Could you properly format your references using Template:Cite web? Also your links are redirects. You should just use the address of the page, not the address of the redirect. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 22:01, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I will do that, but could you also tolerate other people opinion? Please stop remove materials especially sourced ones, if you like we can talk and reach an agreement.
Thank you..
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I invite you to respond to Talk:Type 093 submarine, Talk:Type 054A frigate, and Talk:CJ-10 (missile) with whatever additional comments you may have.
After that, given our history of clashes, I invite you to join me in seeking a Third Opinion, as available through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process. What say you? - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 00:36, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I second that, I'll open a discussion on the Type 99 tank talk page as well. Rather than impulsively addition suspect sources, please discuss the changes you would like to bring and take note of previous consensuses on talk pages. I'm especially referring to the WZ-10 attack helicopter page where you've been removed reliable sources regarding the designer of the helicopter. Khazar (talk) 22:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your editing and interactions with RovingPersonalityConstruct. The thread is Disruptive_editing_and_advocacy_by_2602:306:b8bf:c0:a17b:1dc4:f754:7974.2F199.116.169.39.2F199.116.175.123. Thank you. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 03:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Type 99 tank, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Khazar (talk) 22:56, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at John C. Bogle. - FlightTime Public (open channel) 16:59, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- 199.116.175.123 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) Just wanted to let you know that you were in the right here. Sorry for the confusion. Airplaneman ✈ 19:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
