User talk:98.231.99.62


September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Emma Morano has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Emma Morano was changed by 98.231.99.62 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863977 on 2016-09-26T14:31:28+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:31, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Morano

You are right that she is currently the 8th oldest person ever, however, that is evident from the article List of the verified oldest people which is linked in Morano's article. As this is dynamic (in a few days she will hopefully be the 7th oldest) there is no need to having to update the Morano article. --Marbe166 (talk) 14:39, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a problem with continuing to update it as time passes. I think we need a more specific account of the data. Is there a formula we can use to make it change as time passes?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan Wheeler (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Wikipedia is not Facebook.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 18:57, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Thomas Henry Huxley— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your draft article, Draft:Nathan Wheeler

Hello, 98.231.99.62. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nathan Wheeler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 17:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]