User talk:Advait.kansal

Article: Atul Raghav

Hi, May I know why do you think the tournaments are not notable? This article passes WP:GNG because it has reliable coverage of different events and also pass WP:NSPORTS as there's no special criteria given for Taekwondo. Also, go through the article of Aruna Singh Tanwar and check the tournaments record. She also participated in G Ranked tournaments at first and then qualified for Asian, World Championships and for Olympics. NOTE: No athlete can compete in Asian, World or Olympics without winning a medal in G-Ranking tournaments. However, you won't find much Indian news article covering G Ranking championships but you'll find the results of the matches and as well as articles with extra efforts. I'm linking those for you all.

• [/ 8th Fujairah by World Taekwondo]
• [/ fujairah-all-set-to-host-the-biggest-international-taekwondo-championship-in-the-region-1.69304050]
• [/ 8th Fujairah]
• [/ Pakistan Taekwondo]
• [/ Taekwondo Nepal]
• [/fujairah-g2-international-taekwondo-championship-ends-on-a-high-note ]

There are many more coverage on the internet and here is the SGFI profile of the subject. [/ 64th National Games:Atul Raghav(Player)] Thanks Divineplus (talk) 16:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

I think the article needs to be deleted because it doesn't meet the standards.

• Winning gold medal in Council for the Indian School Certificate Examinations doesn't establish notability as per Wikipedia guidelines.
• All references provided in the article are not reliable with exception to Dainik jagran which is a leading national daily. Advait (talk) 08:27, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The only standard it needs to meet is WP:GNG, and I feel it has passed that. NemesisAT (talk) 11:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But the subject also won bronze medal in G-2 Fujairah Dubai 2020Divineplus (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Move of Sujay Datta Ray

Please do not move articles to draft-space while they are being discussed at AFD, as you did at Sujay Datta Ray. If the result of that discussion is draftify then it will be moved by the administrator who closes the discussion. It is not appropriate to pre-empt the result of that discussion. St★lwart^111 05:24, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Stalwart111: Thanks for your message. I'll take care of this in future. Advait (talk) 11:50, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. St★lwart^111 12:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sameer Wankhede for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sameer Wankhede is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sameer Wankhede until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 09:24, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Venkat TL - I find him to be a notable public servant. You probably missed the other events where he led the investigations which are mentioned in the article. Nonetheless, I have put forward my case for keeping the article. Let's see what the consensus is reached on this.Advait (talk) 09:35, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of non useful AKTU Colleges

He, take a look at these colleges and nominate them if you find them not notable. Thanks.

• Accurate Institute of Management and Technology
• ACN College of Engineering and Management Studies
• Aligarh College of Engineering and Technology
• Ambalika Institute of Management and Technology
• Babu Banarsi Das Institute of Engineering Technology & Research Centre
• Delhi Institute of Engineering and Technology
• Devprayag Institute of Technical Studies
• DJ College of Engineering And Technology
• Dronacharya Group of Institutions
• Feroze Gandhi Institute of Engineering and Technology
• HMFA Memorial Institute of Engineering and Technology
• IMS Engineering College
• Institute of Technology and Science, Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad
• Institute of Engineering and Technology, Ayodhya
• Institute of Engineering & Technology, Bareilly
• JagMohan Institute of Management and Technology
• Kali Charan Nigam Institute of Technology
• Kanpur Institute of Technology
• Kishori Lal Sharma Institute of Engineering and Technology
• Krishna Engineering College
• Krishna Institute of Technology
• Lord Krishna College of Engineering
• Madani Technical Institute
• Maharana Institute of Professional Studies
• Moradabad Institute of Technology
• Mount Zion College of Engineering
• R.D. Engineering College Ghaziabad
• Raja Balwant Singh College
• Rakshpal Bahadur College of Engineering and Technology
• S.R. Institute of Management & Technology
• Sagar Institute of Technology and Management
• Shri Ram Murti Smarak College of Engineering and Technology Unnao
• Shri Ram Murti Smarak College of Engineering, Technology & Research
• SP Memorial Institute of Technology
• Sree Buddha College of Engineering, Elavumthitta
• Sunder Deep Group of Institutions
• Translam Institute of Technology and Management
• U.P. Institute of Design, Noida
• University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kanpur
• Veera College of Engineering
• Vidya College of Engineering

2409:4063:4C9E:1926:7B7B:CD79:91A3:8BA7 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 21:48, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Article: Institute of Engineering and Technology, Ayodhya

Institute of Engineering and Technology, Ayodhya is a reputed engineering college in District Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh, India which is affiliated with Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Univeristy Ayodhya and approved by AICTE. This page must be continue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajitkumarpanicker (talk • contribs) 04:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ajitkumarpanicker Thanks for your message, please put up your case at the discussion page. Please provide references to support the notability of the institute as per notability guidelines. The article and references currently only suggest the existence of the institute. Please note there was a request from another user asking to evaluate some articles and based on my accessment this article doesn't meet notability standards of Wikipedia.

You can put your reasons at the discussion page, the admin will decide the case based on evidences / arguments on record. Advait (talk) 06:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Sameer Wankhede article

This is a very important article and thanks a lot for creating it. -- Dr. Abhijeet Safai (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Abhijeet Safai Thanks for your appreciation. Advait (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not following AFD guidelines

Please read Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#Recommendations_and_outcomes and follow the standard guidelines of commenting. Venkat TL (talk) 12:17, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Advait.kansal. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Dreamy Jazz ^talk to me | my contributions 12:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Advait.kansal! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:14, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]