User talk:Товболатов/ArchiveWikiEditor1234567123Товболатов Can you explain to me why do you make false accusations of me? You're saying I do Sockpuppetry, that I steal Chechen history even though I explained to you that our history is shared (Durdzuks are ancestors of both Chechens and Ingushes). If you are muslim then you should know that false accusing is not permissible in Islam. Tell me where did I steal chechen history? Last time I asked, you stopped answering me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEditor1234567123 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC) Welcome!Hello, Товболатов, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 22:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for November 8Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murtazeki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Border Troops. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC) На русском статья будет? --Simba16 (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2022 (UTC) Ханкальское сражение (1807) - Simba16 I already have the author in Russian)).--Товболатов (talk) 08:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC) Simba16 вы находитесь в английской википедии пишите на английском))) --Товболатов (talk) 08:54, 20 November 2022 (UTC) Simba16 позже штурм Герменчука добавлю.--Товболатов (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC) No ground chargesI suggest you don't blame me for what I didn't do. You slandered me in the Russian Wikipedia, although you yourself are a virtual who, under the Russian Wikipedia account, will introduce a war of edits and vandalism in Ingush articles. However, to avoid an edit war, I won't edit "Chechens" for the time being, and you too will refrain from vandalizing the Russian Wikipedia. Niyskho (talk) 15:47, 7 December 2022 (UTC) December 2022Your recent editing history at Ingush people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:39, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
SarekOfVulcan (talk) saw sorry Товболатов (talk) 17:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC) SarekOfVulcan (talk) Pay attention, he continued to break the rules despite your warning.Товболатов (talk) 17:53, 15 December 2022 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Magomed Shataev has been accepted Magomed Shataev, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! Ymblanter (talk) 07:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Happy New Year, Товболатов!Товболатов, Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages. Abishe (talk) 17:58, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested: Nazran conflictHello Товболатов. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Nazran conflict, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. BangJan1999 20:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC) BangJan1999 You know that deleting a template has a consequence?? --Товболатов (talk) 20:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC) BangJan1999 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dzurdzuketi You see that the administrators are checking there.--Товболатов (talk) 21:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC) Speedy deletion contested: AdermakhHello Товболатов. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Adermakh, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: You don't have to be an admin to know that speedy deletion only covers very specific criteria of which "minimal research" is not one of them. Also, if someone contests a speedy deletion, don't re-add it, instead use other methods of deletion like Proposed Deletion or Articles for Deletion. Thank you. BangJan1999 21:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC) BangJan1999 Hello, yes I have corrected it. See the discussion pages of these articles for this fake.--Товболатов (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: Creating The Grozny oil region (January 11) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Restoration of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR (January 11) Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, Товболатов. Thank you for your work on Chechen lighthouse. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC) January 2023You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nazran conflict. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Vieta (dishA tag has been placed on Vieta (dish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC) Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanctionThe following sanction now applies to you:
You have been sanctioned for tendentious editing across multiple articles, particularly this editing spree on February 16 (Special:Diff/1139722862, Special:Diff/1139722968, Special:Diff/1139723019, Special:Diff/1139723084, Special:Diff/1139723110, Special:Diff/1139723167, Special:Diff/1139723254, Special:Diff/1139723211). This comes after several days of warnings for borderline edit warring, insults, and frivolous demands for administrator intervention. It is important to note that it is not your position on Chechen-Ingush identity that led to this sanction, but specifically your method in pursuing your desired changes to articles. Spamming the same text across a half dozen pages that you know are subject to an ongoing dispute with another editor is incompatible with a constructive editing environment. This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. signed, Rosguill talk 15:56, 17 February 2023 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Restoration of the Chechen-Ingush ASSRHello, Товболатов. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Restoration of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Creating The Grozny oil regionHello, Товболатов. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Creating The Grozny oil region, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Lighthouse of Lierna for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lighthouse of Lierna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lighthouse of Lierna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Restoration of the Chechen-Ingush ASSRHello, Товболатов. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Restoration of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC) Your draft article, Draft:Creating The Grozny oil regionHello, Товболатов. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Creating The Grozny oil region". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Alan Fearnley for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Fearnley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Fearnley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Oaktree b (talk) 16:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC) Discussion on two articles you createdGood day. I see that you have not been notified of this discussion: WT:WikiProject_Ships#Two_poor_quality_articles. The concerns there are that the content duplicates existing articles, and the writing is not idiomatic English. Feel free to participate in the discussion. Kablammo (talk) 12:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Tea race (competitions) for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tea race (competitions) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tea race (competitions) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 19:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Race Cutty Sark and Thermopylae for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Race Cutty Sark and Thermopylae is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race Cutty Sark and Thermopylae until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 19:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC) SorryI just thought I should add a note of apology that your editing efforts have met with a total of three articles proposed for deletion – two of them put forward by me. Sometimes the processes of Wikipedia can appear horribly unkind and I think this is one of them. Please do not be disheartened. If you have made the effort to get this far, I am sure you can continue to play a part in the Wikipedia project. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 19:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC) ThoughtIdRetired Thanks for your apology, I understand.--Товболатов (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2023 (UTC) Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from nl.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 13:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC) Ancestral towerHello Товболатов Can you provide the coordinates for Курчалоевской башни ? Thanks. Kablammo (talk) 18:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Barnstar!
Casa AtellaniIf this was translated from another language, do you think you could complete the template to identify which language/article you used as a source? Thanks - I've reviewed it for now... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you startedHello, Товболатов. Thank you for your work on Bicocca degli Arcimboldi. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC) SunDawn hi, good to see you again. Thank you for the nice wishes. You have previously viewed and thanked me for this article Chechen lighthouse. You could check it, otherwise it still weighs unrecognised, you can put the start.--Товболатов (talk) 16:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC) Palazzo Donati (gia Albergoni, Vimercati) moved to draftspaceThanks for your contributions to Palazzo Donati (gia Albergoni, Vimercati). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while. Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
AE appealHi, I'm sorry to tell you that your appeal of your topic ban has been declined. Reviewing administrators were concerned that you aren't able to communicate clearly in English or follow Wikipedia norms. While not your fault, this is nonetheless a major problem when making controversial edits in contentious areas. Administrators also felt that you had not explained why the topic ban was no longer necessary or how you would avoid problems if it was lifted. With apologies, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Palazzo Donati (gia Albergoni, Vimercati) has been accepted Palazzo Donati (gia Albergoni, Vimercati), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .Thanks again, and happy editing! Alexandermcnabb (talk) 03:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)ВопросАссаламу алейкум ва рахматтулахи ва баракатух @Товболатов. У тебя случайно нету доступа к Национальной электронной библиотеке ЧР? Это единственная библиотека в интернете (по крайней мере, я эту книгу только там нашёл), которая имеет при себе ценный труд[a] про ингушского революционера Гапура Ахриева, и мне как раз нужен этот труд для создания статьи про Гапура. С уважением, WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 10:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC). Notes
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add February 2024To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violation of your topic ban
from editing content related to ethnic minority groups in the former Soviet Union, broadly construedon the page Artur Beterbiev, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 31 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Товболатов (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Please copy my appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard or administrators' noticeboard. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. A year has passed since I was blocked on the topic of the former Soviet Union. I did not violate any actions. I consider the blocking to be unfounded; I edited the Canadian Citizen page. They should have warned me first, and not immediately blocked me. WikiEditor1234567123 Why is this man stalking me? 1, 2 At his request, I was banned from the topic on the USSR, now a year later, he again makes a complaint against me. Although I didn't communicate with him. This is a separate topic, he did not participate in the discussion. Here you can clearly see they want to block me forever as an unwanted user for him. Товболатов (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC) Decline reason: There's no way to believably claim that "content related to ethnic minority groups in the former Soviet Union, broadly construed" does not include a person's identity as a Chechen, regardless of that person's citizenship. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 00:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. |