|
User talk:Alaexis/archive5
ArbCom 2018 election voter message Hello, Alaexis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Alaexis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 19Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hezbollah armed strength, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IDF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC) About Lead ArticleHi @Alaexis: User Tubslubeamorepersempre and Gridlust had added lot of information in the lead section of the articles West Bengal, Bengal and Bangladesh. I am not sure how far those information's are accurate/correct, although they have provided source, nevertheless I still think the lead hasn't been properly written as per Wikipedia standard. I am new to Wikipedia so, don't have the expertise of writing an important articles like these. Please help make necessary changes as per your knowledge and expertise. The lead of all three articles must be rewritten, its reading more like advertisement of the article. They have simply copy paste information's in the lead just check all three leads and you will get the information. Thank You--Aakanksha55 (talk) 06:50, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
(UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Cabayi (talk) 15:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC) Ostoja DanielewiczHi! Thnx for the correction, much appreciated! Regarding Polish spelling yes but "Danielovich" it seems to be poor translation of Russian. Neverless, its no big deal - it can stay as it is. Again, thank You for taking time to improve! If I can help in any way in matter of medieval history regarding Poland or Russia, I would be glad to do so. best regards, Camdan (talk) 21:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
moved from my userpageALEX PLEASE RETURN ALL THE INFORMATION YOU TRASHED TO INGUSHETIA WEBPAGE OTHERWISE I WILL REPORT YOU. Disambiguation link notification for October 26Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Novgorod Republic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Votive Church. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC) DYK nomination of One-day votive churches
DYK for One-day votive churches On 16 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article One-day votive churches, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that medieval Russians sometimes built churches in one day to ward off epidemics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/One-day votive churches. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, One-day votive churches), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC) ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Incomplete DYK nomination
DYK nomination of Demographic history of Russia
DYK for Demographic history of RussiaOn 21 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Demographic history of Russia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that most Russian cities were destroyed as a result of the Mongol invasion? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Demographic history of Russia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Demographic history of Russia), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 21 January 2021 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for March 8An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heniochi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abkhaz. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Your answerHi Alaexis, I am writing this message to remind you that our discussion on Navalny's article is pending[1] (and many other topics have been blocked for months). I take this opportunity to specify that in these discussions my tones are "unfriendly" but not because of you, on the contrary I appreciate your honesty and neutrality in this matter. As you may know, I'm only having problems with that user. See you soon.--Mhorg (talk) 07:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Vyatka LandOn 28 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vyatka Land, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the history of Vyatka Land was said to be more obscure than that of any other Russian region? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vyatka Land. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Vyatka Land), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Graham PhillipsHello, just wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Graham_Phillips_(journalist)_(2nd_nomination) and invite to take part in the discussion. Cloud200 (talk) 08:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC) Russian involvement in Syrian civil warPoint of mentioning earlier debt write-offs was to counter earlier point by another user; to offer an alternative explanation. It makes no sense to say that financial considerations are of primary importance when you write off 9.6 billion dollars in debt. Esp. in a section entitled "Economic importance and history of arms sales;" this section is not just about the Syrian civil war. Since you changed that, I don't really mind the change. Alternative explanations still present, but I did add an edit of your text for transition words, esp. since the sentences now contradicted each other. QoL changes! Knightoften (talk) 07:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Notice
Alexbrn (talk) 19:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC) Could you please explain this edit? [2] We had an RFC, the result of which was to keep "alleged by Armenia". You have just removed "alleged by Armenia" by hiding it, in violation of WP:CONSENSUS. I'm sure you understand that this is an arbitration covered article, and editing against consensus is not acceptable. Thank you. Grandmaster 12:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
DS NoticeThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. –dlthewave ☎ 12:36, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Re RFC on Assange TalkHi - you recently contributed and voted in an RFC on the Julian Assange Talk page and showed some support for option F. Another editor has pointed to a difficulty with that wording which I have addressed with the following slightly altered version: “Assange received the emails when Rich was already dead, and conferred with Guccifer 2.0 (a persona thought to have been created by Russian hackers) in order to coordinate the release of the material." I would be very grateful if you could let me/us know if the changed wording meets your approval so I can substitute it for the existing F option. Thanks Prunesqualor billets_doux 13:42, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
TiraspolHello! I added in the category Moldova-Poland Relations to Tiraspol because, as the entry for Tyraspol in Polish Wikipedia states: "W Tyraspolu mieszka kilkaset osób narodowości polskiej. Tyraspol jest jednym z głównych skupisk Polaków w Mołdawii." To translate that into English: "Several hundred people of Polish nationality live in Tiraspol. Tiraspol is one of the main centers of Poles in Moldova." In my estimation, that fact makes it worthy of adding in the category of Moldova-Poland relations. As to why that is, my guess that it is because Tiraspol is the capital of Transnistria. --Orestek (talk) 21:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Twin Pagodas (Suzhou)On 20 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Twin Pagodas (Suzhou), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Twin Pagodas of Suzhou (pictured) have been compared to ink brushes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Twin Pagodas (Suzhou). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Twin Pagodas (Suzhou)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Maile (talk) 00:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC) Reliable sources noticeboard editI reverted your edit to RSN, since it blanked the entire page. It looks like you may have accidentally done that, since it looks like your request was in the edit summary field rather than on the page. If you were trying to start a discussion, you might want to have another go at that. Seraphimblade Talk to me 13:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Good article reassessment of NATO pageNATO has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Morgoonki (talk) 11:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC) Sorry for disturbingDear friend, We had long discussion about afghanistan ethno-lingustic map, the cia map is wrong, for example according to english wikipedia :th major ethnicity in balkh province is tajiks, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balkh_Province While according to cia map uzbeks are!!! Wich is Completely inaccurate!! But according to my map is based on Al-Jazeera and according to my map the majority of balkh are tajiks. According to russian and persian wikipedia about balkh province i saw the major ethnicity is tajiks, cia map is old and is a governomental organization and i think Al-Jazeera is more reliable than an inteligence agency!! 5644Khorasani (talk) 07:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Sorry couldn't answer there, tajiks and hazaras are main ethnics in balkh there is small uzbek https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balkh_Province&ved=2ahUKEwiP6MPRvrb3AhXgQvEDHdbEDBAQFnoECEkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2ECuExuez91NU96cbPa7KK Balkh os motly tajik and hazars(persian speakers) there is no hazara in balkh, according to wikipedia uzbeks are just 10%, you can see it in the wiki pedia page, uzbeks are just 10% 5644Khorasani (talk) 09:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Crisis of the late 16th century in Russia
DYK for Crisis of the late 16th century in RussiaOn 3 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Crisis of the late 16th century in Russia, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as a result of the crisis of the late 16th century in Russia, many service-class landowners were left with no peasants working their land? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crisis of the late 16th century in Russia. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Crisis of the late 16th century in Russia), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 02:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC) ARBPIA DS alertThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place Iskandar323 (talk) 09:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC) RFC attacks on Donetsk People's RepublicHello, I am writing to you because you said you were interested in opening a RfC on the missile in Donetsk. Note that since we last spoke about this I created a section "Indiscriminate attacks">"Donetsk People's Republic" and a new subsection for the recent Maisky Market attack. You can see the final result here [3]. Unfortunately MVBW removed everything [4] and [5] so I think a RfC is necessary. As soon as I can, I would like to open a discussion at RS/N on whether Danisova can be considered as a WP:RS with regard to sexual crimes committed in Ukraine during the invasion [6], and I'm wondering if the two discussions can be opened together or if there's any reason for prioritizing one over the other. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 17:06, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
RfC Notice War crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Gitz (talk) (contribs) 11:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC) hello - nice to meet youThanks for your work on the Patrick Lancaster page. 666hopedieslast (talk) 23:26, 14 July 2022 (UTC) DS alertThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place Adoring nanny (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add December 2022
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! |
