User talk:Anay jain

Ujjwal Patni

Hi there and welcome to Wikipedia. It seems we're at a bit of an impasse regarding the article. Rather than reverting edits and engaging in edit warring I invite to you bring forth any questions or comments on the talk page. Please refer to WP's guidance on notability, verification, and reliable sources, as well as guidance regarding puffery.

Furthermore, I believe the following WP policy statement identifies a major probem with the Ujjwal Patni article.

“Even with well-sourced material, if you use it out of context, or to advance a position not directly and explicitly supported by the source, you are engaging in original research...In general, article statements should not rely on unclear or inconsistent passages, or on passing comments. Passages open to multiple interpretations should be precisely cited or avoided. A summary of extensive discussion should reflect the conclusions of the source. Drawing conclusions not evident in the reference is original research regardless of the type of source. It is important that references be cited in context and on topic.”

WP policy on neutrality is also applicable. Rhode Island Red (talk)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mahaveerji for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:51, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]