User talk:23.251.65.195

December 2021

Hello, I'm SpinningCeres. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Asian Doll, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SpinningCeres (talk) 00:35, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that in this edit to Betty Ford, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 22:41, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Betty Ford. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 22:45, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a registered user account, so this may not apply to everyone who uses it. But your recent edit summary complains that you're being warned about disruptive editing. You are adding content (captions, etc.) that are not supported by any external reference. The captions on those photos reflect the information given by their sources (Library of Congress, LBJ Library). Your edits will continue to be reverted as long as they don't conform to Wikipedia's policies. Please read some of the links above to learn more about Wikipedia. - Special-T (talk) 14:47, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - Special-T (talk) 23:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. - Special-T (talk) 23:36, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators’ noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wallnot (talk) 22:44, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

continuing persistent addition of uncited material

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Judy Agnew. - Special-T (talk) 17:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Carmena Seoul per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Carmena Seoul. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 17:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Andre Rush have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 02:32, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]