Hello, AO111AO111AO, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. —C.Fred (talk) 02:14, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The statement was that he, himself, advocates Fascism. Which he does, in his blog that was cited."AO111AO111AO (talk) 02:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Not in the edit that I reverted. Nor was it his blog, the more I look at it. —C.Fred (talk) 02:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Perry Noble. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Arxiloxos (talk) 20:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Perry Noble. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A blog post from a hosting service like blogspot or wordpress is almost never a reliable source; I don't see anything to suggest this blog is an exception. —C.Fred (talk) 02:09, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The blog is written by Perry Noble. In it, he encourages his followers to bring their religion into government, which is Fascism.AO111AO111AO (talk) 02:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Then it is subject to the added restrictions on self-published sources. —C.Fred (talk) 02:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Which includes that they can't be used to support information about anybody other than the subject. Since it was supporting a statement about how others view Noble, we can't use the blog as a source. —C.Fred (talk) 02:28, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
″it was not supporting a statement of how others viewed him. It said he advocates Fascism, which he does in his own words, on the blog I cited. ″AO111AO111AO (talk) 02:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The source does not support the assertion, as far as I can see. Your statement that he advocates fascism is your own conclusion reached by impermissible synthesis. See Wikipedia:No original research. Repeatedly accusing a living person of fascism in this manner is a pretty serious violation of Wikipedia policy.--Arxiloxos (talk) 02:51, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You know how this is going to end—you will be blocked and all your edits will be removed. Please save us the bother.
Wikipedia is not the place to wage a campaign. Have a look at other articles—how many of them include negative commentary based on the opinions of opponents? Johnuniq (talk) 02:17, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- AO111AO111AO, I get that you're putting in what you see as fact. You've sourced his blog for that, and according to the editors above, it doesn't actually say that. That creates a problem, see, per Wiki's guidelines for writing about living people you'd need to have a reliable source that actually says Perry Noble is fascist. They can't imply it, they can't have a quote by him that you point to and say "See , he's fascist!". The reliable source needs to say that he's fascist. Reliable sources are those that have an editorial oversight on them (I.E but not limited to Time, People, Local Newspapers...etc....) (no tabloids however). If you have a reliable source and it outright says Perry Noble's fascist you can use it, otherwise the claim you're making has to be removed, please don't continue to put it back in, you can be blocked for doing so. KoshVorlon ..Doves cried 04/21/2016 15:37, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
