User talk:Alexisfan07

Closing Credits

Hey there

Why do you insist on using the closing credits as a source? I haven't heard from ABC's Soaps in Depth or any of the huge magazines that Eddie Alderson went to recurring? On November 23 if were gonna go by the credits, listed Eddie as recurring? Maybe the credits were wrong to begin with? He's still in the opening? Look I think you need to have a reliable source saying Eddie went to recurring, The credits could be wrong for all you know. I'm just warning you. By the way I cleaned out your talk page for ya, it was getting a little long and you had all those orphaned images on there. Soapfan2013 (talk) 17:39, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LOL yeah I don't understand image credits at all so I just left it there. Anyway, the closing credits are the official credits of the show. It's just how it is. No, they're not 100% accurate but what is? SOD and SOW have missed many recurring drops before. I would think they may just not have known. It's just not really newsworthy. I don't think he was purposefully dropped, his contract probably just expired and it made no sense to renew it for months when he was not going to have story until the end of the show. But regardless, he is on recurring, no matter what the reason behind it. I'm not trying to be mean, I just feel like people are trying to keep him in the contract section cause they're like upset he got "bumped" or something. I'm the biggest Matthew fan out there and I'm not upset lol. I just want to keep the page accurate for everyone, I'm not trying to be vindictive. The closing credits have NEVER been wrong when it comes to contract vs. recurring, not once. Spelling sometimes but not what TYPE of contract the people have. I knew Deanna was gone by watching the closing credits weeks before it was announced. As for the opening...it simply isn't accurate. If you want me to go on a tirade about the opening I can but I'd rather not haha. Alexisfan07 2 December 2011

I'm not trying to be mean either, but maybe you are right, but yeah go on the tirade about the opening, I already know what you are gonna say, that Dorian and Langston are still in the opening, Lindsay was in the opening for years after she was recurring for 5 years. I just want you to know, that if Eddie is listed in the contract section this week, I'm going to put him in the contract section. I'm not upset that Matthew is on recurring. If you wanna keep it accurate, go for it. But giving that he's gonna be a father, kind of like a contract storyline right there. Soapfan2013 (talk) 03:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't blame you at all, there was someone else that was trying to claim Eddie was on contract but they were MUCH ruder about it so I appreciate your approach. :) I don't want to be right in this case per se but I've been watching for years and the credits don't mess up that kinda stuff. I hope you aren't offended haha. I agree the storyline is big but many recurring stars get big stories (Echo had one for like a year, though now she's disappeared haha). Alexisfan07 2 December 2011

Maybe Echo might show up again before the finale in January? And yeah I think I know who you are talking about. Soapfan2013 (talk) 08:13, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She hasn't been in any filming reports so I think she's just gone with no real closure. I'm glad they realized fans would rather see Roxy this late in the game. Alexisfan07 4 December 2011
Kim Zimmer is still with the show. She hasn't left. Just a shortage of storyline for Echo. Musicfreak7676 (talk) 17:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't bother me to keep her in the recurring cast but I'm telling you, we've seen the last of her. Sorry. Alexisfan07 4 December 2011
I don't. Because right now, yes they're focusing on the more contracted characters for the series finale, but she'll pop up. Kim has shown no signs on no longer being on OLTL. BTW, I am currently trying to get you back your old "talks" that were removed by someone that was not you. Musicfreak7676 (talk) 17:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Musicfreak, I did that, I removed them, her talk page was getting too long anywayz, no need to bring them back, I already told her I did it just to clean up her talk page. Soapfan2013 (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can't go deleting someone else's talk page, it's incredibly rude and not your decision to make such decisions. I will bring it back in an archive, which is what SHOULD have been done by Alexisfan07, NOT you! Musicfreak7676 (talk) 17:42, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was helping her out Musicfreak, who died and made you king of Wikipedia? I already told her I deleted the crap on her talk page so she can have more convos she seemed ok with that, quit bossing other people around and mind your own business. In fact why the heck are we having this convo on her talk page? Soapfan2013 (talk) 20:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Inviting You into Discussions

I'm inviting you into these discussions: [1] [2]. Figured you'd like to be included, as a big contributor to the soaps. Musicfreak7676 (talk) 18:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Todd Manning#New Image

Alexisfan07, will you try to make a persuasive argument for the new image on the talk page? Simply uploading the new image that has been rejected quite a few times is not going to solve anything. All that results in is WP:Edit warring, which is against policy. On topics such as disputed images, Wikipedia works by achieving WP:Consensus. Flyer22 (talk) 02:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 18:34, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cole Thornhart

Should I upload a pic of Van Hughes as Cole Thornhart, since he is playing the role of Cole now? Soapfan2013 (talk) 21:35, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there :) First of all, thanks for backing me on Terri Conn. It's absurd how little people understand about how contracts work. She's part of the final cast, she should remain listed. Yeah I'd love to see a pic of Van up there but I'd put it under the box (like how Trevor's is under the info box for Todd). Brandon should remain the main picture since he held the years for four years. I just don't know the exact code to put his pic there. Alexisfan07 4 January 2012

I need to download the episode first than get a screenshot, funny enough I agree that Van's pic should be on the bottom since he's playing the part for 2 weeks so. Soapfan2013 (talk) 09:02, 4 January 2012 (UTC) I just uploaded a pic of Van as Cole and it's at the bottom. Check it out in the Cole Thornhart article. I hope you like the pic, tell me what you think of the pic. Soapfan2013 (talk) 17:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I really don't like the pic I posted of Van as Cole so I'm gonna replace it with another one when I get the screenshot. Because that one is too dark. Soapfan2013 (talk) 20:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Haha I noticed it was kind of dark but I didn't wanna intrude. It's your call. :) Alexisfan07 (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hope the new pic is better, lemme know what you think? Soapfan2013 (talk) 20:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That works but is there a shot of him where he's sort of smiling or something at Starr? I think that would work best. Maybe from that scene with them in the cabana? I can't really remember every single scene of them to think of a good shot though. Alexisfan07 (talk) 23:01, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The first one is of him in the cabana and that was dark. This is the best one I can come up with where you could see his face. I'm sorry. I think the new one looks better than the last one. Soapfan2013 (talk) 04:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's totally fine! I think it works :) Alexisfan07 (talk) 13:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Just to let you know, I reverted your addition to List of Days of our Lives cast members because social networking sites, blogs, etc. are not acceptable sources for information per WP:V. If you can find a reliable, 3rd party source to back up the information, you may return it. Thanks. Rm994 (talk) 16:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not continue to use social networking sites, i.e. facebook as sources. They are not reliable per WP:V. Failure to follow rules could result in your being blocked from editing. Rm994 (talk) 05:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis why do you keep posting from twitter as sources, soapcentral and twitter are not allowed as sources. I don't want you to be blocked from editing, find another source other than twitter or soapcentral. :) Soapfan2013 (talk) 16:32, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Once again reminding you that Twitter cannot be used as a source, whether it's from an actor or not. Whether it's an airdate, etc. it cannot be used. It fails WP:V. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 22:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited There's Something About a War, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julie Mayer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ringer, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Carver is NOT a regular!!

Charlie Carver is NOT a regular on Desperate Housewives. He was, once, but not anymore! AdamDeanHall (talk) 14:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me you're kidding. Or are you blind? He was listed after Kathryn Joosten in the "Also STARRING" credits. I don't know if you personally don't want him to be but he's just as much a regular as the other people in that category. Alexisfan07 7 March 2012

File source problem with File:ToddManningPromo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:ToddManningPromo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. We hope (talk) 15:12, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:ToddManningPromo.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ToddManningPromo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. We hope (talk) 15:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC) We hope (talk) 15:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why?

Why do you keep using Twitter as a source when we've told you it is NOT. STOP. Use it again, I will report you to a hire authority. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 16:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was the easiest way to show everyone that he was essentially off the show. Honestly, I would've removed him from the list completely since that's what SOD says but since he himself said it's possible he's recurring, I figured I'd paste it for everyone to see and leave him there to keep the fanatics like you happy. Alexisfan07 27 May 2012
Still we've told you over and over you CANNOT use it. I don't know how that doesn't transmute into your mind. And please sign your posts correctly. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 23:39, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you continue to ignore the Twitter rule? MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, I'm not. Did I use it to source the page? NO. But to act like Twitter doesn't exist and that's not his official page is preposterous. I'm simply choosing not to use that SOD quote. That's the only source that's ever said he was out. He's not out, they misunderstood and the actor cleared up that he's simply out as in off contract. This isn't hard so please don't make it hard. Leave him in the contract credits and I will move him recurring when it's reflected in the show's credits, okay? Alexisfan07 23 June 2012
No Alexis, they did not misunderstanding. Twitter fails per WP:TWITTER and has been claimed as not valid for sourcing information on soap lists. You know better, you've been told better. SOD does not get it "wrong", they get their information direct from the soaps and their distribution companies. He's OUT. The magazine states he's out of the show, they didn't cite it as a contract/status change, they put it under "Going". MusicFreak7676 TALK! 20:32, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. We do not remove people from cast lists. You know better than that. And SC/SON is not a valid source per WP:V on cast lists per WP:SOAPS. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 15:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. You know the rules Alexis, you've known them for years. This is your final warning from me before I go to the Admin's board. MusicFreak7676 TALK! 18:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure if you're sourcing, you fully source it. Do not be lazy and just wrap a ref code around it. All others are properly sourced, please keep it uniform. Musicfreak7676 my talk page! 22:36, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Reeves/Steve Webber

Hi, just a reminder, I noticed you took Reeves/Webber out of the Main Cast and Departing on the GH cast members page. That's great, but when you do that can you also please remember to put the person down into the Former Cast Members at the same time? It's happened before (I'm not saying by you), and it would be helpful. Thanks! Inhan Lagur (talk) 23:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! I always forget. I will add him next time. --Alexisfan07 (talk) 00:31, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maks & Richard Simmons

Hi, I don't mean to be that guy again, but when you delete entire lines and footnotes from Debuting and Returning (such as you did with Maks & Richard Simmons), can you please remember to move them to their proper place elsewhere, whether it be Main, Recurring, Former, or Notable? (In these cases, Notable) I know it's exciting to change a page, but can you do the second half of it too? This way others don't have to look to make sure it got done. Thank you.... Inhan Lagur (talk) 21:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:OLTL2008logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:OLTL2008logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Closing credits

We have told you numerous times to quit relying on closing credits as sources, they are not reliable, but yet you do not listen. Closing Credits are not a reliable source, you need to find a reliable source. P.J. (talk) 04:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You should know better than to delete characters off of a cast list, and you cannot just remove without a source providing that said character and/or actress is off the cast. Please stop with this edits. It's beginning to be seen as vandalism. You should know better Alexisfan! livelikemusic my talk page! 18:05, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this your official last warning about deleting cast members off of cast lists. It's showing signs of severe vandalism to the cast list article. You should only require one warning, not multiple for the same issue. livelikemusic my talk page! 23:42, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of General Hospital cast members, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic my talk page! 04:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. livelikemusic my talk page! 22:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in List of General Hospital cast members, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. livelikemusic my talk page! 14:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of General Hospital cast members may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and Goings |title=[[Soap Opera Digest]] |page=11 |date=February 17, 2014 |publisher=Vol. 39, No. 7)}}</ref>
  • | Sarah Johnson || [Children of General Hospital#Josslyn Jacks|[[Josslyn Jacks]] || 2012–13

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of General Hospital cast members may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Ins&Outs |title=[[ABC Soaps In Depth]] |page=12 |date=March 31, 2014 |publisher=Vol. 18, No. 13)}}</ref>
  • | Sarah Johnson || [Children of General Hospital#Josslyn Jacks|[[Josslyn Jacks]] || 2012–13

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:31, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Following??1/

Yo diggity! Generally, the "special" designation applied by the programming company doesn't apply here, see the list here for comparison and how it doesn't denote it. If you feel the need to mention their particular notability with regards to the show and their involvement, feel free to write up something similar to the cast list section for this article, admittedly I haven't watched The Following because televisions don't smell very good

cheers ~Helicopter Llama~ 00:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Stop removing "Debuting", "Returning", etc. from the list. Hide them instead. You keep removing them, they should remain hidden to make it easier to add cast changes. livelikemusic my talk page! 23:03, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Can you please stop adding bare URLS and full cite your sources on articles related to General Hospital, etc. livelikemusic my talk page! 01:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at General Hospital cast members, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. livelikemusic my talk page! 16:58, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chrysteesimone.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chrysteesimone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lenasimone.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lenasimone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Donnchad.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Donnchad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Passionsesme.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Passionsesme.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:57, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alexisfan07. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Passionsivy.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Passionsivy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]