If you're referring to your edit on a closed AfD, then my interest isn't really relevant. If you want to comment on the discussion you need to put it on the nomination or article talk page, and if you want to challenge the deletion then you need to do so through deletion review. You can't tack a comment on when the discussion is over, regardless of whether or not I'm interested. To address the content of your edit, the subject's notability was not established and that situation has not changed. Gilmour Racing does not receive significant coverage, or coverage of any kind as far as I can tell, quite imply because they are an exceptionally small team competing in an obscure series. Because of that, I'm confident the deletion would be upheld by a deletion review. 5225C (talk • contributions) 13:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've already had the deletion refunded. I'll give you time to update the article as you wish, but I don't see how you'll be able to establish notability which is the main issue here. Furthering that, the last edit you made to the article was on October 22, the day after the AfD started. You didn't make another edit to the article despite the nomination being closed on October 29. You have added only two sources, which still does not constitute significant coverage. Despite your protest that we "ignored" your improvements to the article, you actually didn't take part in the AfD yourself. 5225C (talk • contributions) 13:32, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Because I felt that improving the article was more important and I had faith that those involved in the discussion would keep themselves aware of this. --Falcadore (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
