User talk:3Oh Hexelon

This user lives with
Type 1 diabetes
This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know.
This user believes that the meaning of life is to live a happy life.




Welcome!

Hello, 3Oh Hexelon! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Devokewater (talk) 09:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Qarah Tabbah and Disputed area

Hi 3Oh Hexelonm, I don't know where are you from and what do you know about the Kurdistan region. But your attempts to remove Kurdish names from the disputed area are against Wikipedia neutrality, not my actions. Both Kurdish and Arabic should be used for the names of places in disputed areas, and this is not only related to ethnicity. About Qarah Tabah, here are two pictures from the town, in which both Arabic and Kurdish are used; 1 & 2. Serchia (talk) 20:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edits as they are clearly POV. I have remained completely neutral whereas you keep adding Kurdish names to areas that are clearly not Kurdish. The town is almost completely Shia Turkmen and multiple sources I have added to the once unsourced article prove that. An article written in Kurdish means nothing as it does not mean the language is used in the town. Use the Kurdish language where the majority is Kurdish. There is already a section on your talk page with a complaint of your POV edits. Your attempts to keep adding Kurdish names and suggest the areas are somehow Kurdish related are clearly POV, and this is further corroborated by your user page.
The government billboard picture is clearly outdated as its article is from September 2017, in which the KRG had held much of the disputed areas. The next month the Iraqi federal government recaptured most of these areas, and Qara Tapa is certainly not part of the KRG. Stop your POV edits. 3Oh Hexelon (talk) 21:48, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem icon One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information.

You copied entire articles verbatim from other sites, which isn't allowed. Instead, please add paraphrased information from those sources into the Wikipedia article as appropriate. ~EdGl talk 03:36, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alqosh

Hi! I saw that you recently added a lot of sources to Alqosh, and now there are 17 sources for one statement in the introduction - this is not really feasible. I would recommend you to avoid Wikipedia:Citation overkill and limit references for a single statment to a couple of Wikipedia:Reliable sources. AntonSamuel (talk) 17:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Apologies for the source overkill, I was quite adamant to prove the statement because it keeps getting removed. Not a problem though, we can change and improve the article as we please. Thanks for the feedback. 3Oh Hexelon (talk) 17:15, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdistan

Hi, there are probably some sources that mention that Kurds see mention it is called one of the 4 parts of Kurdistan, but it is really common sense in the international academic community that Kurdistan has 4 parts and not only by the Kurds. I'd appreciate you'd also read about the topic before just reverting.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for feedback, but my edit is sourced, valid and not controversial. You stating something without a source and removing my sourced statements is not how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia, and especially articles about nations, is based on neutrality and valid information, not POV. We have to remain fair and this is the way forward. 3Oh Hexelon (talk) 22:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
well it is so common sense that we have never before bothered to add it a source.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
'It is common sense so we don't bother adding a source' is not how Wikipedia works. Stop reverting my edits. 3Oh Hexelon (talk) 22:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 23:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from editing

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

3Oh Hexelon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. I understand my mistake and a block is no longer necessary. I didn't understand it was a violation against the rules but it won't happen again. My apologies. I will be focusing on making pages better. 3Oh Hexelon (talk) 08:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 10:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for continuing to abuse multiple accounts (Talkativeness (talk · contribs)) to evade the block on your account. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Sorry but I was already banned. Please prove how Talkativeness is my account because it definitely is not. My IP was temporarily banned from editing Wikipedia, and when Semsûrî is making clear POV edits to pages such as Altun Kupri, even labelling it as a 'Kurdish settlement', other people are going to disagree with that. He also waited until I was banned to tamper with the page, deleted numerous sourced edits I have made. I reverted one edit using my second account and have been banned for a whole week, and someone else edits a page which has been vandalised and I have now been banned for 3 months, all while trying only to make useful contributions. This is not fair. <~~~~}}.

You are very lucky that this is not an indefinite block. If you edit using another account or while logged out while this account is still blocked you will be blocked indefinitely. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:07, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

3Oh Hexelon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry but I was already banned. Please prove how Talkativeness is my account because it definitely is not. My IP was temporarily banned from editing Wikipedia, and when Semsûrî is making clear POV edits to pages such as Altun Kupri, even labelling it as a 'Kurdish settlement', other people are going to disagree with that. He also waited until I was banned to tamper with the page, deleted numerous sourced edits I have made. I reverted one edit using my second account and have been banned for a whole week, and someone else edits a page which has been vandalised and I have now been banned for 3 months, all while trying only to make useful contributions. This is not fair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 3Oh Hexelon (talk • contribs) 09:37, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

 Confirmed based on checkuser evidence to Talkativeness, as already established by Callanecc. Yamla (talk) 13:17, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Apparently trying to make Wikipedia pages neutral and removing vandalism and historical revisionism by Kurdish nationalists is now 'abuse'. 3Oh Hexelon (talk) 20:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not, but your use of multiple accounts is.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If that's how you claim the site works then I have learnt my lesson about a rule I didn't know about. Yet banning me for 3 months while multiple users are going back and vandalising/tampering with pages and I can't contribute is definitely not fair. 3Oh Hexelon (talk) 20:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
How do you not know about a rule that you actively violated while blocked for breaking that specific rule? You were blocked for 1 week for socking using the Kerkükli account and were provided with a very clear explanation of why you were blocked with links to WP:SOCK in both your block log and the block notification on this page, then actively evaded that block using another sock, Talkativeness. Your claim of ignorance of the rules is nonsense.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:51, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't even use that account. Your claims are clearly nonsense. 3Oh Hexelon (talk) 20:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]