|
User talk:AndreJustAndre/Archives/34
Removing votesHi Andre, Some things really shouldn't be argued on substantive grounds. Deleting "votes" on subjective, even apparently good, subjective grounds is forbidden, and it certainly is not within the province of RfA participants. Sometime a firm no with minimum embellishment is the right answer for a 'crat to give. Cheers! Cecropia 14:59, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
John Favalora & Archdiocese of Miami DisputesPlease let me know if you need me to join the "Talk" about these Wikipedia articles. I have communicated my concerns to you and to the Administrators' Bulletin Board of Wikipedia. I would be happy to address the anonymous poster of the links to my website directly. Do you know if this individual is willing to engage in a honest dialog? I recommend this person read the explanation of "gay-friendly" parishes and colleges on my web site - www.cclonline.org. Here it is: "The Catholic parishes, retreat centers and educational institutions shown are those we are aware of that are not actively homophobic, have compassionate and listening ministries, and welcome all to be one in the Spirit." This has nothing to do with pedophile priests, "gay" pastors, or the "church sanctioned homosexual underground" this person seems so eager to prove. We are not and never have been in any formal or informal contact with anyone in the Archdiocese of Miami. This individual is using information from my site in a way that is very dishonest and devious. In their attempt to prove their dubious points they seem quite willing to hurt many innocent people. They are entitled to their opinion, but they are not entitled to their own set of facts. The information in Wikipedia should be based on facts, not conjucture, or used to market political agendas and organizations. AnnPavlosky
Ryulong RFCI don't believe it's canvassing to bring this up, as you mentioned something before, and I need a second person to sign off on it. I've reopened it: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ryulong. I've also not been able to complete it as fully as I would like; any input would be appreciated. The Evil Spartan 20:29, 30 July 2007 (UTC) thank youthank you for changing my username(: Your buttons bannerThey're awesome. Can I steal your idea? The Welcomer 05:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC) Only welcomesI had an account a while ago, but decided to make this one and do mostly welcomes. Not sure how it'll go yet. — The Welcomer • (talk) • 03:35, August 1, 2007 (UTC)
Bot Flags
Reply on Adminship questionHi there. Thanks for your message. :) I would definitely be interested in a nomination for adminship. :) But I have two questions for you. First, may I ask what your reasoning is for nominating me, especially if you're choosing me over anyone else who's been involved in CVGProj? Second, given that I recently had a major dispute with JAF1970 and that I feel I didn't handle it the best way possible, do you think this is a good time to go forward with a nomination? I am interested in helping out as a WP administrator, and I believe I could be a fair and responsible admin. I'm not entirely sure how much time I'd be able to devote to it, though. Still, thank you for thinking of me. :) — KieferSkunk (talk) — 04:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC) SubstingI have reverted your additions, as they caused large parserfunctions to show in the text. I'll fix the BRFA template, then redo. Sorry about that! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 05:17, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Oh hey, since you're apparently familiar with template code, could you take a look at User:KieferSkunk/furvg and tell me how to fix the fact that parsercode is showing up in the output when I use
I see we were thinking the same thing! Flyguy649 talk contribs 02:51, 2 August 2007 (UTC) On Star Control racesNot as problematic as one article anywhere that size. I must unfortunatelty dash to work now, I'll be back online as soon as I can. (The workplace's having a very slow day.) I hope that I can remain polite and reasonable and that we can resolve this amiably. --Kizor 05:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Hey, what's up with the deletion of this template? It was used on several articles, and you seem to have deleted it without any discussion whatsoever. It's one thing to be bold and merge articles without discussion; if people disagree, they can revert and you can talk it out. Deleting a template used on several articles, though, should at least involve some discussion before you invoke IAR... as it is now, your merges have been reverted and you've left several articles with ugly red links where their templates used to be. Restore the template for now, please? --Aquillion 05:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
SocksI'm more than aware of the page you point out, and as one of the editors on the WP:WA project who knows all the parties concerned and know of the circumstances in which the claimed evidence may depending on how it is viewed may suggest otherwise. I think the key issue here is that no oversight has been conducted here by Mackessen by referring the issue to another Checkuser for their action, not withstanding that a checkuser case was not opened by him. This is not withstanding that the developing consensus on AN does not support the view. Additionally, the claim that Rebecca has made the allegation is simply a patent misrepresentation of what she has said (diff). I would kindly appreciate you restoring the alledged portion of your comments on the RFC if only to show an assumption of good faith, particularly since the allegations at this stage are not proven, otherwise it runs the risk of being seen by outside observers as an attempt to stack the vote. Thewinchester (talk) 05:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC) Concerning Changed UsernamesHi Andrew Thank you very much for taking the time to approve my username change request, but is there anything you can do to eliminate the original, now blanked user page here? The whole reason why I changed my username was to hide my edit content from others that found out I was the holder of that username. Now that the original user page redirects to my new Username, it partially defeats the purpose of my username change ;_; Is there anything you can do to help me with this issue? 0reteki 05:14, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Too Easy Huh?Are you kidding? Take your threats and shove em.Hexrei 17:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Star Control? DIDN'T YOU MEAN TO ASK ME ABOUT FLOWERS? Thank youThanks, Andre, for the barnstar. I really appreciate it. And thanks for taking my rather snippy post so well last week. Cheers, and keep up the good work. ElinorD (talk) 20:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC) ThanksMany thanks for changing my username. And may I add that that was remarkably fast - only 3mins! Chris.B 20:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC) User Name ChangesHi. Are you an administrator who handles user name changes? If so, I have a question for you. Please let me know. Thanks. You can reply at my Talk Page. Thanks. (JosephASpadaro 22:49, 3 August 2007 (UTC))
Hey, maybe we should just tag it as {{guideline}} and see if anyone objects? --Deskana (banana) 11:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC) Thank youThank you for your edits Hispanic Americans in World War II looks much better now thanks to you . Tony the Marine 22:11, 4 August 2007 (UTC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
