Thanks - wolf 22:02, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Attention needed
It seems likely that this user uses a sock AndyUSWCAX (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and makes disruptive edits. Sorry for putting the template here. -- Ehime«…» 10:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC) |