thank you for your reply, but can you try to understand the context of the article, like i already have said before, pederasty is a heinous sex crime and no love is involve and the word 'romantic' and 'couples' is just plain stupid and disgusting and does not add up to it at all, try discussing this with the other editors and the administration editors, again no good faith edits and nothing wrong and harmful about it okay. thank you and good luck :) 112.202.60.98 (talk) 06:53, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
October 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pederasty. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Not only are there obvious grammar errors in your edits, like incorrect capitalization, but the content of your edits has been challenged as not representative of what the cited sources say. You must get consensus at the respective articles' talk pages before attempting to make these changes. —C.Fred (talk) 03:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for acknowledging that you are edit warring. I trust this means you will discuss the edits at the relevant talk pages and not revert any further. —C.Fred (talk) 04:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Late message: Hello once again C.Fred if you are reading this, i am sorry if i have make any unintentional flaws and i again did not start the edit wars fist but the other wikipedia user did it, but again maybe the edits i created were typos, once this is over, can i edit it more properly this time and i myself and everyone involved all generally have an obvious consensus on these various situations were alright, and i know all the reliable sources and links about it and no bodied article changes on it, and i truly have made already the talk pages on the ancient greek pederasty main article's with two pages before on it except for the and also thank you for your service and good luck and i will try editing without any typo errors. :) 112.202.60.98 (talk) 05:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Late message 2: Hello C.Fred if you are reading this, i am sorry if i have make any unintentional flaws and i again did not start the edit wars fist but the other wikipedia user did it, but again maybe the edits i created were typos, once this is over, can i edit it more properly this time and i myself and everyone involved all generally have an obvious consensus on these various situations were alright, and i know all the reliable sources and links about it and no bodied article changes on it, and i truly have made already the talk pages on the pederasty in ancient greece main article's page with two messages before on it except for the main pederasty one and also thank you for your service and good luck and i will try editing without any typo errors. :) 112.202.60.98 (talk) 05:50, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Posting to the talk page is not the same as getting consensus. Once your block expires, you need to discuss the potential changes on the talk page. If there is a consensus to make the changes, then let one of the other editors who agrees with you make the changes. —C.Fred (talk) 12:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
