User talk:Alexsanderson83/Archive 6

AfD nomination of Ireland national schoolboy rugby union team

I have nominated Ireland national schoolboy rugby union team, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ireland national schoolboy rugby union team. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2007 UEFA Champions League Final

I note you have added an image to this article to "identify the match", I am unsure where the confusion arises, what other match does it get confused with if the non-free image is not included? I was under the impression that there was only one match called the "UEFA Champions League Final" in 2007 Fasach Nua (talk) 18:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and his opinion is....? Fasach Nua (talk) 18:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is unfortunate that you wont give your opinion, other than it is the same as PJs, and I dont know what PJs is, it makes a dialogue difficult. Fasach Nua (talk) 18:41, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CapitalR's RfA

Hi Alexsanderson83. I just looked at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/CapitalR#Oppose and saw that your oppose ended up inside the discussion box about Kurt Weber. I think it was meant to be outside the box and thus an oppose against CapitalR becoming admin, right? But since you placed it inside that box it can be interpreted as an oppose against Kurt Weber's point of views. I thought I'd better ask you here before I move your oppose out of that box.

(And I don't like such boxes. They mess things up.)

--David Göthberg (talk) 09:41, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of edit to Ashley Ward

Could you explain why you reverted my edit to the article Ashley Ward. I removed a 'Personal Life' section, as it appeared to be unencyclopedic and included unnecessary personal details and trivia (unrelated to the reason for his inclusion in Wikipedia). I'd appreciate a response: if you thought my edit was vandalism, I can assure you that it wasn't, and perhaps you can restore my edit. -- MightyWarrior (talk) 22:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just because something has been mentioned in a local newspaper doesn't mean that it is encyclopedic and should be included in Wikipedia. This section really has nothing to do with Ashley Ward the footballer: "how he proposed", "the road where they used to live", "local planning application for a second driveway". It also mentions his children's names which I think may be an infringement of WP:BLP. If you still disagree with me, could we take this to a third opinion? -- MightyWarrior (talk) 22:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for uploading Image:Robbie NEC.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Kelly

There are at least two, as shown at Gary Kelly. Superm401 - Talk 21:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I said there were at least two, and in my opinion a disambig is justified. It makes more sense than having Gary Kelly go directly to either. Superm401 - Talk 22:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]