User talk:Alexf/Archive 69
May need to revoke TPAA user you blocked (The Unusual Henytan) has continued to post promotional content on their talk page, so it may be necessary to revoke talk page access. It seems to be a clear promotion-only account. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC) Nice blockThanks for blocking Ali hussan2006. He was becoming an annoyance. SniperReverter (Talk to me) 16:29, 3 January 2023 (UTC) Deleted page under G11Hey there, fairly new to wiki editing so was likely correctly moderated (apologies) but having read through the CSD had enough trepidation/uncertainty to raise the issue. Please find the Redlink to aformentioned page attached. This page related to the Reality Engine, the video game engine powering Roblox - 58.8 million daily active users as of Q3 2022 so certainly meets notability requirement; on notability I'd also point to Unity and Unreal Engine which both hold pages on this site. Would really appreciate some extended feedback, does a page require extensive contents to be approved, was it correctly moderated under the wrong rule etc. Thank you, JedDevs (talk) 00:35, 5 January 2023 (UTC)JedDevs
Administrators' newsletter – January 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Help with checking a translationHello Alexf, I am looking for a native Spanish speaker to help check a translation and your name was very early on in the WP:BABEL Spanish group. Warning, the topic I am asking you to check is on sexual assault and rape and is graphic. If you are not comfortable with this topic, please reject me. If you are willing and able to help, can you check if the text I have added here matches this source here? Thank you. starship.paint (exalt) 03:19, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
AganaNsiireHi, In 2018, you indefinitely blocked AganaNsiire (talk · contribs). You said that it's for "spam". I guess it's because of this edit, which you reverted. It's not spam, but a legitimate news website, to which there are links from many Wikipedia article. The target of that link is here now; I wouldn't add it to the article myself, because it's just an opinion article on a news website, and there are more valuable sources about that topic, but it's definitely not outright spam. If you thought that it's spam because the article is written by the same user, then as far as I know, it's not against policy by itself, and not a reason to block indefinitely without warning. Would you agree to unblock that account? I have reasons that he can make positive contributions to Wikipedia, and I can vouch for him. Thanks! Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:41, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
What just happenedWell… Something just happened to my account in chinese wikipedia, I just got blocked, but i’m only making a article about 23002 Jillhirsch. When I was going to submit it, The system just said that I got blocked beacause of: Destroying articles. And sorry I’m kinda bad of english… but I’m not even doing that, I’m just making the article normally… SussybakaWeiji (talk) 19:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Hi, I've noticed that you hid a revision on that page per RD2. It happens that the revision prior to it and the one after it (yes, my revision) also includes RD2-able content, as it seems like a different IP vandalized back in September - and it was not corrected until a third IP removed it. Best regards, LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 11:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC) Monterey, CaliforniaHi Alexf, I just stumbled upon [2] via AIV and wondered about the criterion used. I apply RD3 pretty liberally, but it seems to exclude spam links, so I somehow felt that exclusion might apply to the other RDs as well. Is there a past discussion or guidance about this somewhere? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
Blocked user returns to vandalismHello. A user you blocked, User:108.49.199.118 , vandalized Sia today. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC) Administrators' newsletter – March 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Speedy deletion contested: The Voice Generations PhilippinesHello Alexf. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of The Voice Generations Philippines, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 is not applicable for TV. Thank you. BangJan1999 21:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC) Sock accountHi there - you recently blocked TheOnlineMillionaire. They admitted (pre-block) to being the same person that operates the account Emillion79, and said they would only use the TheOnlineMillionaire account. Should the Emillion79 account be blocked outright, or only if they use it to evade the block of TheOnlineMillionaire? --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Speedy deletion declined: User:Abdiasiis haji/sandboxHello Alexf. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Abdiasiis haji/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC) Administrators' newsletter – May 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk (talk) 07:53, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Delete User:FeesasTime0Hello @Alexf. Thanks for blocking the above user, can you please delete their user page too? - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 21:30, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Salebot10Suggest you revoke talk page access following your block of Salebot10 (talk · contribs). Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 12:14, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
VRT, lost password & blockticket:2023051710014919 could do with your attention please. Cabayi (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
User Talk IPsI know you just left them a note instead of blocking them, and I assumed that was that for my AIV report so I removed it, but are you sure they're not the same person? (maybe I'm assuming you saw my report, and you didn't actually see it). Summary: 1 to 2 hours ago the active IP doing this talk page stuff was 203.180.194.248. For ease of investigation:
– 2804:F14:80B6:3101:94AC:3D6C:795E:EF8A (talk) 01:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Administrators' newsletter – July 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. A cookie for you!
The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Administrators' newsletter – August 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023). Interface administrator changes
Junicode editHi Alexf, I do not understand the message you left me to the effect that you have removed an inappropriate link. First of all, you don't seem to have removed it. If you do remove it, what will be the result? Will you restore the statement that the latest version of this font is 1.002, which has been inaccurate for nearly two years? The note on that statement linked to a place where one could download an obsolete version. Do you mean to restore that link? It has been a frustration to me for (as I said) nearly two years that the Wikipedia entry for my font linked to an obsolete version. I was uncomfortable about correcting it myself, but I thought it less ethical to get someone to do it for me, or to do it anonymously, so after thinking about it for a long time I did it propria persona. When the message about conflicts of interest popped up, I read it. There was a great deal of talk there about trying to use Wikipedia to make a profit, which would obviously be unethical, but since Junicode is an Open Source project from which I have never made any money (well, someone many years ago left a $25 donation on the SourceForge site, but you know what I mean), and never expect to make any, I decided it was all right to update the entry. I apologize if I was mistaken. But I would ask: what are you going to do? Restore the inaccurate information? Delete the whole entry (though Junicode is considered an important Open Source project)? Or simply remove the link so that your readers will be unable to find the resource the article is about? I'll be interested to see what you decide. Best wishes, Peter Psb1558 (talk) 23:09, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Assistance RequestHello, I've been addressing fostered content issues on Wikipedia over the past month and there are now four remaining in usertalk space. One of these is on your User talk:Alexf/Archive 4. If you would be willing, would you replace the entire contents of the "Doczilla's RFA" section with the following code block to correct the syntax issues (one fostered content error, a table tag issue, two obsolete tags, three missing end tags, and three stripped tags)? While I'd normally make a smaller change X to Y in this sort of situation, this particular section had layered issues and it is just easier to fix the whole thing in one go.
Thank you, and if you have any questions, let me know. Zinnober9 (talk) 15:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
Moverspackersdirectories (talk · contribs) Can you revert this user's page and revoke their talkpage access. I tried to post it to AIV, but the bot removed it because it thought that it was a comment underneath a different report. Thanks! 2601:1C0:4401:F60:6C1F:6C04:BDED:7E5B (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2023 (UTC) Also, while I've got your attention, could you rev-del this as well. A very serious BLP violation. Thanks! 2601:1C0:4401:F60:6C1F:6C04:BDED:7E5B (talk) 18:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC) QuestionHi, I've noticed on a few accounts where I've reverted spam and you've rev/del'ed some of them. Is this something I should be asking for when I revert? Or do you have a magic wand that conjures them up in a back room somewhere waiting to be banished into the ether? Just because I'm nosey. Thanks, Knitsey (talk) 11:05, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
Erroneous blockI believe you may have blocked Thambidhuraitd (talk) in error. The reason cited is username policy. "Thambidhurai" appears to be an actual Indian last name, you may have misread last three letters as "Ltd" and mistook it for a company name. I have no connection to this user; only watching them due to two attempts at unsourced DoB change on a BLP − I reverted the first one. I also haven't seen any edits of a promotional nature from them, unless there's something that's been deleted and not visible to me. Cheers, 2406:3003:2077:1E60:CEFF:5CDD:BBC4:2876 (talk) 04:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
QueryHello, Alexf, I noticed you blocked Nið ricsað and deleted several of their articles as hoaxes. To be honest, I wasn't sure, I don't know much about this subject area. Should their other article creations be deleted and their edits rolled back? Just wondering. Thanks, have a good week. Liz Read! Talk! 15:53, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations openNominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC) User:Afsar80Can you block this spambot? Thanks. 2601:601:51C:6A8:4D49:CA1F:3CB5:D334 (talk) 18:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Previously blocked editor still not complying with site policiesIn May, you blocked User:Lakearea270 after I reported them at WP:COIN for editing Lake Area Technical College. You unblocked them after they changed their name. They haven't edited again until today when they resumed editing the same article. They have already explicitly admitted that they have a paid editing relationship with the college but they haven't complied with any of the relevant policies and practices except the name change that was imposed by your block. I think they may need to be blocked again until they comply with WP:PAID. ElKevbo (talk) 23:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
User:UnivocracyHi!, I don't the block you just levied on the aforementioned user should be a soft block. Edit filters disallowed several very vulgar comments on my talk page after I U5'd their user page. Thanks Seawolf35 (talk) 00:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Spam version-suppressionHi, could you please justify your suppression from public view of a revision to List of breweries in California, Special:Diff/1175548828? On the one hand, I can see the justification for calling it spam and reverting the edit. But the sort of revision deletion that you performed goes well beyond that and typically only happens for copyvio or severe BLP violations. See WP:CRD for a list of valid revision deletion reasons. Which one of those do you think your spam-hiding revdel falls under? —David Eppstein (talk) 21:54, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).
The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. SoftblockHi, Alexf. Was it your intention to merely softblock User:Paloma Sanchez The Art of Jewlery, with the Twinkle notification that tells them "Your username is the principal reason for the block" and explains how to immediately create a new account? They had posted an egregiously promotional userpage, as you know (you deleted it). I normally hardblock such accounts. (In this case it would be really easy for them to create a new account, too - all they'd have to do is correct the misspelling "Jewlery"!) Bishonen | tålk 08:13, 13 October 2023 (UTC).
Talk page accessHi, I forgot to ask at AIV, Can you revoke talk page access as well please. I think we are supposed to ask, sorry about that. Knitsey (talk) 14:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
Blocked user's new accountHi, if there's a more proper channel to do this through, I apologize. A user you recently blocked (Special:Contributions/68.193.160.90) seems to be under a new account (Special:Contributions/Pultzser). They have a similar pattern of edits. If it is the same person, they are probably also Fourlaxers. - Hardkeyyy (talk) 19:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke TPA. Cahk (talk) 08:05, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Second account from blocked userSince you blocked User:09st0n3r45, can you please also block User:GCFG? Appears to be the same person who recreated an account (same vandalism style, same target page). ChaotıċEnby(talk) 18:55, 2 November 2023 (UTC) Restoring Draft:SuperGearsHello, I saw that you deleted the page Draft:SuperGears under CSD G11. Could you please restore it? I'm in the process of improving the article and rewriting it to avoid promotional sounding text. There are third party sources and I expect that the topic will gain even more news sources in the near future. -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 18:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Request for small translationHello, I noticed you have {{User es}} on your user page. Would you mind translating a few of the headers and contents of the table at Gran Premio del Sur? It was mindlessly copied from eswiki, but it shouldn't take that long to fix (for a native Spanish person at least). It should only take a few minutes at most. Thanks, — MATRIX! (a good person!)[citation unneeded] 19:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023). Interface administrator changes
Unblock requestYou have blocked the IP address 71.222.21.17 for "Repeatedly triggering the Edit filter". There is now an unblock request from this IP address at UTRS. I have checked the history, and it is clear that the editor was repeatedly trying to remove material which unambiguously contradicts what the cited source says. Also, as the IP editor correctly pointed out, the citation for the removed material says that the reference refers to Daviess County, Ohio whereas the article is about Daviess County, Indiana. In fact, the page linked by the reference does refer to Daviess County, Indiana, and "Ohio" was evidently either a mistake or vandalism. In any case, I see no reason to think that the IP editor was acting in good faith, and moreover as I have said the information does not agree with the cited source, so I can only see the block as a mistake. I am therefore very much inclined to accept the unblock request, but I am holding back in case you know of some relevant fact which I have missed, and which significantly changes the situation. I will be grateful if you will let me know. JBW (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue 211, November 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. About renameHi. The user who has been blocked by you Koliveira203 renamed. FYI, thanks. Vincent Vega mesaj? 00:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC) Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:14, 19 November 2023 (UTC) Desert HawkMay I ask why you reverted my citations? MrGreen1163 (talk) 01:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Addition of okay(K) to tobi Lou’s Wikipedia pageokay(K) is featured with soundbwoy on the outro of delete my # baby on live on ice. Please add okay(K) back as a contributing artist to the project. The pitchfork article does not reference soundbwoy yet he is added as a contributing artist. I added additional references that shows okay(K) is featured on the project. I added the SoundCloud link to tobi Lou’s official SoundCloud as a reference which shows that he is indeed on the album. here is the link again for reference: https://on.soundcloud.com/vLjm3oRPYq5njCVG6 Okayksux (talk) 20:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Administrators' newsletter – December 2023News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
The Bugle: Issue 212, December 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC) Your administrative actions on Power engineering software and User talk:XGSLabHi Alexf, Just wanted to let you know I neglected to remove the link from the article when I was drive-by tagging, but that's been fixed now. However, there are also many other links to other companies which have also been removed. I noticed you struck the edit that added the link the first time, so you may want to strike my edit afterward as well. However, the cat might be out of the bag for all the other links. I'm not too sure what the rules and procedures are on your end. Thanks, RetroCosmos (talk) 15:36, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
|