User talk:Anatashala

Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave a message for me here and I'll reply to you on this page :)

Flyer22 and WanderingWanda arbitration case opened

The Arbitration Committee has accepted and opened the Flyer22 and WanderingWanda case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 30, which is when the evidence phase is scheduled to close. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda/Workshop, which closes January 13, 2020. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. To opt out of future mailings please see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Flyer22 and WanderingWanda/Notification list. For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Hello anatashala.Could you elaborate on my editing being vandalism? For example my reference to an interview with Emilia Clarke was properly cited and was neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marsh McCor (talk • contribs) 19:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Marsh McCor:

I'll go over what I reverted:

In this edit, you added a statement for which you did not include a source. I checked the ref following the statement but I can’t see where it supports your added statement made in the aforementioned edit (Other critics said the writers purposefully tried to make the ending as divisive as possible.) I don't think this particular edit is vandalism but an unsourced assertion.



In this edit, you switched around the characters’ names. I’m trying to assume good faith but this edit appears to resemble vandalism. From this edit and this edit, you do seem familiar enough with the eighth season of Game of Thrones to form these opinions (which I reverted as these do not adhere to WP:NPOV or WP:PLOT and you’re changing correct spellings to misspellings) to be aware that Sansa is not Daenerys and Daenerys is not Sansa. You also switched around the actors’ names to mismatch with the characters they portray in this edit, which can also resemble vandalism.

You then proceed to undo the revision I did of your edit switching around character names and you add a piece of unsourced information in this edit(They also wanted to create one of the most controversial series endings of all time), both of which ClueBot NG reverted, citing possible vandalism. This ref does not appear to support the statement you added.

In this edit, you removed a sourced piece of information without providing a reason. I’m not sure why you removed this?

I hope that helps explains things and perhaps can illuminate why some of your edits (ie. switching around actor and character names, adding personal assertions to the plot) can appear to be unconstructive and in some cases, vandalism. Meanwhile, please see WP:Reliable sources for how to source statements in articles as I think that would be a helpful link to guide you in this area. Anatashala (talk) 20:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]





ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jon Snow (character)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:31, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]