|
User talk:Albanian HistorianWelcome
Your submission at Articles for creation: Zhuj Selmani (May 23)
Your draft article, Draft:Zhuj Selmani Hello, Albanian Historian. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Zhuj Selmani". In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 19:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC) AfC notification: Draft:Zhuj Selmani has a new comment Your submission at Articles for creation: Zhuj Selmani has been acceptedThe article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:07, 1 January 2016 (UTC)WP AlbaniaYou may want to check out WikiProject Albania, where you can collaborate with other Wikipedians interested in the subject. MB298 (talk) 23:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC) ImagesHi Albanian Historian.
Great initiative and good job for the new articles.
Go to WP:SQ and see other articles, and related users. It takes patience! --Mondiad (talk) 03:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC) Hey! Thanks for your comment! I am new to Wiki and i will try to improve myself.
Oso KukaGreat work on finding Konica's magazine!
Falminderit shoku! --Albanian Historian (talk) 08:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Albanian Historian Disambiguation link notification for January 9Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC) Uprising of LumaGreat work!
Thanks man! I will try to improve it. --Albanian Historian (talk) 09:03, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Albanian Historian Anti-Slavic sentiment
Wooooow. I just had to make you a fitting quote box. This is real poetry. Did you actually think this one through?--Zoupan 16:50, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. --Zoupan 15:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC) Stop this behaviour.--Zoupan 15:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
New articlesHi, try to create smaller articles and less complicated. Leave the big topics for later...I.e., the articles for Zhuj Selmani was ok. And you need to work it a little, cause automatic translation is not enough. Even if you create them, they will be tagged as "problematic", which makes them of little value. --Mondiad (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of The Expulsion of Albanians
A tag has been placed on The Expulsion of Albanians requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from URL. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zoupan 05:51, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Source misinterpretationHi, I noticed that you added text (link):
The source (link) says:
With this edit you misinterpreted source. Please be so kind to try not to repeat this kind of disruption in future. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2016 (UTC) GusinjeYes, from the word "Guci" or "Puci" meaning "flash" or "flashlight" referring to a strategic position. The source is reliable. If you cannot provide counter-sources, then this discussion is over. Edits are made with sources and proper arguments, not nationalist editing with nothing to back it up with. --Albanian Historian (talk) 17:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Administrators' noticeboard threadThere is a thread regarding you at the Administrators' noticeboard.--Zoupan 18:13, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
BlockedYou have been blocked for one hour for violating WP:NPA. Please use the time to read the following:
KillerChihuahua 18:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation in The Expulsion of AlbaniansHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the page The Expulsion of Albanians, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. larryv (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC) prod tagsIn my opinion, you were well within your rights to remove a prod tag.According to WP:PROD and [[WP:Deletion policy}}, you may remove a tag if you object to deletion ...for any reason. Anyone may still take the article to AfD. I have no opinion on the underlying issue. DGG ( talk ) 15:23, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Ndoc Mark GegaShiko ta permirsosh pak Ndoc Mark Gegan. Duke ndrequr dhe meson. Shiko psh artikullin e Sefe Koshares. Tung.--Mondiad (talk) 03:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC) February 2016 This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Athenean (talk) 22:09, 2 February 2016 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for February 3Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sak Faslia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peja and Rugova. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 3 February 2016 (UTC) Repost of The Battle of Plava and Gusinje
Stefan Dušan
There are references given to it, if you don't like that, bring it up to a discussion board and explain why the references are faulty then... --Albanian Historian (talk) 21:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
I agree. Revert the one i did, i accidentally did it. Zhoupan, after you.--Albanian Historian (talk) 22:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC) February 2016
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr. K. 07:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Discretionary sanctions alert about the BalkansThis message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information: The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Dr. K. 07:48, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Novi Pazar
Do not change the edits without constructive arguments, please. --Albanian Historian (talk) 12:00, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
The quote refers to massacring them! So it is no fraud but since you insist, then i shall add exactly what the quote says. --Albanian Historian (talk) 14:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 10Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2016 (UTC) wp:3rr violationI've noticed you have breached the 3 revert rule in Dardani. I kindly ask you to self-revert and initiate a discussion in the correspondent talkpage. Else you leave me no choice but to report this kind of disruption.Alexikoua (talk) 21:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC) Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Edit warring at Dardani {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Albanian Historian reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: Blocked). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Warning for what? That i add references which indeed are reliable? I'd like a third part to judge this. --Albanian Historian (talk) 09:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)  Albanian Historian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I contribute enough with proper sources and references, i see not why a block would be necessary. Its pointless. I want to know why my references are not reliable, so far you've failed to show me. It is not enough to say "Its an unreliable source". Who is to judge that? And if there is to be a block, i'd like to state my opinion first, with several editors to judge said accusation. My previous warnings has been due to image-related copyright violations to which i've learned and improved. I want this block lifted and i want the editors who state that my edits are violations to prove WHY they are, and not simply state that the references are unreliable. The Dardania, as properly referenced by a third party, is not unreliable. I want an explanation and this block lifted as its not even giving me a chance. THANK YOU. Albanian Historian (talk) 09:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC) Decline reason: You are blocked for edit warring. Whether you're right or not, that's disruptive and not permitted. Huon (talk) 11:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Sockpuppetry
Speedy deletion nomination of Albanias Golgotha 1912Hello Albanian Historian, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Albanias Golgotha 1912 for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included. If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Hama Dryad (talk · contribs · email) 19:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
AppealingAlbanian Historian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I fail to understand why the images i upload are copyrighted when they are not?? The photos are over 70 years old, and many photos loose their copyright? But i guess i must read the rules better, and if so, i apologize for violating the rules. I simply try to improve the quality of the articles i add by adding photos, but since i have difficulties with this, i must improve it then. Could i have a date when the ban might be lifted, if it is lifted? Thank you for your response. It is not my intention to spam, i like to think i make many contributions to Wikipedia, many which often requires hours of translation. I want to continue to contribute to Wikipedia, and i promise i will improve my editing, and read the rules better. Decline reason: You are blocked for the misuse of multiple accounts (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kadribistrica), and an unblock request that does not address that can not be accepted. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. --Albanian Historian (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC) I see. Well, i'd like to apologize for using multiple accounts. It was unintentional, although I did not know it was against the rules until after. I will improve my behaviour and my articles. --Albanian Historian (talk) 17:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
this is the original account. --Albanian Historian (talk) 18:42, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
I'd like to make a new unblock request regarding my use of multiple accounts. --Albanian Historian (talk) 07:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Kadri Bistrica for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kadri Bistrica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kadri Bistrica until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC) Nomination of The Expulsion of Albanians 1877-1878 for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Expulsion of Albanians 1877-1878 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Expulsion of Albanians 1877-1878 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Axiomus (talk) 11:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC) AppealingAlbanian Historian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I want to apologize for violating the rules of Wikipedia. I am guilty of socket-pupping and i regret not reading the rules properly. As i have donated prevously and spent a lot of time here, i wish to be granted another chance. I believe i have much to contribute with and it would be a shame of this was what stopped me. I want to continue to contribute and donate. I've learned this the hard way. I would also like to adress that i've read the rules of copyright violations and will not repeat myself, such as uploading protected material. --Albanian Historian (talk) 12:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC) Decline reason: I'm declining this request for now, but you are given the WP:STANDARDOFFER. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 17:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! Hello, Albanian Historian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
