This is a Wikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AndreJustAndre/Archives/58.
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our WikiWednesday Salon, with in-person at Brooklyn Public Library by Grand Army Plaza, in the Central Library's Info Commons Lab, as well as an online-based participation option. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome!
We are proud to announce that monthly PIZZA has returned!
All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Brooklyn Public Library encourages the wearing of masks when indoors, and especially be mindful of those in your proximity.
The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for a pair of special events this weekend as we wrap up Earth Week! No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome.
Hello! I just wanted to give you a fair heads up that, with some hesitation, I reverted your content removal from Twitter files. I think you're probably right about some of the sources, but what really caught my eye was the ref name "Grynbaum"โI recognized that as a NYT writer, and, indeed, that reference was to his NYT article, which detailed what Kevin McCarthy had said while on Fox News. Even if Fox News is generally unreliable, I don't think that means it's objectionable to use a New York Times article quoting what the Speaker of the House said on Fox.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 13:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds great! Sorry that I didn't restore those portions of your edit myselfโin hindsight, I should have, but, at the time, I figured it would be smarter to make sure you weren't preferring an all-or-nothing approach.--Jerome Frank Disciple (talk) 14:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
Technical news
Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our WikiWednesday Salon, with in-person at Brooklyn Public Library by Grand Army Plaza, in the Central Library's Info Commons Lab, as well as an online-based participation option. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome!
We are proud to announce that monthly PIZZA has returned!
All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Brooklyn Public Library encourages the wearing of masks when indoors, and especially be mindful of those in your proximity.
Excellent source about Durham's own failures and political biases
John Durhamโs Investigation Has Disclosed Corruption: His Own. The Barr-appointed special counsel was supposed to reveal โthe crime of the century.โ All he revealed was his incompetenceโand worse.[1]
Your recent editing history at Republican Party (United States) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editingโespecially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's workโwhether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each timeโcounts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warringโeven if you do not violate the three-revert ruleโshould your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chances last a finite time (talk) 18:29, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@โฑฎ If he wants to erase edits, he should explain why directly and not in a misleading way. [1] "need to use source as a reference in the article" makes no sense as a reason to undo edits when the source was already used as a reference in the article. Chances last a finite time (talk) 18:36, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I resigned in 2018 after making a few mistakes and actions/comments, some of which were rather ill-conceived and I regret. If you really wish to exhume the remains they're all in the history of various talk pages. There was a pending arbcom case being brought against me so I resigned instead, under a cloud as they say. to spare the community and myself the pain and frustration of that. Andre๐17:52, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I saw your name on the editor's assistance list so I decided to reach out for assistance. I made a revision to Manu Rรญos under the Personal Life section. I was reverted. I disagree but I didn't want to get into an edit war so I reached out on the other editor's talk page. I didn't get a response there so then I reached out on the talk page of the main article, asking for discussion. I have not received a response there either. What should I do now? Should I now ask for a third party? Thanks in advance. Clockswatcher (talk) 17:42, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
Technical news
Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
Arbitration
The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
We are proud to announce that monthly food has returned!
All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct. In addition, to participate in person you should be vaccinated and also be sure to respect others' personal space, and we may limit overall attendance size if appropriate. Prime Produce encourages the wearing of masks when indoors, and especially be mindful of those in your proximity.
Oy vey. This should be closed and the IP warned if not blocked. They're accusing me of antisemitism and neonazism because they believe any genetic analysis of Jews (I am Jewish as I explained) is that, and they want to delete any scientific genetic article and replace with their own fringe religious views. Andre๐12:27, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Concerning Biden Ukraine conspiracy theory; Not all content is "conspiracy theory"
I noticed you were the first to make an edit that looked like a !vote, but there isn't an RfC, so what is going on with all the uninvolved editors popping in? DN (talk) 02:29, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
.jpg)
