Trithuria inconspicua

Trithuria inconspicua
Trithuria inconspicua growing in fine silica sand

Nationally Critical (NZ TCS)[1]
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Order: Nymphaeales
Family: Hydatellaceae
Genus: Trithuria
Species:
T. inconspicua
Binomial name
Trithuria inconspicua
Subspecies[3]
Distribution of Trithuria inconspicua
Synonyms[3]

Hydatella inconspicua (Cheeseman) Cheeseman

Trithuria inconspicua is a small aquatic herb of the family Hydatellaceae that is only found in New Zealand.[4][5]

Description

T. inconspicua partially buried under sediment. Photo by Jeremy Rolfe

Vegetative characteristics

Trithuria inconspicua is a small, 15–55 mm tall, aquatic,[1] perennial,[1][5] rhizomatous[1][6] herb with adventitious roots and glabrous,[1] linear-filiform,[7] 15–55 mm long, and 0.25–0.4 mm wide leaves.[1] The rhizome is up to 2 cm long, and up to 3 mm wide.[6]

Generative characteristics

It can be seen as either a monoicous, or in part as an exclusively female species. It can possess either bisexual, or unisexual reproductive units ("flowers").[5] Female plants are more frequent, although male and bisexual individuals also occur.[7][6] The male flowers consist of bright red 10 mm long filaments, whilst the female flowers are yellow-brown and contain 5-10 styles bunched at the apex.[1]

Cytology

The chloroplast genome is 165389 bp long.[8]

Taxonomy

It was published by Thomas Frederic Cheeseman in 1906.[2][3] The lectotype specimen was collected by H. Carse in Lake Ngatu, New Zealand on the 1st of January 1902.[5] It is placed in Trithuria sect. Hydatella.[9]
It is divided into two subspecies, namely the autonymous subspecies Trithuria inconspicua subsp. inconspicua, which is found in coastal dune lakes in the North of North Island, New Zealand, and Trithuria inconspicua subsp. brevistyla K.A.Ford described in 2019, which is found in glacial lakes in the South of South Island, New Zealand.[7]

Etymology

The specific epithet inconspicua means inconspicous, not easily visible.[1][10]

The first flowering plant?

Based on molecular data from a single plastid gene (rbcL)T. inconspicua was originally believed to a monocot.[11] However, a more recent study using multiple genetic loci, supported by a subsequent re-evaluation of morphological characteristics, now places T. inconspicua as a sister group with the water lilies (Nymphaeales).[12] This new placement of T. inconspicua means only a single lineage of flowering plant is thought to be older, that being the woody New Caledonian shrub Amborella trichopoda.[13]

The predominant view that Amborella represents the oldest flowering plant was recently challenged in a study by Goremykini et al (2013),[14] who showed that when highly variable sites were removed from the dataset, T. inconspicua was consistently identified as the oldest angiosperm lineage. This proposal has attracted criticism from Drew et al (2014), who argued that the basal placement of T. inconspicua is an artifact of the variable site filtering method used by Goremykini et al (2013).[15] One of the main reasons why people are interested in this question is that placing T. inconspicua at the base of the angiosperm lineage would suggest the first angiosperms were soft bodied aquatic plants, rather than a woody terrestrial plants like Amborella. These competing theories have been given the light hearted monikers "wet and wild" and "dark and disturbed".[15][16][17]

Conservation status

Trithuria inconspicua is seriously threatened[1] due to the competition by the introduced bladder wort (Utricularia gibba) as well as other fresh water weeds.

Ecology

It occurs in coastal dune lakes and glacial lakes[7] in shallow to 5–7 m deep waters. It grows in mud, sand, and gravel substrates.[1] The plants are often partly buried within the substrate.[7][1]

Cultural significance

It has been chosen to be the New Zealand's Favourite Plant 2024.[18][19]

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k de Lange, P.J. (2024): Trithuria inconspicua Fact Sheet (content continuously updated). New Zealand Plant Conservation Network. https://www.nzpcn.org.nz/flora/species/trithuria-inconspicua/ (2024-11-13)
  2. ^ a b Cheeseman, T. F. (1906), Manual of the New Zealand Flora, New Zealand Government, p. 756, OCLC 688378960, Wikidata Q5992016
  3. ^ a b c "Trithuria inconspicua Cheeseman". Plants of the World Online. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
  4. ^ Kew World Checklist of Selected Plant Families
  5. ^ a b c d Dmitry D. Sokoloff, Margarita V. Remizowa, Terry D. Macfarlane, and Paula J. Rudall. 2008. "Classification of the early-divergent angiosperm family Hydatellaceae: one genus instead of two, four new species and sexual dimorphism in dioecious taxa". Taxon 57(1):179-200.
  6. ^ a b c Pledge, David H. 1974. "Some Observations on Hydatella Inconspicua (Cheesem.) Cheesem. (Centrolepidaceae)." New Zealand Journal of Botany 12 (4): 559–61.
  7. ^ a b c d e Smissen, R. D., Ford, K. A., Champion, P. D., & Heenan, P. B. (2019). Genetic variation in Trithuria inconspicua and T. filamentosa (Hydatellaceae): a new subspecies and a hypothesis of apomixis arising within a predominantly selfing lineage. Australian Systematic Botany, 32(1), 1-11.
  8. ^ Gruenstaeudl, M., Nauheimer, L., & Borsch, T. (2017). Plastid genome structure and phylogenomics of Nymphaeales: conserved gene order and new insights into relationships. Plant systematics and evolution, 303, 1251-1270.
  9. ^ Iles, W. J., Rudall, P. J., Sokoloff, D. D., Remizowa, M. V., Macfarlane, T. D., Logacheva, M. D., & Graham, S. W. (2012). Molecular phylogenetics of Hydatellaceae (Nymphaeales): Sexual‐system homoplasy and a new sectional classification. American Journal of Botany, 99(4), 663-676.
  10. ^ Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research. (n.d.-a). Trithuria inconspicua Cheeseman. Biota of New Zealand. Retrieved November 13, 2024, from https://biotanz.landcareresearch.co.nz/scientific-names/bb52b280-93f6-45d3-b434-ea6c4081e712
  11. ^ Michelangeli, Fabian A., Jerrold I. Davis, and Dennis Wm Stevenson. 2003. "Phylogenetic Relationships among Poaceae and Related Families as Inferred from Morphology, Inversions in the Plastid Genome, and Sequence Data from the Mitochondrial and Plastid Genomes." American Journal of Botany 90 (1): 93–106.
  12. ^ Saarela, Jeffery M., Hardeep S. Rai, James A. Doyle, Peter K. Endress, Sarah Mathews, Adam D. Marchant, Barbara G. Briggs, and Sean W. Graham. 2007. "Hydatellaceae Identified as a New Branch near the Base of the Angiosperm Phylogenetic Tree." Nature 446 (7133): 312–15.
  13. ^ Friis, Else Marie, and Peter Crane. 2007. "Botany: New Home for Tiny Aquatics." Nature 446 (7133): 269–70.
  14. ^ Goremykini, V.V.; Nikiforova, S.V.; Biggs, P.J.; Zhong, B. de Lange, P.; Martin, W.; Woetzel, S.; Atherton, R.A., McLenachan, T.; Lockhart, P.J. 2013: The evolutionary root of flowering plants. Systematic Biology 61 (1) 50–61.
  15. ^ a b Drew, Bryan T., Brad R. Ruhfel, Stephen A. Smith, Michael J. Moore, Barbara G. Briggs, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Pamela S. Soltis, and Douglas E. Soltis. 2014. "Another Look at the Root of the Angiosperms Reveals a Familiar Tale." Systematic Biology 63 (3): 368–82.
  16. ^ Feild, Taylor S., Nan Crystal Arens, James A. Doyle, Todd E. Dawson, and Michael J. Donoghue. 2004. "Dark and Disturbed: A New Image of Early Angiosperm Ecology." Paleobiology 30 (1): 82–107.
  17. ^ Coiffard, C., B. Gomez, and F. Thevenard. 2007. "Early Cretaceous Angiosperm Invasion of Western Europe and Major Environmental Changes." Annals of Botany 100 (3): 545–53.
  18. ^ Critically endangered Northland lake plant voted NZ’s favourite plant 2024 - Northland Regional Council. (n.d.). Retrieved November 6, 2024, from https://www.nrc.govt.nz/news/2024/november/critically-endangered-northland-lake-plant-voted-nz-s-favourite-plant-2024/
  19. ^ Degraaf, P. (2024, November 5). Ancient, inconspicuous plant voted New Zealand’s favourite. RNZ. https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/532934/ancient-inconspicuous-plant-voted-new-zealand-s-favourite