Hello, I'm Haploidavey. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hermes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please supply a reliable source for any changes you make. As far as I know, the Greek god of winter (and the north wind) is Boreas. The only typo you seem to have fixed is the one you introduced yourself.Haploidavey (talk) 12:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia only accepts information from reliable, published specialist sources. Their nationality is not relevant, only their scholarly credentials, reputation and publications. Take a look at WP:RS and WP:Citing sources, please.Haploidavey (talk) 16:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Where are you finding that Boreas is a "God of protection?" What does that even mean?? You didn't offer a source for what you added. And please stop giving exactly the same edit summary for every edit; you didn't fix a typo. Haploidavey (talk) 21:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Akaora! Your additions to Agathodaemon have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. The material you added was a direct and unacknowledged copy from an Academia.edu article (either of doubtful copyright, or republished with permission of its author, João Feliciano) https://www.academia.edu/27115429/The_Agathos_Daimon_in_Greco_Egyptian_religion. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 14:30, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Being sorry does not compensate for your errors and apparent inability or unwillingness to edit within rules and policy. If you keep on this way, you'll end up being blocked (unable to edit at all, in order to protect the integrity of the encyclopedia). Read the Wikipedia rules. They're not so difficult. Haploidavey (talk) 14:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Akaora: You have never presented a reliable source that says Hermes was a god of winter, therefore you must not add such claims to Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Verifiability, one of our most important policies. Your chain of reasoning above - that association with corpses makes one a god of winter because corpses are cold - is entirely inadequate. I read on your talk page that "I just wanted a greek god who is an olympian to be associated with winter" and we can believe that is your motive, but it does not justify knowingly adding your fabrication to Wikipedia. You must stop doing that, otherwise you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NebY (talk) 21:12, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You are quoting the addition you yourself made to the Greek Wikipedia[1] and which is contrary to the source quoted there[1]. I have that book beside me as I write, open to that section. It does not say Hermes is a god of winter. You are knowingly inserting your own invention. Stop. NebY (talk) 21:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Copied from my talk page as the issues are with Akaora's editing.NebY (talk) 14:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Kuraokami Is the god of winter and storms since he is an asian dragon because those dragons are associated with protection, good luck and power. Also chinese/japanese dragons are mino weather deities since they bring water, breath Clouds and move the seasons Akaora (talk) 14:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your enthusiasm is clear but your editing, your mention of your "reached", which I guess is a typo for "teacher", your phrasing and use of talk pages, and your repeated unwillingness to follow and perhaps even read Wikipedia policies even after we've pointed you to them, all give the impression of a comparatively young editor. If so, it might well be best if you don't edit Wikipedia again until you've enjoyed some more years of education and growing maturity. NebY (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
One user, one account
I noticed that in the editing history of Agathodaemon and other articles, User:Akatiger is editing the same articles as you, using exactly the same edit summaries as you (see Special:Contributions/Akatiger) and just as indiscriminately. The names employ the same "aka" prefix. Do both these user-names belong to a single individual editor, namely yourself? If so, please be warned that the use of multiple accounts is discouraged in Wikipedia, except under particular circumstances, and disclosure of multiple accounts is essential. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry and reply here. Haploidavey (talk) 16:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ryujin
Im sorry for what I did to ryujin but I kuraokami the picture o uploaded was True. It is true that human its kuraokami in his Dragon form and I have saw it from a japanese site Akaora (talk) 22:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kuraokami 750xjpeg.jpeg
File Copyright problem
Thanks for uploading File:Kuraokami 750xjpeg.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.
If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.
Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Good block. I was about to do the block myself. Akaora, you don't seem to be getting it. This is a collaborative community. You don't attempt to force your way on articles. See our policy at Wikipedia:Edit warring. Further, you kept on refusing to provide any citations to reliable, secondary sources. If you expect to be unblocked, you need to address this concerns and how you intend on conducting yourself in the future. As is, you've exhausted the patience of the community. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:00, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello please I beg you unblock me Im sorry for what I did to Wikipedia and I wont do that again I just wanna add a new page well a page that it exist but it is half right now Akaora (talk) 20:14, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
please unblock me. Im sorry for what I did I won't do that again I promise I just want to add more pictures and pages
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
