User talk:Aecis/Messages 157-168

User talk:Aecis
Archived messages
Messages 1-12 • Messages 13-24 • Messages 25-36 • Messages 37-48 • Messages 49-60 • Messages 61-72 • Messages 73-84 • Messages 85-96 • Messages 97-108 • Messages 109-120 • Messages 121-132 • Messages 133-144 • Messages 145-156 • Messages 157-168 • Messages 169-180 • Messages 181-192 • Messages 193-204 • Messages 205-216 • Messages 217-228 • Messages 229-240 • Messages 241-252 • Messages 253-264 • Messages 265-276 • Messages 277-288 • Messages 289-300 • Messages 301-312 • Messages 313-324 • Messages 325-336 • Messages 337-348 • Messages 349-360 • Messages 361-372 • Messages 373-384 • Messages 385-396 • Messages 397-408 • Messages 409-420 • Messages 421-432 • Messages 433-444 • Messages 445-456 • Messages 457-468 • Messages 469-480 • Messages 481-492 • Messages 493-504 • Messages 505-516
Archived Wikipedia Signposts
Signposts 1-12 • Signposts 13-24 • Signposts 25-36 • Signposts 37-48 • Signposts 49-60 • Signposts 61-72 • Signposts 73-84 • Signposts 85-96 • Signposts 97-108
Archived newsletters
Alternative music: 1-12 • 13-24
Formula One: 1-12 •
Military history: 1-12 • 13-24

From cinnamon colbert re wikicriticism.

So, if I find someone who has published a paper criticizing wiki, then it is ok ? Surely, you would allow (doesnt that say it all)an article on the lines of "Paper reference works - problems avoided with online reference works". Or how about an article, sociology of wiki editors as example of group self presevation; just as , say police officers or teachers or any group defends its members, fairly or unfairly, you aare defending wiki editors... I could go on, but whats the point: you have POWER and are not afraid to use it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cinnamon colbert (talk • contribs)

new interest

Hi Aecis, that Turkey football vandal seems to be your new interest:) (S)He is really highly motivated on this vandalising thing, he has been vandalising for about 6 months. Btw, thanks for your interest. --Ugur Basak 11:19, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for my late reply. I came across Burak18 some time ago, via Ajax Amsterdam and Netherlands national football team, which are both in my watchlist. It took a while before the thought of widespread vandalism dawned on me, and it was Konst.able who first mentioned the name of Burak18 to me. I now try to keep track of his sockpuppets as much as possible on Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Burak18. If you come across a new sock, could you add that to the category as well? Thanks a lot for reverting the vandalism :) Aecis Dancing to electro-pop like a robot from 1984. 00:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No problem Aecis:) He seems to revert these pages everyday, here is his last sock User:Rickysdjunk, i've added it to sock category. You can block it. Actually there is a new, sock user he is working on a different Turkey football club article. Do you want me to show you evidences, if it's necessary. He is revert warring with a user with different user names:) --Ugur Basak 11:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wtf why did u delete my page

wtf why did u delete my page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Defiance0fchaos (talk • contribs)

Sorry, if I caused trouble

  • hey, thanks a lot for cleaning up that complaint on Francis Schonken. i had misspelled his name the first time, then i couldnt relocate my report, thats why i refiled, i guess a couple of times. i dont know how you did it, but you retrieved the correct one, and all is now well. Thanks much. Stevewk 00:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fabolous cleanup

You placed a cleanup tag on the Fabolous article, after which cleanup work was done to it. If you have no objections I would like to remove the tag, or if you believe additional work is required please point out any further weaknesses you find. Seraphimblade 04:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied article

Thanks for moving the Jason Bekiaris page to the user page - saved me the trouble of doing my first AfD, which I wasn't looking forward to! :) Bubba hotep 14:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

I've seen other people do this, too. How is this "fixing" the redirect? -- Steel 15:37, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me regardless of capitals. Does User:Steel359/Sandbox not redirect you? -- Steel 15:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

An automated review of content on Wikipedia has discovered that your August 2004 contributions to the article on Edouard Vuillard were copied from another website. They have been removed. Please keep in mind that doing so is a copyright infringement and not acceptable on Wikipedia.

If you are aware of any other instances in which you may have done this, please bring them to our attention so that the situation can be remedied. DS 17:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion of my Band article

<Directed towards http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candy_Pain> I noticed you deleted my article on a local band, I dont understand how you see this as article notable for deletion, i specified that i had work to do on it and also added the "hang on" tag. Now my article was on topic, it was related to the band and information on them, they have passed the band test by 'Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise'. If you had let me finish my page like i asked maybe then i would added more reasons why the band meets requirements.

I mean come on... you have 'http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodnight_Nurse' Thats pretty much the same to what i added, except their first album would be coming out tonight and i was going to add it on. But yea if you cant see a reason as to why my article should be placed back up then keep it that way, but i have alot more work to do to it, tonight they are recording their DVD, releasing their album and appearing at another gig, so please consider adding it back up again.

Thanks ~Josh

China as an emerging superpower for GA

Here, here!Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 23:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Landon Ashworth on deletion review

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Landon Ashworth. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. The choice to delete Landon Ashworth has been protested by several users. Please review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.34.48.114 (talk • contribs)

Jyllands-Posten

It looks like this guy is utilizng NYU's IPs and they're on 128.122.0.0/16, however, blocking NYU doesn't sound right.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't revert vandalism dude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.122.89.58 (talk • contribs)

Unprotect the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.122.89.58 (talk • contribs)

You should ban that Ryulong guy. He keeps deleting my posts everywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.122.89.58 (talk • contribs)

You should have stopped editting Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy as you did, now leave us be, please?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 00:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is whack and you know it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.122.89.58 (talk • contribs)