I would like to invite you to join the Article Rescue Squadron. Although Rescue Squadron members do not share any official position on notability, and are simply focused on rescuing articles for deletion, you may find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.
I know that you are a very respectable person wikipedian, but I really do think that we need that extra section on the Main Plot. I don't agree with you that less is better but I understand your thinking. For example, look at the Adventure Quest page. Even though i didn't play aq i was intrested in their detailed storyline. Just giving you an explation for why i undid your edit. --May your keyboards stay sharp fellow wikipedians :3 User:Jakcer (talk) 06:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AQ and AQW can't be compared, though. AQ has a long, extensive, complicated story. AQW doesn't have any story at all, so far. So there's no need to have that extra section. That actually keeps being the problem in the MQ article- we keep updating the plot, and pretty soon the section just becomes overwhelming. So I'm not going to revert your edits, but I just wanted to explain why putting more story in the AQW article is not a good idea. At some point, when AQW has just as long and complicated of a story as AQ, we can have a long plot section again. --Alinnisawest,Dalek Empress (extermination requests here) 14:05, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I will try to keep the plot short and simple. Just to tell you, I think that they are working a lot on the plot for AQW so get ready to edit. --May your keyboards stay sharp fellow wikipedians :3 User:Jakcer (talk) 05:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. :)
Hey there, great userpage, sure brought me back to a more simpler time in gaming. Do you write IF? I wrote one a long time ago using Inform but it really sucked. Anyways, have a great day. OlEnglish(Talk)06:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey I noticed you applied an A1 no context tag to this page. It doesn't meet that criterion, nor any of the speedy deletion criteria, so I have removed the tag. If you sitll believe it should be deleted feel free to AfD it, however I believe it is worthy of an article.--Pattont/c15:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey dude, before you start giving hints and "strong suggestions" regarding vandalism, You should pretty much make sure you've got the right person in the first place. You left me this message on my talk page (I'm not reproducing the image and all the formatting like bold text and all that):
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to AdventureQuest Worlds. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Alinnisawest,Dalek Empress (extermination requests here) 21:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
Just so you know:
I reverted vandalism, which means I actually made this place better, not worse;
There was vandalism afterwards, and you reverted the version back to my version, which means it was pretty much okay, don't you think?
I am very much irritated by your improper and unjustified accusations right now, and I feel as though you should either practise your stuff a bit (like shooting the right duck for instance), or simply let others (say, more accurate shooters) do it instead of you.
Before you start wildly throwing accusations about, consider the situation a bit more carefully. Because I reverted back to your revision, I obviously didn't have a problem with yours. Which would lead one to the conclusion that, oh, maybe there's a slight chance that because your username and the vandal's usernames were right next to each other on the history, I accidentally went to your talk page instead of the vandals?
It might interest you to know that this was, in fact, the case. If you didn't vandalise something and the history of a page implies no one thought you did, then before jumping to conclusions about someone's incapability to use technology, you should probably consider alternatives. No need to insult others' intelligence. Oh, and you do realize you can remove messages from your talk page, don't you? --Alinnisawest,Dalek Empress (extermination requests here) 01:05, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sars. And now it's on your talk page, uglying it up. Hate to butt in, but perhaps you should delete this section later too. You know, after you're done with it.
On another note, the AQW has been bomboarded with vandalism recently... hmm...
Meh, I won't do anything with this section until the next time I archive this page... which, considering the rate at which I use it, will probably be next year! But it's fine, I don't mind people seeing it. I made a mistake, and I'm not going to hide it. And about AQW, you think we need to apply for page protection? I've been noticing a lot of vandalism myself... --Alinnisawest,Dalek Empress (extermination requests here) 12:40, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I just wanted to list who is in the army of each Lord of Chaos. Rtkat3 (talk) 7:42, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
If you want to include the minions like Slugfit, then yes. I just discovered that Escherion wanted the Runix Cube so that Drakath can awaken the Lake Hydra: the first of the Chaos Beasts. Rtkat3 (talk) 10:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Alinnisawest, HappyInGeneral (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Orphaned non-free media (File:RobinaHood.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:RobinaHood.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 06:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've started a discussion to address the redirects associated with Titin. Since you edited one or other of the redirects at some point, or discussed it on one of the talk pages, I wanted to notify you of the redirect discussion. Carcharoth (talk) 11:54, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
Hello Alinnisawest! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
){kind=link}
