Tomás Moulian
Tomás Moulian Emparanza (born 21 September 1939) is a Chilean political scientist and sociologist. A Guggenheim Fellow[1] and winner of the National Prize for Humanities and Social Sciences,[2] he is known for being a critic of the socio-economic structure of his country after the dictatorship of Augusto Pinochet. BiographyThe brother of historian Luis Moulian , and uncle of businessman Vasco Moulian , Tomás Moulian studied sociology at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile (PUC), and did postgraduate studies at the University of Louvain (UCLouvain) in Belgium and Paris.[3] He was director of the sociology schools of his alma mater and of University ARCIS. At the latter he also served as Vice Chancellor for Research, and Rector from 2003 to 2006.[4] He was deputy director of the Latin American Social Sciences Institute (FLACSO) in Chile (1990–1991), where he also taught from 1974 to 1994. He has been director of the Paulo Freire Institute of Social Training.[3] He was a member of the Christian Democratic Youth , and during the Popular Unity government he was a member of the MAPU Obrero Campesino.[5] After the return of democracy he identified himself as an independent close to the Communist Party of Chile (PCCh).[6] This same party proclaimed him presidential candidate for the 2005 election,[7] where he finally yielded his selection to the humanist Tomás Hirsch. ThoughtMoulian's works of historical interpretation of the 20th century have been very influential, despite not having the training of a historian. He has published works on the Popular Front, Popular Unity, and political projects of the right. In the same way, his reflections on the process experienced after the end of the Pinochet dictatorship have become prominent.[8] His 1997 essay Chile actual: anatomía de un mito – which won the Santiago Municipal Literature Award the following year and which has had several subsequent editions – is well-known.[8] In this he unveiled the "transvestism" of the political sectors that led the transition towards democracy, who would have allowed the fundamental pillars of the fallen regime to remain.[9] Works
References
|