User talk:293.xx.xxx.xx/archive05

AfD nomination of Jake Brahm

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Jake Brahm. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Brahm (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaii overprint note

I do not understand your reverting the recent edit of Hawaii overprint note. If you follow the link to the article on Oahu Cemetery, you will see that it was also called "Nuʻuanu" at times. It is on the island of Oʻahu (and that is its official name), but in the Nuʻuanu Valley, so that is what locals call it. Why did you take out the link to the cemetery? And why did you take out the category Category: History of Oahu? Do you contend that it did not take place on that island? And why did you change the link to crematory, which describes the facility used, to crematorium which redirect to cremation describing the funeral process? The article does not refer to burning bodies, but paper money. Did you actually read the changes before reverting? The raw link you added (http://www.nmplimited.com/Index.htm) points to a placeholder page that says "under construction"? The Oahu Cemetery article has a source that appeared in a refereed academic journal. Please reconsider. Aloha. W Nowicki (talk) 22:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you wanted to split the discussion: "The references don't make the distinction."

Yes, because they are the same place, just a "local" name used in the local newspaper by a local, and official name used in the book. Sorry if I am having trouble getting this across? For example, people called the stadium in San Francisco "Candlestick Park" even when its official name was "3Com Park". Locals might know the difference, and a newspaper reporter on a dealine might quote a local's nickname, but an encyclopedia might use the official name. That is why I used the name Oahu Cemetery for the article. Please answer why you removed the link from the overprint note article? Why not tell the truth?
Why do you think the in-line link to an "under construction" page is an encyclopedic quality source?

So if someone does a fact check and notices the discrepancy, how would they know they are one and the same??

If you would have kept the link to the Oahu Cemetery article in, then they could have clicked on that to find out the location of it in Nuʻuanu valley on Nuʻuanu Avenue for starters. Why obscure that fact and mislead readers into thinking there are two different ones? If you really insist a simple "Oahu Cemetery (known by locals as Nuʻuanu Mortuary)" would be less misleading. Someone who really does want to fact check could also then find the Journal article cited for example. Also just found a source in "The Numismatist". So if I corrected the article again, would you back it out and mediation be needed? W Nowicki (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I protest the remvoal of the two youtube links under copyright, it makes no sence, what rule is being broken by having those two links up, there good resorces.

(Also TLC hasn't shown that Special in years, it was a specal, and premeared in 2000, I can't recall it being on much after that(I know I never heard of it, til Youtube) and I watched TLC from about 2002-2004, and youtube was formed in 2005, trust me no one cares, I dumbfounded they made it in the first place. Plus when was it our job to enforce others Copyright, they have the issues, they sould go deal with it.)--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 15:46, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was looking at the worng edit when I cited it. The correct http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1995_Fox_River_Grove_bus%E2%80%93train_collision&diff=next&oldid=238306644 link/edit. How do we know it volotates copyright? Your telling me that TLC has issues. First I've heard of this.--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 15:28, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jan C. Gabriel

Updated DYK query On January 28, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jan C. Gabriel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:01, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Old Laihaina Courthouse?

So you're sure this photo File:Old Laihaina Courthouse.jpg isn't the courthouse?

The Flickr photographer has two photos of this building, both labeled as the courthouse. I've never been there, and suppose you have?

I'll make a note at the photo (or you can), assuming you're certain it's the wrong building. TIA, Pete Tillman (talk) 05:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll correct the photo caption. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 15:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vic Mignogna

You wrote:

Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. It is up to you to fully read this to understand why adding in info needs to be sourced. And also, Living persons can contribute to their biographies, but in certain cases. Asking him directly is not allowed; sources must be from verifiable and stable sources. --293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 6:11 am, Today (UTC−4)

I've only removed one thing (Vampire Knights) - so, assuming that is what you are discussing, the RUMOR that he was in something is far less citable, and was never cited in it's inclusion. So, (1) it's NOT true, (2) it's uncitable (especially since it's not true), and (3) has NEVER been added with ANY citation or reference, much less a valid one. Thus, it will continue to be reverted unless someone provides a valid reference.
Other than that, I've re-added one section that was removed by an anon (the Star Trek Phase 2 stuff), which I also did not write or create, and was cited.
Additionally, you should be aware that the section that was added (which you reverted), was NOT added by me. So, for any changes not related to someone re-adding "Vampire Knights" you may wish to direct your comments at the correct person - which is not me. Please feel free to check the edit history if you want. Thank you.
Best, RobertMfromLI | User Talk 18:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


There is a response here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Vic_Mignogna_fandom_problems
Really, we're in full agreement about the fancruft being added to the article without valid references or reason (notability, etc) - and I think my edit history (everywhere on Wikipedia) proves as much. So... shall we keep arguing about you misunderstanding my intent (and possibly still misunderstanding it) and keep going back and forth over what was probably a simple error when you intentionally or accidentally implied I had anything to do with the uncited additions you reverted? As a related note, I would have (a) done the revert myself, (b) found references, and/or (c) added citation needed tags had I found the addition before you.
Best, RobertMfromLI | User Talk 17:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chee Kung Tong Society Building

Updated DYK query On March 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chee Kung Tong Society Building, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Wailuku Civic Center Historic District

Hello! Your submission of Wailuku Civic Center Historic District at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 22:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Wailuku Civic Center Historic District

Updated DYK query On April 15, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wailuku Civic Center Historic District, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:02, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ka'ahumanu Church

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:12, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Man-Faye

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-Faye (4th nomination)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man-Faye (4th nomination). --Gwern (contribs) 11:15 4 August 2010 (GMT) 11:15, 4 August 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

Sogen Kato

Hey there. I just wanted to thank you for all the work you've done on the article—it's turning out real nice. I nominated the article for DYK a few days ago, but there's a massive backlog so it could be a while until it's up there. Once there are more details as to what exactly went on, do you fancy collaborating to get it to GA? Regards, WackyWace converse | contribs 19:18, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Restaurant Notability

*Note: I am sending this to all participants of the Kebab House deletion discussion

Hello,

I recently opened up a policy change proposal regarding the notability requirements for restaurants here and I would like your input, be it in support or opposition. Thank you - Theornamentalist (talk) 00:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Restaurant Notability

A formalized vote has begun regarding notability and your input is desired, thank you :) - Theornamentalist (talk) 03:56, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TGIAMTHESTIG.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TGIAMTHESTIG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:MastersoftheMaze.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MastersoftheMaze.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Copiapó mining accident

WikiThanks
WikiThanks

Thank You
For the references. What beautifully hand crafted references they are too! Nothing like traditional craftmanship.
(Ask, and it Shall be Given!) - 220.101 talk\Contribs 05:01, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WMMTTitleCard.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WMMTTitleCard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WMMTCards.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WMMTCards.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:45, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Identify this vehicle

I noticed you edited the article for City car and I was wondering if you could identify this vehicle at this link. (link for 4chan removed due to it tripping the spam filter) Thanks. OOODDD (talk) 08:18, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tiger Mask donation phenomenon

Orlady (talk) 06:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

fire engine...

He 293., could you give your thoughts on Talk:Fukushima_I_nuclear_accidents#water_cannon_.28bringing_to_talk_after_.5Bcitation_needed.5D_being_removed? I saw you added info on the fire truck, which I think is relevant, but which as of now is unsourced, so any source or justification why this one was used is welcome! L.tak (talk) 14:05, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Peoples Court Milian & Wapner.PNG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Peoples Court Milian & Wapner.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:09, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RhinoRunnerSaddam.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RhinoRunnerSaddam.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I issue

Hi. I'm glad you brought up the topic of removing watermarks, but I honestly think that AN/I was not the correct place to post your concern. The AN/I page is for incidents that require administrative intervention. Maybe you should take the subject over to WP:MCQ or the Help Desk (although, I already did, if you look at my response). – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 08:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Operation K. Your edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 23:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements? Replacing the map with a photo of FDR High School? Don't be ridiculous. And this is twice for you. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 23:09 & 23:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're free to remove the tag if you disagree with it. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 23:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:AuctionHunterstitlecard.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AuctionHunterstitlecard.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top Gear USA title card.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top Gear USA title card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:04, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:08thMSTeamtitlecard.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:08thMSTeamtitlecard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:04, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Top Gear

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

If you care to have a constructive conversation, I have added a fair amount of information to the discussion topic. roguegeek (talk·cont) 02:04, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TokusouExceedraft.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TokusouExceedraft.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:32, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Hardcore Pawn episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dragster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:BorderWarsTitleCard.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BorderWarsTitleCard.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

  1. Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
  2. Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Columbian expo 1892 obv.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Columbian expo 1892 obv.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Columbian expo 1892 rev.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Columbian expo 1892 rev.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logocrimewatch.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logocrimewatch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Super Hornio Brothers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Generator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
polpoluu~ 00:18, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. When you recently edited Super Hornio Brothers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fucking (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Super Hornio Brothers

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:6000SUX.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:6000SUX.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:20, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dungeon -140 Mephistopheles.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dungeon -140 Mephistopheles.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Burn bag

nice job w Burn bag Decora (talk) 23:54, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About To Be Blocked

I do apologise for my over-editing! And I sincerely apologise for getting into an 'edit war'. It was certainly not my intention to cause offence. I just like to see, when titles are used, that they are used correctly. And, in the case of the London 2012 opening ceremony, I think it is very unfair, and completely inaccurate, to refer to the ceremony's music as 'British' as much of that music came from Ireland (such as U2, Snow Patrol, etc.). If I have caused offence, I apologise. I do hope that 'the powers that be' (to use a British Protestant term!) do not block me! Laggan Boy (talk) 23:18, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User talk:IanB2#August2012

Hello, 293.xx.xxx.xx. You have new messages at IanB2's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Olympics on NBC, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Department of Defense and Stars and Stripes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hardcore Pawn episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burmese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FDC Honolulu

I made some changes to the Federal Detention Center, Honolulu article and you reversed them. It's my fault because I didn't propose them beforehand, sorry about that. Can I reinstate those changes? I will not remove any information, just put it in a more "reader-friendly" format. MDEVER802 (talk) 23:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk back

Hello, 293.xx.xxx.xx. You have new messages at Sport and politics's talk page.
Message added User:Sport and politics. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tape Delays

I prefer to keep all discussions in one place. The reason is doesn't warren inclusion on this page is for three reasons. The decisions were not under the control of the Olympics organisers. They were an operational matter for the Media Broadcaster. Secondly just because people complained about this issue doesn't make it a controversy. Many people complained regarding many things which are not included in the article and many people complain about many things every day they do not all of a sudden become controversies. The final thing is the nature of the centricness it is covering TV viewing and it only cover three "western" nations. i do not see a section here on the Countries which did not broadcast the opening ceremony at all, the piece has to be balanced and wide covering other wise is it cherry-picking. I am not saying that the complaints weren't justified or that the complainers were right or wrong or that the media broadcasters were right or wrong. It is though just complaints about the operational issues of some media outlets. If the coverage had lead or does lead to media rights being revoked or awarded to another outlet then that is a controversy as it would be the Olympic organisers saying to a media outlet "your coverage was so poor we are not going to let you have the rights to broadcast". That is not the case in this situation. --Sport and politics (talk) 08:36, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning

It is not reverting when new material is being added and the interpretation that "any three edits" constitute a violation is pure rubbish. Please retract the unfounded and nonsensical warning on my talk page. That is like saying a page with a 1RR is unable to be edited by anyone as one edit would violate the 1 revet rule. Please employ some common sense when making judgements on these subjects. it is not "revert warring" if new material is being added. those interpretations get in the way of a well functioning encyclopaedia and are disruptive. Under that interpretation no new article would ever be written as two editors making changes or one editor making lots of changes would be "revert warring". Sport and politics (talk) 08:46, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BorderWarsTitleCard.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:BorderWarsTitleCard.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:27, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]