Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!
Your IP address, 185.58.164.47, is registered to Scottish Common Services Agency (UK-SWAN academic/research network) and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.
If you are unable to create an account due to your institution's IP address being blocked, follow these instructions. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator or instructor and request that your school contact Wikimedia'sXFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.
Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using {{School block}}.
In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Educational institution staff and network administrators wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Hello, I'm A09090091. I noticed that in this edit to Elsie Fisher, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. A09090091 (talk) 13:09, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I attended this school. I therefore know more about it than you do. Why shouldn't I use information I know about. I suggest that you consult your psychologist. 185.58.164.47 (talk) 10:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also read: Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism. For example, edit warring over how exactly to present encyclopedic content is not vandalism. Careful consideration may be required to differentiate between edits that are beneficial, edits that are detrimental but well-intentioned, and edits that are vandalism. If it is clear that an editor is intending to improve Wikipedia, their edits are not vandalism, even if they violate some core policy of Wikipedia. Mislabeling good-faith edits "vandalism" can be harmful, as it makes users less likely to respond to corrective advice or to engage collaboratively during a disagreement. For that reason, avoid using the term "vandalism" unless it is clear the user means to harm Wikipedia; this is even true when warning a user with a user warning template. Choose the template that most closely matches the behavior you are trying to correct. 185.58.164.47 (talk) 10:13, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Notable alumni" sections should only contain people who already have Wikipedia articles or who will shortly get them. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Le Marteau. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Anthony Kiedis, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Le Marteau (talk) 10:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Worth noting the Nir Bitton edit, looks like an unreferenced fact, which was true, I suspect by someone who doesn't understand how to use citations. I'm not sure we can call that vandalism really. 185.58.164.47 (talk) 19:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sixteen Candles. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
