Hello, Abu Wan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Hi Wikipedia - how come Abu Wan keeps applying changes and large bodies of defamatory content onto Amber Heard's "Charity & Activism" page despite "not having an account"? That seems fishy, does it not? Demi26x (talk) 11:46, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure what Demi26x is talking about because I fail to see what about the information I added is "defamatory" and I do have a Wikipedia account (Abu Wan?). Abu Wan (talk) 16:37, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, paid PR guy. By "not having an account" I mean that you do not have an active user page and appear to only be on Wikipedia in an attempt to paint Amber Heard in a good light, despite her being proven to have lied about rape in a court of law. You added a BUNCH of defamatory information to her page - including information about her arrest for domestic violence and about her UN situation. But if this is the angle you're going to play in public, I'll make it a private matter and report your submissions so that Wikipedia can put a stop to paid PR accounts infesting this website. Demi26x (talk) 19:58, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Demi26x. You keep making outrageous claims about my edits of that particular article, which are altogether puzzling to me. While it's understandable, in the context of the Depp v. Heard trial, that there would be many, like yourself, who have their own prejudicial interests in that page, I think that it's going against Wikipedia's policies to engage in the kind of personal attacks that you're engaging in right now (I noticed that you even tried to sabotage another article that I'm working on).
Wikipedia is a free and open space. I simply added to the article in question information that I had and that I did not find included in there when I was going through it. And I cited every piece of information that I added to it. So your accusation that I added "a BUNCH of defamatory information" is, to say the least, patently absurd. Of course any editor (with necessary access) is free to check that information and confirm that it abides by Wikipedia's policies and make their own appropriate modifications if need be. As such, I'm not moved by your threats; in fact, I welcome them. I invite you to "report" my edits of the page to any higher-ranking editors because I would really love it for them to review them and ensure that they're as accurate, balanced, and well-cited as I believe they are. That way, the quality of the page would be improved and I'll be much happier for it because, after all, this is what I aim for in my edits.
Thank you for letting me know. I've never used the Talk pages before so while I did everything I can to abide by the rules, I unintentionally missed that one. I'll be sure to do so going forward. Again, thanks for the information. Abu Wan (talk) 16:33, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janice Griffith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Abu Wan!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! StarMississippi17:30, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janice Griffith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Abu Wan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Janice Griffith, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Hi, I noticed you have removed a number of edits I made to this page with no supporting information about why they were removed. I have readded these, and would welcome a chat before you make any further edits to information I added before simply removing it. Thank you. A fragment of your life (talk) 18:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
