User talk:22WHERO

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, 22WHERO! Thank you for your contributions. I am CambridgeBayWeather and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 21:26, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:CFB North Bay, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs email 15:20, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 22WHERO. You have new messages at Hohum's talk page.
Message added 15:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hohum (talk) 15:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CFB North Bay

Just need to clarify a couple of things. You use "we" in your remarks. Does this mean that more than one person is editing from this account? If so the others need to have their own account as per Wikipedia:Username policy#Sharing accounts. Images might be a problem. If the images you add are all taken by you as one person then there is no problem uploading them at Commons. By the way if you log in here and then go to Commons you should be logged in to this account there. If you haven't taken all the pictures yourself then it's a little more awkward. You would then would need to go through the Open-source Ticket Request System and give permission to use the images. The same would apply if you uploaded the images here but on Commons they would be available to other language Wikipedias to use. I'm curious, does the IFSS CZNB share some of the facility? If so that should probably get a mention. Thanks for all the hard work on the article. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 17:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That sounds fine as long as it's just you behind the account then there's no problem. If you do use something from the newspaper or the museum then the permission should be sent to the email at the OTRS. By the way I talk to the guys at Arctic Radio almost daily passing arrivals and departures. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 21:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from user page.

Hi there! I have just started contributing photo's and info on Wiki and ran into Cambayweather who had contacted my on my Panoramio site! Quite a small world as I have been adding photo's of my arctic tours while conducting work for Transport Canada. I'm also an old Dewliner of 9 years and saw some of your talk with cambaywx so I thought I'd say hello. I will be adding photo's of pretty much the entire arctic but being an ex Dewliner I like to add photo's of the old sites or what's left of them. I also have lots of photo's of the Deifenbunker which I toured just recently. Fond memories came back to me of the old teletype machines, ticker tape machines etc. I'm wondering if you know of any wiki postings that post with the Dewline? Have a great day and hope to hear from you. TimKal Timkal (talk) 02:46, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq video

Thanks for your response. The article came up for deletion and was losing badly so I moved it back to my user space. Two felt it wasn't very notable and the delete votes just snow-balled for various other bad reasons. I still don't understand this as google searches turn up lots of hits referring to the press conference. I have emailed the US navy historical dept. and other sites but not received any response. Canadian bases could try a request for a copy for training purposes etc. I may email Cold Lake near me. I think it has great historical importance. It may be the first time a guided weapon video was widely shown to the public. The article is now at User:Canoe1967/The luckiest man in Iraq 2 if you wish to see it.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:35, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to CFB North Bay may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:37, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CFB North Bay

Good day. I added the original research, primary sources and refimprove notices on CFB North Bay, which you promptly removed without providing an edit summary or contributing to the talk page. I am restoring the notices in the hope that you can discuss the state of the article. Thanks :) pm (talk) 14:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

22WHERO, I posted a question for you on the CFB North Bay talk page (last section). Would you please read and respond? Thanks! Ravensfire (talk) 17:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please don't just blindly revert good faith edits that are trying to improve the article. Beyond the annoyance it might cause the other editor, doing so repeatedly can lead to concerns about you trying to take ownership of the article. It's understandable as you've obviously put a great deal of effort into the article and that's appreciated. But you cannot be the sole "gatekeeper" of an article, accepting only your edits and dismissing others. Wikipedia doesn't work that way. Editing here requires you to work with others in good faith, to developer the best possible article following the Wikipedia policies. Everyone has different styles and their outside view can offer improvements or suggestions that are difficult for you to see because you've done so much of the work on the article. You need to work with the other editors, using the talk page to discuss edits or concerns.

The edit cycle is supposed to go Bold, Revert, Discuss, or simply BRD. Someone is Bold and makes an edit. Another editor Reverts the edit, hopefully with a edit summary on why. Finally, a discussion happens about the change on the article talk page. I'm starting that discussion about the lead shortly to hopefully work towards something that improves the article and everyone can accept. I ask you to participate in that discussion, and others that may be raised. Try to understand the concerns others are raising and work with them to alleviate those concerns through discussion or edits. Ravensfire (talk) 17:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. Please participate in the current discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Move to the Base's website

It appears that you may be an employee of the base. You should consider posting all or most of this article at the base's website. As written, it is not particularly compliant with Wikipedia guidelines and is likely to be heavily and substantially edited. Just a suggestion. Capitalismojo (talk) 22:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CFB North Bay

Hi 22WHERO (talk) Thank you for your message, but one caution is that personal information should not be left "in the clear", as you never know ... A safer means of contact is through email, but I do appreciate the contact and will keep the article in my watchlist and you can count on me for any assistance in content, formatting or line editing. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:56, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to North Bay, Ontario, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 15:26, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When you can site a reliable, published source, feel free to re-add the content. Everything on Wikipedia must conform to our core policy, WP:V. The source need not be on the internet, but you must cite it completely enough that a reasonable person could locate the exact place your information came from and verify it for themselves if they so choose. If your info comes from a magazine or a journal or a newspaper, the cite must include the publication date, the name of the publication, the author, the page number and the title of the article. If it comes from a book, it must include the publisher, the author, the edition, the page number, the title and the ISBN. If it comes from the internet, first beware, because most online sources are not reliable. Second, it must include the website name, the URL, the author, the title, and the date accessed. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, when you go to add them to the edit, there are nifty little templates to help available in pull down menus on the edit window. Click "Cite" at the top and a box will appear that says "Templates". Click it and it will give you specialized templates for journals, newspapers, books and web. The book one is really cool because if you add the ISBN number first, it will automatically fill in most of the blanks for you. John from Idegon (talk) 17:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:OFFICIAL BADGE OF 22 WING CANADIAN ARMED FORCES.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:OFFICIAL BADGE OF 22 WING CANADIAN ARMED FORCES.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:OFFICIAL BADGE CANADIAN FORCES BASE NORTH BAY.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:OFFICIAL BADGE CANADIAN FORCES BASE NORTH BAY.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:NOW UNCLASSIFIED SECRET PLAN FOR BOMARC SITE DEPLOYMENT IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES.tif

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NOW UNCLASSIFIED SECRET PLAN FOR BOMARC SITE DEPLOYMENT IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES.tif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:CANADIAN AIR DEFENCE SECTOR AT NORTH BAY TRACKING SANTA.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CANADIAN AIR DEFENCE SECTOR AT NORTH BAY TRACKING SANTA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Canadian CF-18 interceptor and Russian Tupolev TU-95 "Bear" bomber.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Canadian CF-18 interceptor and Russian Tupolev TU-95 "Bear" bomber.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 22WHERO. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 14:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 14:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, 22WHERO. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 15:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:11, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CIM-10 Bomarc

Hello. I just mentioned the title on missile CIM-10 Bomarc. It will change the name thereon. L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 18:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 22WHERO. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:1920 CANADIAN GOVERNMENT F.3 AT SAULT STE MARIE AFTERING PASSING OVER NORTH BAY.tif

Thank you for uploading File:1920 CANADIAN GOVERNMENT F.3 AT SAULT STE MARIE AFTERING PASSING OVER NORTH BAY.tif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

License tagging for File:NOW UNCLASSIFIED SECRET PLAN FOR BOMARC SITE DEPLOYMENT IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NOW UNCLASSIFIED SECRET PLAN FOR BOMARC SITE DEPLOYMENT IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:31, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:NORAD TRACKS SANTA, AT NORTH BAY, 2009.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NORAD TRACKS SANTA, AT NORTH BAY, 2009.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CANADIAN FORCES CF-18 FIGHTER INTERCEPTING RUSSIAN TUPOLEV TU-95 "BEAR" BOMBER OFF THE CANADIAN COAST 5 SEPTEMBER 2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CANADIAN FORCES CF-18 FIGHTER INTERCEPTING RUSSIAN TUPOLEV TU-95 "BEAR" BOMBER OFF THE CANADIAN COAST 5 SEPTEMBER 2007.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:31, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:22 WING BADGE.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:22 WING BADGE.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:CANADIAN FORCES BASE NORTH BAY BADGE.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CANADIAN FORCES BASE NORTH BAY BADGE.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:NOW UNCLASSIFIED SECRET PLAN FOR BOMARC SITE DEPLOYMENT IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:NOW UNCLASSIFIED SECRET PLAN FOR BOMARC SITE DEPLOYMENT IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:NOW UNCLASSIFIED SECRET PLAN FOR BOMARC SITE DEPLOYMENT IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:NOW UNCLASSIFIED SECRET PLAN FOR BOMARC SITE DEPLOYMENT IN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000Bot (talk) 00:05, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:CANADIAN FORCES BASE NORTH BAY BADGE.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CANADIAN FORCES BASE NORTH BAY BADGE.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000Bot (talk) 00:05, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:22 WING BADGE.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:22 WING BADGE.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000Bot (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:CANADIAN FORCES CF-18 FIGHTER INTERCEPTING RUSSIAN TUPOLEV TU-95 "BEAR" BOMBER OFF THE CANADIAN COAST 5 SEPTEMBER 2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CANADIAN FORCES CF-18 FIGHTER INTERCEPTING RUSSIAN TUPOLEV TU-95 "BEAR" BOMBER OFF THE CANADIAN COAST 5 SEPTEMBER 2007.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000Bot (talk) 00:06, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:NORAD TRACKS SANTA, AT NORTH BAY, 2009.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:NORAD TRACKS SANTA, AT NORTH BAY, 2009.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [e-mail], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [e-mail].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000Bot (talk) 00:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 22WHERO. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:26, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]