User talk:Amberrock/Archive 13

The following discussion is an archived talkpage of Amberrock below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on Amberrock's live user talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.

I see you're annoyed with the revision here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=S%C3%A9l%C3%A9ka_CPSK-CPJP-UFDR&diff=547045377&oldid=547039350 , but please don't leave snarky cite (you left a citation for two writing style books).
I reviewed many of your edits. Thanks much for your awesome attention to detail!
J_Tom_Moon_79 (talk) 04:20, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response on your talk page.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 07:58, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please move the former Mario Goossens page to my Userspace? Thank you very much! --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:05, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Response on your talk page.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 20:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Franco Debono, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nationalist Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Being an editor apart of the Game of Thrones series, can you please come and join the discussion over on Talk:List of Game of Thrones characters re Gendry and his place on the characters that would be great. MisterShiney ✉ 15:42, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you've seen it but.. you might get a giggle from this. MisterShiney ✉ 23:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did. Thanks for that piece of humour, mate! —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 23:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I also worked out what the problem with those tables were too! I think I woke my housemates up with the shout of joy lol. MisterShiney ✉ 23:22, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Suzanne Mizzi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GOT Walk of Punishment.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:02, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this screenshot doesn't satisfy the criteria, then you got a whole lot of other screenshots in hundreds of other television episode articles ahead of you to delete... Let's see how the discussion unfolds. —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 18:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the article for Salem, New Jersey again added the Template:Inadequate lead. The tag adds nothing to the article, and if anything just makes it worse. As always, tagging an article is a last resort. If you believe that the lead needs to be updated to add additional context, update away, which might have a reasonable likelihood of improving the article. Alansohn (talk) 20:55, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've put my response on your talk page.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 21:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not anyone's maid, nor is any other editor. With all due respect, if you see a problem then fix it; Tagging must be an absolute last resort. For example, I have just tagged an entry in an article as needing a source, but I actually did the research to try to find one. Once I couldn't find the source I actually contacted someone who might be able to address the issue. Try editing the article and see how it works. It's lots of fun and tends to improve the encyclopedia. Alansohn (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've put my response on your talk page.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 21:33, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amber, this guy put a nasty comment on one of my edits too. He quoted some Wiki rule that was completely incorrect, then barked some order at me. Seems like an angry know-it-all who takes pleasure in these "drive by" comments. I wouldn't pay much attention.

I looked at some of your stuff. Thanks for your hard work and great edits!

Richard Apple (talk) 23:45, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amberrock, I noticed you tagged Dan Hildebrand for deletion via BLPPROD, but the article has one source, so it isn't subject to BLPPROD. I've removed the tag. While IMDb may not be a reliable source, it's incorrect to call the article unreferenced altogether (the existing tag, {{BLP IMDb refimprove}}, is accurate). You may still tag the article for deletion via a regular PROD; I wouldn't object. --BDD (talk) 21:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'll do that instead.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 21:15, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GOT Bolton Dark Wings Dark Words.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:17, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Amberrock/Archive 13! If we have not met, I'm AutomaticStrikeout. I've come here to ask you to take part in the survey at User:AutomaticStrikeout/Are admins interested in a RfB?. I am trying to gauge the general level of interest that administrators have in running for cratship, as well as pinpoint the factors that affect that interest level. Your input will be appreciated. Happy editing, AutomaticStrikeout (T • C • Sign AAPT) 01:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comments at Template:Did you know nominations/International Conference on Hollywoodism, please see my response there and the changes to the article I've made. Wasted Time R (talk) 04:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited De puinhopen van acht jaar Paars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Waiting list (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Even though you're a robot, I will clear up this misunderstanding (so the non-robots strolling by will know as well). This linking was done consciously, since none of the linked examples fit the intended meaning within the Puinhopen-article.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 13:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mkdw^talk 05:43, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Done Mkdw^talk 08:01, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I doesn't really belong to Template:Did you know nominations/Matthias Eisenberg: I may have a language problem. It is unusual that a Protestant Church musician and a Jewish Israeli (mostly) Klezmer clarinetist play together, because their culture is different and their approach to music is different. Why do you think of hate? I think of peace. I heard them, that concert and others - they succeed making a statement for peace! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You asked if this was my lucky day. Certainly luckier than yesterday, when two words entered my talk that were not mentioned there before, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:59, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your great help. Cheers. CeeGee 17:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

No problem, mate!—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 17:12, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Thank you for your work at the DYK's. You presented solid feedback that I responded to while allowing me to explain decisions towards the article's wording. A very pleasant experience and your diplomacy was resolute, just, and balanced. Mkdwtalk 21:36, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help and approval. I expected the Group of Monuments of Mahabalipuram (16 articles DYK now in the Queue to go on the lead as it is very important architecturally to South India. Can it sill be changed to the lead. The img is really good and but it could be changed to a different img if need be from the article itself. Thanks.--Nvvchar. 08:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you list those concerns at WT:DYK? I have some trouble making that judgement call on my own. —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 08:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to my comments at Template:Did you know nominations/COMINAK, SOMAIR, Akokan, Niger from today.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you have the page on your watchlist, but I believe I have solved the issues you mentioned in the nomination. Cheers, Mentoz86 (talk) 13:50, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't close the nomination. I wasn't the one who created the "wall of text". Japanglish and Penwatchdog raised many issues absolutely unconnected to DYK. Just read the discussion. You may see a hidden agenda in Japanglish's comments. Doing what Japanglish suggested would make the article look better on the outside, but incoherent on the inside. He rewrote the lead section like this. The result was both misleading and unsourced. His latest requests were reasonable and I have basically fulfilled (almost) all of them. I also did it to make the wall of text stop.
If you think the text is too promotional, just list the sentences and I will change them. I am sorry I didn't execute your requests immediately. I was simply waiting for LadyofShalott to do it cause I thought she would do it better. --Moscow Connection (talk) 06:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you again, I think there's a way to improve the hook by changing a couple of words, I posted here: Template:Did you know nominations/Momoiro Clover Z. The change is minor but the new version sounds much better to me. Moscow Connection (talk) 20:09, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Amberrock, thank you for your tireless DYK work, especially in resolving the more difficult nominations and clearing the backlog. PumpkinSky talk 12:23, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• The requested page number is right there in my response to Tito Dutta, 18 April: "the evidence is on p. 225, note 23". Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:05, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They are always marked at the margin and all my articles were written in that way. I reworked these articles several times (for more clarity) and not only on en-wiki, but perhaps this detail should be added to all articles with Pericopa Adultera. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 11:45, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What margin? I've looked at those pages for several minutes, but I was not able to identify any obelus. I still don't see the refernce to the Pericopa Adultera either.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 11:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here (922): Eheb obelisirt ("Eheb" abbr. from "Ehebrecherin"). The same we can find in book of Scrivener, but Scrivener used another numbering of manuscripts. These books are written in an abbreviated style. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 12:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Amberrock, if you any spare time lately, would you have a chance to help with me Template:Did you know nominations/Brad Zellar? Cheers, Mkdw^talk 21:28, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on your talk page. —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 21:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anything I can do to address further concerns you may have? Mkdw^talk 08:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article And Now His Watch Is Ended, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Game of Thrones episode "And Now His Watch Is Ended" introduced the fictional tongue of High Valyrian on television, which was created by a linguist? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/And Now His Watch Is Ended. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amberrock,

Quick question for you regarding Template:Did you know nominations/Seattle riot of 1886. Could you point out to me which policy forbids an article that was a DYK when it was first created from being featured as a DYK again after a 5x expansion? I looked through WP:DYK and it says that articles featured in In The News are ineligible but I couldn't find anything about previous DYKs.

Thank you, GabrielF (talk) 17:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on your talk page.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 17:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification. I did not realize that that rule existed. GabrielF (talk) 17:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently received a message from DYKHousekeepingBot about an incomplete submission for my DYK nomination of my "Forensic developmental psychology" article. However, the page that the DYKHousekeepingBot is referring to is the incorrect submission page for Forensic developmental psychology. When I first created the template for the nomination page, the link to forensic developmental psychology said that the article "Forensic Developmental Psychology" did not exist. I think that was because I capitalized the D and P in developmental and psychology. I created another subnomination page with a link to "Forensic developmental psychology" (lowercase d and p), and this link seemed to work, so I posted the nomination using this subpage. Is there a way to delete the other template? I would still like the article to be considered for DYK.

Here is the link for the INCORRECT dyk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Forensic_Developmental_Psychology

Jyi2 (talk) 17:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on your talk page.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 17:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This does not appear to be true, based on the article, and the reference in the article. Can you verify it, or explain why you approved the hook? Until it can be verified, I've removed it from the DYK hook. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good call on your end. The hook - as it stands - is indeed incorrect. I must have misread that hook, reading it as "beating" Justin Bieber rather than "featuring." Perhaps you should reopen the page to make sure a new hook can be chosen.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 06:26, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've already found a different solution which decreases the bureaucracy load on the DYK reviewers. Excellent. Never mind my suggestion to reopen the discussion. Let's just keep the (edited) hook in play, then.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 06:56, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the reply. --Floquenbeam (talk) 12:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you have a lot at Template:Did you know nominations/James Chadwick? It should be straightforward but I've run into a wall. Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From Amber with love.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 06:46, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've just discovered that, while Team Syachihoko is "the youngest sister" (末っ子 "the youngest child", 3姉妹の末っ子 "the youngest child of 3 sisters"), its average age is bigger that Shiritsu Ebisu Chugaku's. (I suddenly had doubts and I decided to calculate. The result was 5599 days for Team Syachihoko and 5556 for Shiritsu Ebisu Chugaku.) The "youngest sister" means that it was born (formed) last.

I think we shoud call it "the youngest sister" of the three in the hook. Like this:

... that Team Syachihoko is a sister group of Momoiro Clover Z and Shiritsu Ebisu Chugaku and, having been formed in 2011, is the "youngest sister" of the three?

I would edit the preparation area myself, but I think it is better done by an admin. The preparation area is here: Template:Did you know/Preparation area 2. --Moscow Connection (talk) 20:27, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While I think it's admirable you went out and calculated things for yourself, the sources I put through Google Translate all seemed to indicate Team was the youngest of them all. Those news articles are sources for Wikipedia; your calculator is not.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 20:31, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the sources don't say simply "the youngest group" ("最年少グループ"), they say "the youngest child" (Wiktionary: 末っ子). "ももクロ3姉妹の「末っ子」" means "the 'youngest child' of the 3 Momoclo sisters". And they also put the expression "youngest sister" in quotation marks. What they mean by "youngest sister" is that it was "born" last. But the hook will be understood differently, that's the problem. Oricon says more clearly: "ももクロ3姉妹の「末っ子」グループとして昨年結成されたチームしゃちほこ" ("Team Syachihoko, formed last year as the 'youngest child' group of the 3 Momoclo sisters.") That's exacly what my new version of the hook would mean. --Moscow Connection (talk) 20:53, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I will not try to outsmart you (or anybody else) on Japanese source texts. I've changed the hook.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 21:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank very much! I've just changed the article to say the same thing as the hook: [1]. I also posted here: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan#Help with DYK for Team Syachihoko (urgent) earlier, so if anyone from WikiProject Japan thinks I'm mistaken, they still have around 10 hours 33 minutes to comment here. :) --Moscow Connection (talk) 21:27, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please revisit {{Did you know nominations/Public Vault at the Congressional Cemetery}} — this is a new article, not an expansion. Nyttend (talk) 01:22, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The stats, according to mathematical standards, do not meet criteria. If you deduct the stats from the day before the DYK day, that would be (9,789 + 4,708) - 14,690 - the day after the 8th hour = Below 5,000. --George Ho (talk) 07:27, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 May 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article De puinhopen van acht jaar Paars, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that aspiring politician Pim Fortuyn wrote De puinhopen van acht jaar Paars because he believed journalists were "too lazy" to read his previous work? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/De puinhopen van acht jaar Paars. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your DYK review of Last Tango in Halifax. Nice to know it hasn't been forgotten! I have replied here.Eshlare (talk) 19:19, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. No big deal! —♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 21:43, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. I've responded on the nomination page. LDS _{contact me} 05:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've resolved the problems you pointed out. Please visit the page again. Thank you. LDS _{contact me} 14:26, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I wrote an article on this topic that has some importance in that it was the first commercial canal in Scotland. Not being a populat topic I tried to self nominate bit couldn't follow the instructions. Could you help or even do it for me if you think it's worthy? Thanks Rosser Gruffydd 10:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Apparently, you had already created the nomination, but failed to submit it to the nomination page. I've cleaned up both the article and the nomination and listed it correctly at the nomination page. It's fine now; within a few days a reviewer should come along and pass judgement on your article.—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 10:53, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's very kind of you Amber.Rosser Gruffydd 11:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

That's how I roll, baby!—♦♦ AMBER^(ЯʘCK) 11:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See my response. Thanks for the review! A thrush (talk) 19:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How's it now? A thrush (talk) 13:31, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just under 2 weeks ago you left a comment on the Krake DYK Nomination page. I have left a reply on the nomination page. Also, sorry for the delay in a response as I have been on a wikibreak ever since.--Dom497 (talk) 03:18, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

have a look at Template:Did you know nominations/Melvin Bliss/Synthetic Substitution? I don't want it to go off. Thank you.--Launchballer 21:45, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wesley Mouse. Your recent edit to the page Eurovision Song Contest 2013 appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wesley♦Mouse 16:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Here is the results from the official website. The EBU have enlisted Belgium finishing in 5th place and The Netherlands in 6th place - despite them having the same points. We need to stick to what the sources are reporting. Wesley♦Mouse 16:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.