User talk:A930913/Archives/2014/Apr
I don't or didn't think I posted this<ref>Erlewine, Stephen Thomas. [{{Allmusic|class=artist|id=p5255|pure_url=yes}} "The Replacements > Biography".] Allmusic. Retrieved 2008-02-03.</ref> I don't / didn't think I posted this. I can't find it in my postings and I don't know how to fix it, sorry. :)
Andhra Pradesh page errorCan you tell me on which topic or line is the error you have detected. Vin09 (talk) 06:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
stop writing on my talk pagePut me on a black list or something. RefBot has added hundreds of links to my talk page. Stop it. (I don't mind bracketbot & the rest. they're useful) — kwami (talk) 00:31, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
ThanksI am thankful to you and keep on guiding me.Rajsector3 (talk) 03:49, 6 April 2014 (UTC) Can I just leave a quick message to say that BracketBot is awesome?Because it is. You rock. People like you make Wikipedia great. --FeldBum (talk) 17:01, 9 April 2014 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
User message wordingIt occurs to me that we quite often see strange entries on this talk page, addressed to BracketBot as the fount of all knowledge on anything Wikipedian. This may be in part to do with the user message, which says in part: "...if you have any questions, leave a message on my operator's talk page". This leaves it open not only to the type of questions you may be expecting, like "why did BracketBot pick up on my excellent brackets?" but to others, out to "who made the stars?" Recall that almost everyone who edits makes slips with brackets - even *I* do - but especially newbies, and the BracketBot message may well be the one and only time that a user ever sees a message come up on their own talk page, ie that they ever get any personal feedback from Wikipedia. So it must look like their invite to ask any and all questions. I'd suggest considering tweaking the message to read something like: "...if you wish to respond to this message about bracket placement, please... and if you have any other query or comment about Wikipedia, you are welcome to contact our help desk at..." Just an idea: Noyster (talk), 19:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
William J. Cullerton articleThanks for the attempt to help me correct the material (and many) errors concerning Bill Cullerton's WWII combat record. Having said that, the 'rules' for first establishing my personal authority on this subject, as well as the confusing steps to cite as reference my recently published book on the history of the 355th FG caused me to abandon the effort. Regards, James W. (Bill) Marshall, author of "Angels, Bulldogs and Dragons -History of the 355th FG in WWII"; Champlin Press, Mesa, AZ 1984 and most recently "Our Might Always: The 355th FG in WWII - Volume I"; Schiffer Publications Ltd., Atglen PA, 2014. Nobody is as well informed on the history of the 355th FG, 355th TFW and 355th FW from 1942 through current date. Drgondog (talk) 15:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)Drgondog
Thank you!I'm sorry for not replying (failed to notice), and thank you for pointing and I appreciate your help! Best Regards (User:Gamera1123) — Preceding undated comment added 15:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, BracketBot. I fixed both problems. -- BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 21:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
BracketBot – Carlitos9305thank you very much !! Hello, I'm Carlitos9305 you were right about the issue, I had sintaxys errors, and corrected the error in Comparison of TeX editors — Preceding undated comment added 20:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
|