User talk:99of9/Archive 2

Archive
99of9's Archives

Archive 1
Archive 2
Archive 3

Circle Packing

It has been a while since I edited Wikipedia and I am dealing with talk page messages in reverse chronological order. Well done on solving the problem on circle packing. I think though it really should be sourced before being added back to the article. But very interesting to see your solution! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captainj (talk • contribs) 23:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, it's been a while! --99of9 (talk) 23:58, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FA

I re-nominated the giraffe article. You did some reviewing in the last nomination. Why do be able to look it over again and come to a decision? LittleJerry (talk) 03:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Use of your photograph

Thanks for letting me know about my photograph being used! Could you send me some more information about where the sign is located, etc., so that when I contact the museum they'll know exactly which picture I'm talking about? Thanks so much. --Tewy 22:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info! It should be plenty to contact them with. --Tewy 04:00, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kyle Sandilands

No, my comment was not libellous. Nice try though! - 58.163.175.192 (talk) 12:56, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Abricta curvicosta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Opercula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedians to the Games

Hey. I didn't want to make it seem like I was ignoring you. :) Been busy. Fantastic on the FL nomination. Even if you might not be able to attend, it is worth signing up anyway in case you might... There are two rounds and if things change and you can't do things, there are ways for us to compensate for that. :) But yay! Content fixing. :D --LauraHale (talk) 12:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 99of9. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports.
Message added 08:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Bgwhite (talk) 08:15, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Floury Baker cicada
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Floury Baker cicada side.JPG, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012 Move-to-Commons drive

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Images and Media at 07:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Re:Overlinking

Hello, 99of9. You have new messages at Lproven's talk page.
Message added -- Trevj (talk) 14:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Thanks for the note Trevj, I'm glad you brought this to my attention. --99of9 (talk) 23:04, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This doesn't really need saying... but I'm sure you're aware that such things are usually the result of cumulative effects, rather than one-off actions by individuals. -- Trevj (talk) 11:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Nevertheless, it's not fun to be the straw that broke the camel's back - especially when it seems to be a misinterpretation. 99of9 (talk) 11:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orange Spider Wasp

Well such an awesome creature needed a Wikipedia page, re-used your pic for the Pepsinae page.Quetzal1964 19:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quetzal1964 (talk • contribs)

Your HighBeam account is ready!

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

  • Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
    • Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
    • If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
  • The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
  • To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
  • If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
  • A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
  • HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
  • Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
  • When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:29, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smithsonian Institution Archives

Hey 99of9! So happy that you came by the Smithsonian Institution Archives project and signed up to participate! We've got a great list of subjects that need to be improved upon or written about. I do hope you'll visit the to-do list and do let me know if you need anything. And of course, your contributions can earn you the official oh so fancy SIA barnstar :) Thanks again! So happy to have you on board! SarahStierch (talk) 23:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thanks for your efforts in the January 2012 MTC Drive! Cloudbound (talk) 21:28, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinews help

Hi. Can you do a copy edit of No surprises in 2012/2013 Australian federal budget for sport‎? --LauraHale (talk) 06:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New CfD

Since you participated in earlier CfDs about related categories, I want to make sure you know about Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 May 12#Category:Church buildings in the United States by state. --Orlady (talk) 22:47, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

St John's

Hello, 99of9. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Whiteghost.ink (talk) 06:15, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Joshua Jefferis

Thanks from the DYK team. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Australian Summer Paralympians article help request

Hey. In honour of Australia at the 2012 Summer Paralympics, I'm trying to get articles created about members of the team who don't have articles yet. This is a fairly big job and I could use a bit of assistance. If you have time, can you add information and sources to articles, add pictures to articles (Flickr? Commons?), fix prose on articles where sources have been included now (mostly men's athletics) and otherwise help prep them for DYK? I'd be happy to give you credit at DYK for all the articles you help improve. Thanks in advance. --LauraHale (talk) 05:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Annie Wyatt

Hi 99of9,

Is Annie Forsyth Wyatt good enough for DYK now? If she is, could you nominate her under both our names? She might get more of the recognition she deserves. :) Also, I don't think it is stub class any more. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 04:17, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Laura might nominate it for us - I have suggested this hook to her: "Did you Know that Annie Wyatt, the driving force behind Australia's National Trust was also a prison visitor to some of Sydney's most notorious women criminals?" Whiteghost.ink (talk) 09:22, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated! See Template:Did you know nominations/Annie Wyatt Whiteghost.ink (talk) 12:13, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the repair work on the Annie Wyatt article. I have removed one of the fluffy sentences and added another reference to DoS for the last paragraph where the 'A' list is mentioned. Hope that's right. In regard to sources cited in the DoS article, I just learned that Wittylama was advised as part of the Good Article review for Florence Violet McKenzie that while it's fine to import DoS's citations, unless you have checked them yourself, the right approach is to include "cited in Dictionary of Sydney". So I have added this tag to the relevant refs in this article. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 03:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IP Autoblock

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
99of9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
129.78.32.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "George.m.mackenzie". The reason given for George.m.mackenzie's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: sock of [[User:Kolling

Decline reason: Procedural decline of IP unblock; IP exemption granted. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:43, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This IP address is shared by the entire University of Sydney. Please exempt me from IP autoblocks. I am long serving editor in good standing, and have never nor will ever use sockpuppets. --99of9 (talk) 06:23, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

IP exemption granted. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:41, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --99of9 (talk) 10:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic medals

Nice. :D Good to know. :D Need to write those statistics up. :) (Back from holiday and now to work on Paralympian articles in advance of the game. No desire to DYK for a long while.) --LauraHale (talk) 04:13, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to Sydney for the welcome back thing? I think I know some one who was thinking of going to Sydney for it. --LauraHale (talk) 04:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've just looked it up and put it on my calendar, but I'm teaching that morning, so I guess it's unlikely. --99of9 (talk) 04:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL

At that edit summary ... I have no idea how that happened. :-) Graham87 15:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guessed you would spot my edit summary :-).

DYK for Annie Forsyth Wyatt

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:CooksRiverSatellite.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:CooksRiverSatellite.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --99of9 (talk) 11:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Bulwersator (talk) 13:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a classical music edit-a-thon Saturday week (13 October) in Sydney. The theme will be Music of France, to coincide with the ABC Classic FM countdown between 8-14 October. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online during the countdown. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/October 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 10:05, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Sydney edit-a-thon invitation

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a disability edit-a-thon Saturday week (10 November) in Sydney. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online before, during and after the meetup. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/November 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 14:05, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

"The Dubbo Liberal and Macquarie Advocate eventually became the Daily Liberal"

Hi - I worked on this a bit yesterday and I don't think this assertion is supported by the references..... certainly something in the power of SLNSW librarians to check. Memorary is that the Daily Liberal started as The Advocate. At this stage I'm not sure. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 19:40, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This claims:
  • Later Title: Daily liberal and Macquarie advocate (Online), 2200-8195
Which seems to be still in operation So I think it's pretty certain to be true. I'll try to formalize it with citations over the weekend, but if you find something, go for it. --99of9 (talk) 21:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Here is some data from http://www.mrl.nsw.gov.au/LocalHeritage/dubbo-timeline Not sure how reliable it is.
  • 1874 “The Dubbo Liberal” commenced print as “The Advertiser” in the Furney building.
  • 1884 "The Liberal” was produced in a shed, which had been part of the Commercial Stores.
  • 1888 The Liberal” transferred it business to the corner of Macquarie and Wingewarra Sts. Later it was transferred to Church Street into a building once used as Blackett’s Mart.
  • 1905 Dubbo Advertiser changed name to Dubbo Liberal.
  • 1958 'Dubbo Liberal’ newspaper changed name to ‘Daily Liberal’.
  • 1979 Daily Liberal moved office to Wheelers Lane.
Trove states "The Dubbo Liberal and Macquarie Advocate (NSW : 1892 - 1927)" which implies the paper started in 1892. The first issue in the digital series is 3 Jan 1894.
Not sure how to interpret all of that. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 22:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, that's interesting, it's always fun when the sources disagree! I'll try to figure it out on the weekend. --99of9 (talk) 08:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This catalogue aggregation is useful. Looks like it has a continuous history back to 1894 at least. --99of9 (talk) 11:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

Hi. Since you gave comments on articles that are currently listed at WP:PR, I was wondering if you could give some helpful comments to Wikipedia:Peer review/Cher/archive1? Thanks, Lordelliott (talk) 20:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

and to you too!

The Instructor's Barnstar
This Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who have performed stellar work in the area of instruction & help for other editors.
For your dedication to the cause of training new editors, and for significant forward planning and followup on WP:GLAM/SLNSW. With gratitude from your co-trainers Wittylama and Whiteghost.ink (talk) 00:50, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. this is what I was talking about re. improving the interactions between users - Echo & Flow. You can sign up for the en.wp newsletter here Wikipedia:Editor engagement/Echo if you want to be kept appraised. Wittylama 00:55, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - much appreciated. --99of9 (talk) 13:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons Greetings

Merry Christmas
Thanks for all your help this year. Whiteghost.ink (talk) 01:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Toby,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Spilosoma canescens caterpillar.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 24, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-12-24. —howcheng {chat} 20:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but since it's already the 24th here, you didn't really give me a lot of notice. I'd appreciate more next time. --99of9 (talk) 22:22, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney meetup invitation: January 2013

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Thursday 10 January 2013. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 08:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

File:AustralianNationalUniversity Radiotelescope.jpg

It's in fact a "paraboloidal dish solar concentrator". :) Bidgee (talk) 10:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks, I tried to search because I wasn't sure, but I had trouble knowing what to search for! --99of9 (talk) 10:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! Saw the dish last time in Canberra and was told what it was, so I can understand how you got it confused (Google isn't much help unless you tell it to search for solar energy, but who would've though it was a solar dish without being told? IMO not many people). Bidgee (talk) 11:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

templates...

As an explanation for this, the rationale is that WP:FAC is a huge page which can take an age to load, hence any templates make it even longer....Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How much longer though? Say I told you that 5000 uses of two such templates (e.g. tick and cross) would add less than 1% to the page load time? Maybe then nobody would care. I don't know the number, but a back of the envelope estimate suggests the total download would be insignificantly altered by also downloading two small images. I guess that the guideline writer was just overcautious without knowing the actual effect. But I'd be happily proved wrong if someone can show me numbers. --99of9 (talk) 13:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(belatedly) I dunno. I've never followed the arguments closely, but some folks feel strongly that significant numbers of templates seem to slow the page down....Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:31, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sportspeople from Sydney

Take a look at the page[1]]. At the moment there are over 400 entries in it. Men and women. If you're going to do gender, this category would obviously be empty. Except the person(Curiously enough the editor has commented at the deletion discussions.) who created sportsmen and sportswomen from Sydney over a year ago stopped doing the task of sorting by gender. Categorizing by sportspeople's location is a tedious job, and I've done it[2]. Want to spend 4-5 hours working on the rest of those Sydney sportspeople? Could take even longer but I'm calculating two a minute and that comes up to 235-240 minutes and 240 is exactly four hours. Not to mention go through People from Sydney(Plus racing drivers from Australia, jockeys from Australia, Kickboxers etc etc) to check for stragglers. It is easy to defend the category, maintaining isn't so easy....William 14:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the kind of job a bot can do. In any case, the size of a job shouldn't prevent Wikipedia from taking it on. --99of9 (talk) 20:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply at my talk page

Hello, 99of9. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added byNorthamerica1000(talk) 01:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Another reply at my talk page

Hello, 99of9. You have new messages at Northamerica1000's talk page.
Message added byNorthamerica1000(talk) 09:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Buff-Banded Rail
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Gallirallus philippensis Lord Howe Island 1.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 00:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Quite impressed that a non-WP Greece/LatAm editor would go running around to find Spanish and Greek sources to save a stub. Good for you. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:43, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. It's quite fun actually. I started when Australia–Uruguay relations got nominated, but that one was easy - I didn't even have to go near Spanish. --99of9 (talk) 10:42, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Isopogon anethifolius

Orlady (talk) 16:03, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Malawi–Malaysia relations

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:05, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IPBE flag removed

Hello, 99of9. Just so you know, I have removed your IP Block Exemption flag, as it appears that it is no longer required. From a check of your recently-used IP addresses, it does not look as though any of those IP addresses are blocked; IPBE is only granted on an as-need basis, and when that need no longer exists, the flag may be removed. If you encounter any difficulty editing as a result of this action, please post an unblock request using the {{unblock|your reason here}} template, mentioning the block message you are seeing. If you have any other questions, or you believe that you do still have a need for the IPBE flag, please let me know. Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:28, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 99of9. You have new messages at Roseclearfield's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Article Feedback deployment

Hey 99of9; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Norman Selfe

Hiya :-)

Don't suppose I could borrow a few minutes of your time to check on the FA nomination I've just made - for Norman Selfe. The first nomination was closed due to lack of comments and I was encouraged to relist it. Specifically there is a question about the copyright status of the Katoomba railway image that I'd like your advice on. Wittylama 10:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow - that was impressive! You have jumped in and responded to the specific thing I was asking you about WHILE I was writing the request! Did you get a premonition that I was going to ask about that? :-) Thank you for your *exceedingly* prompt help - any other thoughts on the FA nomination gratefully received. Wittylama 10:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could you give me advice on one of the points raised in the review by SqueamishOssifage?
He writes: "ISBNs need to follow page numbers, unlike in ref 2 and others." I responded, "I've placed the page numbers outside the 'cite book' template so that when I later use the 'short footnote' template I can specify a different page number (otherwise I'd be writing out the whole reference each time."
I'm sure there's a solution to this but I don't understand the minutiae of footnote templates well enough. Getting all the bits of footnotes to refer to each other nicely is really confusing me! Wittylama 07:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
They're not simple are they? I'll try to get one of them working. --99of9 (talk) 10:05, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not quite sure if I've understood what you wanted, but I've put all the page numbers into the templates (trivial), and then made the short cites link to the first cite instead of the Bibliography (which I then could remove). Is this ok now? The one I couldn't fix was ref#21, because Selfe 1990 doesn't exist since he was long dead by then. --99of9 (talk) 10:40, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Toby. As someone who's commented on the Norman Self nomination, and now that the nomination is nearing the bottom of the FAC list with no new recent comments, I'd like to encourage you to make a statement of support/oppose or add new comments. This is the second time the article has been listed for FA as the first time was closed citing a lack of overt support votes. I'd hate for that to happen again. Sincerely, Wittylama 09:18, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't done a thorough review, I just picked the bits I was interested in. I'll try to make some time for it in the next couple of days. --99of9 (talk) 11:26, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Reeva Steenkamp

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:03, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tumor-associated macrophage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stroma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Purple Swamphen
An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status
Your image, File:Purple Swamp Hen Wollongong.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 10:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Toby,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Floury Baker cicada side.JPG is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 13, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-06-13. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:26, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the nice early notice! Much appreciated. --99of9 (talk) 05:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well you're doing it in a much more timely manner than previous similar notifications I've received, so good job. The caption is good by the way. --99of9 (talk) 11:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination

Cheers for the nomination! :-) We're very appreciative. Is there anything Mcarneyaus and I need to do to do with it? Not sure of the procedure! Hope you have a good weekend. 149.135.146.109 (talk) 07:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC) Sorry, that was me! Forgot I wasn't logged in. Cheers, Rubicon49bce (talk) 08:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to your good faith question

I have answered your good faith question, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive2. — Cirt (talk) 23:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request re FAC

Would it be alright to move the thread involving your initial comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive2 to the FAC subpage's talk page?

I know you said your question was in good faith, but as I stated I had initially became involved in this (and several other bacon-related articles) through participation in the "Bacon WikiCup" (more info at WP:BACON) and I fear that this line of questioning may negatively color the rest of the FAC. I'll go ahead and add a note to my own nomination statement clarifying how I came to work on this particular article.

Would that be alright with you?

Thank you for your time, — Cirt (talk) 00:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have added a clarification to my nom statement. Now, since I've added that to the top of the FAC, would it be alright to move the thread including your comment to the talk page? — Cirt (talk) 00:29, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Sorry for asking in the wrong location, and thanks for your clarifications. --99of9 (talk) 07:12, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much for moving that thread to the FAC talk page, much appreciated! — Cirt (talk) 16:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re Some comments from 99of9

I've replied to all of your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive2.

Thanks very much for your helpful suggestions, I believe the article is much better for it!

Perhaps you could revisit your position at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive2?

Thank you for your time, — Cirt (talk) 22:18, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded there, — Cirt (talk) 23:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I've got the page watchlisted, so you don't need to ping me. --99of9 (talk) 06:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of 1813 crossing of the Blue Mountains

Hello! Your submission of 1813 crossing of the Blue Mountains at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nick-D (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, If you have time, would you mind reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/No. 38 Squadron RAAF? Regards, Nick-D (talk) 10:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments about Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive2

(Thread moved to Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive2#Comments to 99of9 - it's more relevant there, and is on my watchlist.)

Reply

I am hopeful that you will understand that I am doing my best to respond to every single one of your points raised as best I can, in a manner that at the same time does not conflict with other points raised by commenters at this FAC and the prior FAC. Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 19:41, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I realize that. I noticed the conflict over including RRP - if the consensus is to leave it out, I'm fine with that. --99of9 (talk) 19:47, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
RRP? — Cirt (talk) 19:48, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Recommended retail price. --99of9 (talk) 19:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can we move the long thread of your comments to the talk page, as I did my best to address all of the specific points you've raised? — Cirt (talk) 19:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather not. They are part of my review. Some specific questions are not fully addressed (e.g. "what were the total sales?", "was it the first ever bacon only cookbook?"), and it's possible that other reviewers may be able to find additional sources for things like these. I can tick the ones I feel are complete if you want? --99of9 (talk) 19:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please use strikeout to mark those I have addressed? — Cirt (talk) 20:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! And Update: I've responded to your latest point at the FAC, added direct quotation from source, so could you strikeout that one, as well? — Cirt (talk) 20:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Update: Ref link fixed. — Cirt (talk) 20:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. As you can see, I am doing my best to responsively address all points raised as best I can in good faith. :) — Cirt (talk) 20:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Congratulations on your FA. --99of9 (talk) 11:24, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help with research

  1. I see by your strikeout that I have addressed the bulk of the vast majority of your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive2.
  2. I note that so far at least one other commenter has changed to Support based upon my good faith attempts to respond to all of their points raised as best I can.
  3. It appears you only have two remaining points that I have tried my best to address so far, but that you are still unsatisfied with.
  4. Are total sales figures a key factor that hold back book articles for FAC, or that are included in all FA articles about books on Wikipedia?
  5. Perhaps you can help with research, to try to find this info?

Thank you for your time, and for the specific comments, — Cirt (talk) 20:14, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]