|
User talk:Andrew c/archive11
DuplicatesHi Andrew c. FYI, the following three images are duplicates now, so I plan to delete them, unless you have any objection:[1][2][3]Ferrylodge (talk) 23:20, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for accidental deletionsAndrew, thanks for your diligence on maintaining some of the references that I accidentally deleted. I apologize for my carelessness.--IronAngelAlice (talk) 09:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC) About "fake move attack"So I hope you see archive118 again, I reported this attack at WP:AIV 8 times (from 2 December 2007 to 21 December 2007) , At the 8th time , some administrator told me to report here. This guy comes back again today , he uses ip 64.24.84.3 to add information of a fake movie Tom & Jerry: The Great Beginning into Barney Bear, thanks for giving a hand for this.123.193.12.44 (talk) 22:53, 26 January 2008 (UTC) I responded to you on Quadell's page Thanks, NancyHeise (talk) 05:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Follow up on your suggestionI have followed up here on your suggestion. Flibirigit (talk) 22:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC) HelloHello Andrew c, I like your userpage and we seem to have several interests in common. I hope to see more of your edits in the near future. --Grrrlriot (talk) 02:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC) Your deletion of pro-choice for men contentThe information that was provided did not present a female vs male position. I take it that you are not familiar with cases from canada , The UK and USA dealing with pro-choice for men. Generally these cases are not at conflict with pro-choice for women. Even American TV host Dr. Phil on his TV show which aired April 26, 2006, agreed with pro-choice for men and the USA case of Matt Dubay which has been named "Roe v. Wade - for Men" In Canada, we have a few cases now which are pro-choice for men legal cases. There is one case in Australia heading for the Australian High Court ( Australia's highest court ) Since you apparently don't understand the concepts perhaps you could undo your deletion of the changes I made to make the pro-choice web page less sexist and address both pro-choice for men and pro-choice for women. Your view seems to be influenced by your lack of knowledge on the subject. I have been quoted by the international press on these matters and have a degree in "women's studies" from the early 70's. Perhaps you should learn more about masculist issues and gender equality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.14.7.68 (talk) 07:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Just to let you knowI've cleaned up most of the stuff regarding those fetal images, but I'd appreciate your input over on Commons.--Nilfanion (talk) 11:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC) First Epistle to Timothy article - helpHi Andrew, would appreciate some help on First Epistle to Timothy. Two problems appear to stand out:
TIA, Mercury543210 (talk) 22:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Happy Valentine's Day! FLc is wishing you a Happy Valentine's Day! This greeting promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Spread the love by adding {{subst:User:Flaminglawyer/HapValDay!}} to their talk page with a friendly message. about the deletionHello. Ok the deletion in Mar article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ASEOR (talk • contribs) 02:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC) Hey why the deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ASEOR2 (talk • contribs) 11:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC) Why are you picking on me4?That comment on my Discussion page is extremely rude. If that is how you talk to people because "its not what you believe in" is wrong and I am quite upset now. If this is how you treat fellow wikipedian's who try and make a difference then your attitude is wrong.--PoliceCameraActionFan (talk) 16:19, 10 February 2008 (UTC) Lock graphicAgain, I want to say thanks for making the lock graphic. Cheers. miranda 17:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC) race for lifeThanks for picking up and remedying my accidental chaos - trying to do things too quickly and not checking the results! Must have left my finger on the mouse a fraction too long! Thanks. PamD (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Article about The ForeshadowingHi Andrew c I just wanted to ask you if there could be a possibility to have my article about The Foreshadowing undeleted. The reason why I ask it come from the fact I'm not an expert and it was the first time i wrote an article on wikipedia, so I surely made some mistakes. There are two things I still haven't understood about wikipedia: 1)my article is based on several interviews and reviews about the band I read from several webzine or myspace. I read somewhere that before creating an article I should provide references to reliable sources, but I don't know how the proceed works. Can you eplain it to me please? 2) same goes by the picture. I mean, I don't know the proceed to license an image under the GFDL, i read it but I don't find it clear. Naturally I have no problems in inserting the image because I was given the permission by Alessandro, who's The Foreshadowing guitar player and close friend of mine. Thanks a lot Howitzer666Howitzer666 (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Re: Weird editOoops, thanks for catching that. Silly rabbit (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2008 (UTC) HeyPleasure seeing you again, take care :) delldot talk 00:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC) Cemal GurselThe administrator who placed the tags is active and on-board today. And yet, I see no work coming from him other than the passive aggressive delay with your collaboration. Please see the following as well and some other images that administrator has removed such tags himself without legitimate basis contrary to what you defend. Can you clarify specific issues with these image tags today before any damaga is done to the photos and the article which will not be well tolerated. Thanks. Leblebi (talk) 18:17, 23 February 2008 (UTC) "Should not there be an explanation as to what the concern was in a valid way before putting a PUI (whatever that stands for)and reassuring that this was not used as an excuse to abuse the article and its contributors by misusing administrator privileges? I much appreciate your statement "I'll investigate further into this matter to see if and how these images may be problematic. " and will look forward to your further guidance but I am sure you have noticed that not only the discussion tag but whole discussion board with legitimate concerns expressed therein was erased by that administrator before. As far as I see it is immediately obvious that there has never been any problem with these images and copyright clarifications until deliberate oppositional defiant targeting by certain parties who even erased a legitimate sound file from this article. Where would be an appropirate forum to notify and complain about administrator abuse in Wiki?"
Image:ArmyGames.jpg clearly indicated “From his family album and personal collection” and it is also a government photo declared heritage. There should be no problem there. Making fair use claims does not negate against public domain. It seems extra but does not make abuse by an administrator OK. Image:WithACadet.jpg indicates the same “From his family album and personal collection” as to the ownership of the copyright and further fair use statements are provided, which do not again negate against the image legitimacy. Perhaps the absurdity of the abusive admin interaction becomes most obvious at the Image:Harb&istiklalmedal.JPG and all of its history with appropriate tags. Please remove the tags that you protect or have an administrator remove it as Ricky81682 appears to be hiding in silence. The following two images were processed by that administrator Ricky81682 with no appropriate license assurances and the questioning tags were vandalized by him while he abuses other article images with fictitious concerns and failing to rectify his mistakes despite good faith discussion attempts. More interestingly, he adds fictitous licenses at images put in wiki by other users in those specific images. Than he goes and removes PUI tags while he puts same tags in other’s work to damage. See below: Image:Image-TJC Logo.jpg • (cur) (last) 01:43, 19 February 2008 Ricky81682 (Talk | contribs) m (757 bytes) (Reverted edits by 71.184.9.231 (talk) to last version by Ricky81682) (undo) • (cur) (last) 01:32, 19 February 2008 71.184.9.231 (Talk) (1,134 bytes) (undo) • (cur) (last) 01:31, 19 February 2008 Ricky81682 (Talk | contribs) (757 bytes) (license) (undo) India Sex.jpg 01:30, 19 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Image:India Sex.jpg • (cur) (last) 01:40, 19 February 2008 Ricky81682 (Talk | contribs) m (390 bytes) (Reverted edits by 71.184.9.231 (talk) to last version by Ricky81682) (undo) • (cur) (last) 01:30, 19 February 2008 71.184.9.231 (Talk) (768 bytes) (undo) • (cur) (last) 01:22, 19 February 2008 Ricky81682 (Talk | contribs) (390 bytes) (added license) (undo) The same administrator Ricky81682 covered up the following vandalized sound file despite appropriate copyright tags at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:CemalGursel1963.ogg. 14:15, 16 February 2008 Rettetast (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:CemalGursel1963.ogg" (Speedy deleted per (CSD G12), was a blatant copyright infringement. using TW) 14:15, 16 February 2008 (hist) (diff) Cemal Gürsel (Removing instance of image CemalGursel1963.ogg that has been speedily deleted per (CSD G12); using TW) He erased all goodfaith discussion attempts at the above sound page including all of its log files to prevent traceability and responsibility. Leblebi (talk) 22:24, 23 February 2008 (UTC) FYI [7] Slrubenstein | Talk 15:06, 29 February 2008 (UTC) New UserI'm new to wikipedia, and very interested in adding to the Jesus article, which is semi-protected. Could someone get back to me with some basic advice? I have some fascinating material. Sahansdal (talk) 05:44, 3 March 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the amendment!Thanks Andrew c for that comment. It seems that I'm not really clear of the image tag policy and such. So far, images I download always listed for deletion. If it's possible, could you give me some ways and tips to upload image and give it's license. Once again, Thank you for the amendment. Muhammad Hanif (talk) 12:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC) Thanks for your replyJust wanted to thank you for your reply at my talk page. It's good stuff.Ferrylodge (talk) 02:44, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
DoD photo cleanupHi, please overwrite this over the original so we can close this, thanks! Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 20:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Hi Andrew, long time no see! Is it worth asking this guy not to use rollback to remove perfectly sensible posts like yours & mine (& others) from his talk page? Johnbod (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
DC Meetup on May 17thYour help is needed in planning Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 4! Any comments or suggestions you have are greatly appreciated. The Placebo Effect (talk) 18:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Fetus pageAndrew, I liked your edit regarding the 8 week vs. 9 week situation. I also want to respond to your question regarding this subject: Condition at the beginning of fetal stage - the diff under argument is here: [8] I want to respond to this on your talk page first because I don't want to get into yet another endless argument. But, I do want to give you some background as to what happened from my point of view, and get your thoughts. My edits were done because two paragraphs next to each other conflicted. It isn't entirely apparent at first in the diffs, but one paragraph titled "8 weeks (condition at start of fetal stage)," and a second paragraph right below it titled "8 to 15 weeks" had basically the same information - only the information in the first paragraph was taken out of context, while the information in the second paragraph was into context. In essence, the first paragraph (under the title "8 weeks (condition at start of fetal stage)") became a place for Ferrylodge to highlight information he felt was important - especially medical studies taken out of context. For example, one of the sentences said "In addition to sideward bendings of the head, complex and generalized movements occur, with movements and startles that involve the whole body." Out of context, this sentence makes it seem as though an 8-week-old zygote has control over motor function. This couldn't be further from the truth as noted in sources in the second paragraph (under the title "8 to 15 weeks"). So, essentially, I combined the information in both paragraphs, putting like information together. I would be happy to post the above paragraph to the article's discussion page. I just thought I'd post it here first because it is obviously polemic by making a statement about the bad-faith edits of Ferrylodge - which may or may not be fair. Any feedback would be welcomed.--IronAngelAlice (talk) 23:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC) DYK updateIs overdue, been 8 hrs since last one. Mjroots (talk) 22:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC) JewishI did not add category without source, I categorize Jessalyn Gilsig, Alain Chabat and Cedric Klapisch, when a cedric klapisch see on the french wikipedia, it is said that he's born in a Jewish family, why threaten blockage while I was no vandalism.--SamuelM555 (talk) 14:23, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Lise Simms and the othersI just protected Lise Simms, A. J. Langer, Devon Odessa, Jordana Spiro, Abigail Spencer and Sandy Robson. I really don't feel like another round of the overlinking vandal. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 04:44, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Crucifixion eclipseThank you for correcting the recent adjustments to this article. Tcisco (talk) 05:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC) ChristadelphiansI discovered this group put the oddest references back to their main page in several other wikipedia articles, which I'd fixed previously. When I googled them, I found a lot of references to them being a cult. I do have a personal pet-peeve about various groups I've seen exploiting Wikipedia for reasons of religion, politics, fanboyism, and even the odd porn site ad. So I decided to do a thorough search for the keyword, and found them linking back to their main page in quite a few pages that didn't seem to add anything. I probably should have posted a question in the talk section asking if anyone else has heard of them. I just didn't think they were relevant, or that anyone would care (and religious articles are already so terrible long as everyone tries to get their say.) I'll review and see if we can keep things concise without minimizing their content too much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pjh3000 (talk • contribs) 03:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Sources at STIHi. This is only to advise you that i have just sourced this Cibao International Airport, with all the refferences and sources that it was needed. I remove the tag of ``unreffered`` that somebody adds to the article, because it is not nessesary any more. have a nice night. Lacreta (talk) 04:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC) I question whether the link you deleted fits more in the "spam" category than it does in the "legitimate" category. The website certainly appears to be a link to a real parish. Granted there are a couple of small ad links at the top, but lots of external links in Wikipedia have those. But you may have reasons for deleting it that I am not aware of. I'm interest in you opinion. Note that I had nothing to do with adding the link. Thanks. Ward3001 (talk) 15:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
STIHey, i toke your example and i tried to do the best sourcing an cleaning up the article. I have not finish to sourced at all yet, i'll finish by today adding refferences to sentences that i know there is a source or other citation in other website. Thanks for your help. Have a nice day!! Lacreta (talk) 10:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC) AfD nomination of Jesus H. Christ An editor has nominated Jesus H. Christ, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jesus H. Christ and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC) RFCWould you please take a look at WP:Requests for comment/89.242.164.114 and sign it if you agree? thanks. Tb (talk) 18:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC) reorg of AMHYou rightly said that Abortion and mental health is a mess. Do you have any thoughts about the structure a reorg should take? Sbowers3 (talk) 23:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC) History of County WexfordAm sorting this out. Have removed many links. Now working on dates. Thanks for your help and suggestions Can you please have a look at the "References & Footnotes" section to see if the format is ok. Thanks. Dneale52 (talk) 02:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC) HiHi i posted a reply to your concerns on the relevant talk page. Realist2 (talk) 14:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC) Thanks. I've made a lot of changes, especially rearranging References and Footnotes, and adding references to some sections. Can you have a look when you get a chance, please, and tell me what more needs doing (to History of County Wexford page). Dneale52 (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC) History of County Wexford - Page VandalizedThe page appears to have been Vandalized since my last note. One version of the page appears when I am logged in and another when I am not. Have a look anyhow and see if the tag can be removed. Thanks. I had removed all, or nearly all, of the unnecesary links. All Sources had been arranged in alphabetical order, and ISBN no.s provided where available. Many additional Sources were listed. Many additional references had been provided. Some changes had been made to wording of certain sections. I also added an image of 'Vinegar Hill' (this is a way to recognize the correct version of the page if you are checking it). I am leaving the page for now, as I had put a lot of work into it, but now am unsure if my edits are being saved. Dneale52 (talk) 01:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC) For your eyes only (well not quite)See here. It shows
I have also added a further message on the relevant talk page. Realist2 (talk) 15:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC) Jesus.jpgI've run into a similar problem before and I know how to work around it - what is the timestamp of the version that needs to be deleted? —Random832 (contribs) 17:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
A proposalHi Andrew, Could you please take a look at my proposal here [9]. I think this is important given the current waves of secular attacks on all religions. Thanks in advance.--Be happy!! (talk) 07:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC) List of Chicago street gangs Another editor has added the /Haga lo que a usted le de su santa gana con esa imagen, para que usted me pregunta de eso si ya borro el articulo??? borrela o haga lo que usted quiera con ella, ya no me importa!! La verdad es que yo pense que usted era una muy buena persona a la cual dirigirse para algun consejo, pero parece que usted nada mas esta para quitar y deshacer el esfuerzo que ha empeñado otro en algun articulo. Se le agradece su colaboracion, que para nada me sirvio. ChezSant (talk) 23:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC) i know that wikipedia is in spanish too! and, sorry if you want to know what do i wrote abobe, go to a freeonline translator and translate it as i do. ChezSant (talk) 00:04, 8 April 2008 (UTC) Revelation dismissalThanks. SmokeyTheCat •TALK• 06:34, 9 April 2008 (UTC) a new article for DYKHello, Andrew, there is a new article on a Chinese athlete Jin Jing. We want to push this article onto the "Did you know" on the main page. Could you give us some comments on the talk page of that article? How should we improve that article? If it's a good one, could you please help us put this article onto the "Did you know"? The question could be '[Jin Jing|Who] is called the "Smiling Angel in Wheelchair" by Chinese people?' Thanks!--Supportjinjing (talk) 23:30, 10 April 2008 (UTC) Hi, I see you recently found and removed a Copy vio from this article. FWIW, I went back and took a look at the article history and found that the material in question was added by IP72.16.221.126 on November 72007. Although it doesn't appear that he's made any contribs since, I dropped him a cv warning at User talk:72.16.221.126 anyway. Cheers, JGHowes talk - 21:02, 11 April 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the information. When do the reverts expire? Danny. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannyza1981 (talk • contribs) 20:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC) I understand that... The last comment in the talk dialog, aside from mine is dated: 207.239.111.117 12:51, 21 August 2007 It wasn't clear to me that the page was under discussion, and that people were changing it, and fixing it. Anyway, I have posted my proposal on the talk page.... I'm learning all the time here. It takes some getting used to. This page is one of the few I've been involved in a major edit. Thanks for the help though. Dannyza1981 (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Help neededHi, I need help from an admin. The 30 March 2008 I've tagged this image as NowCommons, after moved it on commons. The image haas been deleted here, but yesterday it has been deleted on commons too. I suppose that it must be recovered, but I don't know where to ask for this. Could you do it? Bye Jalo 11:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
|
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Human_fetus_-_40_weeks_-_B%26W.jpg){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Human_fetus_-_6_weeks_-_B%26W.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Human-fetus---20-weeks---B%26.jpg){kind=link}
