User talk:Akakievich
Faraj, the proper spelling of FarageWhy are you blocking accuracy improvements to the page on the arabic name Faraj? Farage is merely an anglicised version of Faraj, and there is *no* evidence, anywhere, that this was a Huguenot name. Why do you continue to promote an utterly unsupported lie? Are you fit to be doing this 'editing' job? You seem incompetent to me. Ahh, you have history here... The Signpost: 9 March 2023
Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter
The Signpost: 20 March 2023
A barnstar for you!
Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:50, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging Rollback grantedHi Akakievich. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:29, 7 June 2023 (UTC) Comments on Svitlana BoytsaniukHello. I would like to ask you regarding your comments on the nomination of Svitlana Boytsaniuk. Although I have decided to move beyond the work of monitoring regurarly articles for deletion, I would like to know better your argumentation to gain more experience on this field. With my WP:BEFORE I nominated this article, I have seen all the sources you mention and the biographic details, but I made the exactly opposite conclusion from your comment (proposal for deletion instead of keep). At first, you mention that this scientist has held a highest-level post at a major academic institution. While she is dean of a specific faculty (not of the whole university), the university itself doesn't possess the criteria to be considered as a major academic institution. Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University is not included in any major university rankings (QS, Times Higher Education) and is only 93th among Ukrainian universities in Webometrics, that's why I consider it as local or regional academic institution (not a major one). Also, you mention a table with sources of articles that I have checked before my nomination, articles that discuss one specific project as a war relief effort. Based on the sources of this project, you justify WP:GNG; however, I saw it as WP:BLP1E, WP:SUSTAINED and what it's mentioned as "If reliable sources cover a person only in the context of a single event, and if that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual, we should generally avoid having a biographical article on that individual". Is that similar to the case of the project for soldiers and refugees and the scientist is only notable for this one? Since, the academic institution may not be considered as major in terms of university rankings in Ukraine, how WP:GNG is finally validated? I would like your help on this example to better understand the criteria of Afds for the future, since you may have more experience. Thank you, Chiserc (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Dubliany, Rivne OblastHello! Your submission of Dubliany, Rivne Oblast at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:55, 26 November 2023 (UTC) ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add DYK for Dubliany, Rivne OblastOn 3 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dubliany, Rivne Oblast, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that according to local legend, the St. Nicholas Church in Dubliany, Rivne Oblast, was built there by accident following a clerical error? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dubliany, Rivne Oblast. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dubliany, Rivne Oblast), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |