User talk:Andrewincowtown
Your submission at Articles for creation: Adena Williams Loston (May 15) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
First, I will indeed re-write and re-submit the article in accordance with the suggested changes. I appreciate the constructive criticism, which will no doubt improve the article. Second, I also appreciate the kind approach, and the encouragement of a new editor such as myself. Thank you. More soon! Andrewincowtown (talk) 18:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Adena Williams Loston (May 15) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Adena Williams Loston (May 15) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Adena Williams Loston has been accepted Adena Williams Loston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister talk 04:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)August 2016Please do not add or change content, as you did at San Jacinto College, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
Best wishes, Andrewincowtown (talk) 23:13, 26 August 2016 (UTC) Image without licenseUnspecified source/license for File:Https---upload.wikimedia.org-wikipedia-en-e-e0-Language of Protest.jpgThanks for uploading File:Https---upload.wikimedia.org-wikipedia-en-e-e0-Language of Protest.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like For more information on using images, see the following pages: This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 02:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Https---upload.wikimedia.org-wikipedia-en-e-e0-Language of Protest.jpgThanks for uploading File:Https---upload.wikimedia.org-wikipedia-en-e-e0-Language of Protest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:22, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
I have recently posted to the Draft section a proposed new article of a living person, Mary Lynne Gasaway Hill, and I am requesting review of the article
because I have a Conflict of interest (COI)- I am related to the subject of the article. I will also put up a request for review of the article in the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Thank you. Best wishes, Andrewincowtown (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
COI on Draft:Mary Lynne Gasaway HillThanks for mentioning your COI on the above article. I'll leave a note next on how to properly declare it on your user page, but basically at minimum you need a sentence saying "I have a COI with respect to Draft:Mary Lynne Gasaway Hill." --- Possibly ☎ 02:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Again, thanks! Andrewincowtown (talk) 23:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC) Managing a conflict of interestHello, Andrewincowtown. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --- Possibly ☎ 02:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussionThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. --- Possibly ☎ 16:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of User:AndrewincowtownA tag has been placed on User:Andrewincowtown requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 16:12, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
By way of explanation, I can only offer that when I set up the page years ago, I thought of it as a traditional "Bio" page, and have not thought about it much since. However, I completely agree that it was not inline with Wikipedia guidelines. I hope it is now. Best wishes, Andrewincowtown (talk) 17:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC) Contested deletionThis page should not be speedily deleted because I will promptly address the issue. Thank you for notifying me of the issue. Best wishes, Andrewincowtown (talk) 16:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
|