User talk:103.225.23.94

July 2022

Hello, I'm LichF. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lysychansk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LichF (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how is that not constructive? the city is part of LPR, was under Ukrainian occupation from 2014 and now is liberated by LPR fighters backed by Russia. 103.225.23.94 (talk) 08:57, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is accurate to say it is "occupied" by Russia since it is widely considered to be Ukrainian territory, but it is currently controlled by the Russian military and Russian-backed forces. Saying it was "liberated" is not neutral ("captured" is significantly more neutral), and Wikipedia should be written from a neutral point of view. LichF (talk) 09:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

then keep the word controlled as many of LPR fighters are actually locals and now re-united with their families. ukraine army has no business being there. 103.225.23.94 (talk) 09:05, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this on Talk:Lysychansk (the most recent post (bottom) is about this very dispute). LichF (talk) 09:27, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lysychansk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LichF (talk) 08:58, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Kleinpecan (talk) 04:59, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alex Bakharev (talk) 05:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Luhansk, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. DoebLoggs (talk) 07:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent unconstructive editing, including edit-warring, editing to promote a point of view, refusal to edit collaboratively, and personally attacking another editor. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  JBW (talk) 11:28, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Z-Library. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 💜  melecie  talk - 09:44, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2023

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Sea of Azov, you may be blocked from editing. AntientNestor (talk) 07:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Sea of Azov. AntientNestor (talk) 08:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.