Hello! I noticed your contributions to Exploding tree and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Barkly Tableland. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Article currently relies on a single source and does not sufficiently demonstrate that the topic is notable enough for an article on its own. I think the better course would be to mention on the main article for the tablelands that they're an IBRA subregion, unless there is sufficient reason for the subregion to be a distinct article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Barkly Tablelands IBRA subregion and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, 49.255.59.94!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Turnagra (talk) 08:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
January 2024
Hello, I'm Johnnie Bob. I noticed that you recently removed content from Albizia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Johnnie Bob (talk) 02:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
49.255.59.94, this is a reply to your response on my talk page (which should have been posted here), included below for completeness.
Three good reason why this material needs to be deleted.
1) Falcataria falcata is not a species of Albizia. It's right there in the article title and species name. Therefore material on that species doesn't belong in the Albizia article.
2) It makes the article a confusing mess to have an entire section talking about a species that is clearly stated, within the article, to have no relationship with the article subject.
3) Wikipedia has a policy that it can not say both A and Not A, even in separate articles. Since it clearly says that F. falcata is in the genus Falcataria, both within the article on that species and within the Albizia article, it can not also say, even by confusing implication, that it is an Albizia.
Yet the article states:
The delimitation of Falcataria and Pithecellobium, close relatives of Albizia, is notoriously complex, with species having been moved between the genera time and again, and this will likely continue. These include Falcataria falcata (the Moluccan albizia, formerly named Albizia moluccana), a common shade tree on tea plantations.
Notwithstanding this, the main reason for my reverting your edit was that you did not adequately explain the reason for your edits in the edit summary. Better yet, you should probably have opened a thread in the article's talk page and sought consensus for the edit.
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Albizia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. The removed material is properly referenced by a scholarly work and is relevant to the article. Please do not remove this material again without first opening a discussion on the article's talk page explaining in detail why you think its removal is justified and why the cited reference is not relevant or inapplicable.Johnnie Bob (talk) 04:09, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, 49.255.59.94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Barkly Tablelands IBRA subregion, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
