User talk:Abcmaxx/Archives/2019


Nearest professional club to Stadium MK is ..... LTFC!

The article (#Rivalries) says that Northampton Town is the closest. Google Maps says it is 21.5 miles away stadium to stadium but that Luton Town is 19.5 miles away. On the other hand, CMK to NTN centre is probably close than CMK to LTN centre, though. I think that there have been a lot more MKD-NTFC matches than MKD-LTFC matches, though? Some of these rivalries (esp WWFC) are a bit manufactured by the media and I think that adding LTFC might be another. Is worth the effort to change anything (I'm not bothered). --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:44, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Well the Northampton one is very much the closest club that can be easily considered a rival and probably the most fierce in recent years especially compared to Wycombe and Luton. The South Northamptonshire area or even Newport Pagnell is definitely a catchment area for both clubs, a lot of overlap. I would not say Wycombe is manufactured, nor Stevenage for example, as fans of both definitely have a strong dislike of the Dons more so than normal, but definitely way off the likes of Peterborough and Northampton. Luton would be fierce had it not been for the fact the two never play each other. May be amend to say there is only c.20 miles between the two without using the word 'closest'? Abcmaxx (talk) 10:23, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Speedway in Poland

Template:Speedway in Poland has been nominated for merging with Template:Example. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Trialpears (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Poznań–Ławica Airport into 31st Air Base. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:26, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Milton Keynes Dons F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Watson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Pomezania Malbork

Hi Abcmaxx. I have started the page Pomezania Malbork, and I know it's one of the clubs listed on your profile that you feel should be made. While I have started to learn which Polish websites to use for effective referencing, I know and could find very little about Pomezania Malbork. As you're Polish I was hoping you'd be able to have a look and add references or any useful information you could find to add to the notoriety of the page. Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thank you, OLLSZCZ (talk) 12:43, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@OLLSZCZ I added some external links :) The article looks great though! Abcmaxx (talk) 17:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

@Abcmaxx thank you for doing that :) OLLSZCZ (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Abcmaxx/Archives/2019. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Usedtobecool TALK ✨ 19:37, 15 November 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)