Welcome!
Hello, Amaya Sakura, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!
Aboutmovies (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This is where you would request a re-assessment from that project. In the future, usually the template on the talk page for that project will have links to their assessment page (or at least to the project itself) where you can find where you can ask for a re-assessment. I added a request for you for the article. If you are interested in that topic area, feel free to join that WikiProject as they can help you improve the article. Aboutmovies (talk) 09:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! I noticed your work on the Yuki Kure article and I think I can lend a hand. It looks like this mangaka has some stuff on her that could bring the article's assessment a bit higher. Think I could lend a hand? ~Itzjustdrama C ? 15:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh yes! Please do so! I have a problem getting information that can help but I don't really know where to get them. I must thank you for offering to help doing this article. It was especially hard work trying to translate Japanese to English since I am not formally educated in that language. Oh yes, it was all thanks to User:Samantha_Lim88. Amaya Sakura (talk) 03:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
To pass B1, all the references need to have the |publisher= filled in. The headings of references should follow WP:MOS-AM guidelines. ie. instead of "ZERO - Links", try "Zero - Links".
Btw, geocities sites are not reliable and cannot be used as a source.
B5 just need more expansive coverage of the mangaka. Extremepro (talk) 08:08, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- >> Btw, geocities sites are not reliable and cannot be used as a source.
This was her old website before the current one though. Thanks for the advice. Amaya Sakura (talk) 09:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How can I have
|publisher= filled in? Some info comes from her official blog and pages while some are from a database like this Comic Holmes, then should I fill it with the website's title??
- In the citation, add
|publisher= (whoever owns the website or the beginning of the website (like Mania.com)) If the website is attributed to a company then use the company as the publisher. Extremepro (talk) 10:06, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What about blogs that the mangaka uses? For example, Hiro Fujiwara owns a blog in Jugem.co.jp, so who should I put as publisher? Because Jugem.co.jp hosts the blog but Hiro Fujiwara owns it... Amaya Sakura (talk) 13:34, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What is needed is:
- reception and/or cultural impact section with independent reliable sources
- condense the short sub-sections or expand them.
- expand the lead to give an overview of the article.
look at Popotan, Air (visual novel) and Clannad (visual novel) as those are the best examples for games of a similar genre.陣内Jinnai 03:14, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
Just to point out that the Other_XXX parameters are now deprecated. You can find the discussion here. --KrebMarkt 18:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
Clamp in Wonderland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be
deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clamp in Wonderland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Boleyn (talk) 14:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
