The ten stages of genocide, formerly the eight stages of genocide, is an academic tool and a policy model which was created by Gregory Stanton, former research professor and founding president of Genocide Watch, in order to explain how genocides occur. The stages of genocide are not linear, and as a result, several of them may occur simultaneously. Stanton's stages are a conceptual model with no real-world sampling for analyzing the events and processes that lead to genocides, and they are also a model for determining preventative measures.
The first stage, classification, involves the division of people into "us" and "them" based on perceived differences such as ethnicity, religion, or nationality. This creates a sense of superiority within the dominant group and dehumanizes the targeted group, laying the groundwork for further atrocities.. The next stages, symbolization and dehumanization, involve the assignment of labels and stereotypes to the targeted group that reinforce their inferior status in the eyes of the perpetrators. This can manifest in the form of hate symbols, propaganda, or incendiary speech that seeks to justify violence against the targeted group. These stages are often followed by organization, polarization, and preparation, where the perpetrators mobilize support for their genocidal campaign, by way of persecution, isolate and marginalize the targeted group, and plan and execute extermination of the members and finally denial of any crimes.[4]
#
Stage
Characteristics
Preventative measures
1
Classification
People are divided into "them and us".
"The main preventive measure at this early stage is to develop universalistic institutions that transcend... divisions."
2
Symbolization
"When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups..."
"To combat symbolization, hate symbols can be legally forbidden as can hate speech."
"One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects, excrement or diseases."
"Local and international leaders should condemn the use of hate speech and make it culturally unacceptable. Leaders who incite genocide should be banned from international travel and have their foreign finances frozen."
5
Organization
"Genocide is always organized... Special army units or militias are often trained and armed..."
"The U.N. should impose arms embargoes on governments and citizens of countries involved in genocidal massacres, and create commissions to investigate violations."
6
Polarization
"Extremists drive the groups apart... Leaders are arrested and murdered... laws erode fundamental civil rights and liberties."
"Prevention may mean security protection for moderate leaders or assistance to human rights groups... Coups d'état by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions."
7
Preparation
"Mass killing is planned. Victims are identified and separated because of their ethnic or religious identity..."
"At this stage, a Genocide Emergency must be declared. Full diplomatic pressure by regional organizations must be invoked, including preparation to intervene to prevent genocide."
"Direct assistance to victim groups, targeted sanctions against persecutors, mobilization of humanitarian assistance or intervention, protection of refugees."
"It is 'extermination' to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human".
"At this stage, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop genocide. Real safe areas or refugee escape corridors should be established with heavily armed international protection."
"The perpetrators... deny that they committed any crimes..."
"The response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts."
Analysis
Other genocide scholars have focused on the cultural and political conditions that lead to genocides. SociologistHelen Fein showed that pre-existing antisemitism was correlated with the percentage of Jews who were killed in European countries during the Holocaust.[5] Political scientists such as Dr. Barbara Harff have identified political characteristics of states that statistically correlate with risk of genocide: prior genocides with impunity, political upheaval, exclusionary ideology, autocracy, closed borders, and massive violations of human rights.[6]
Stanton's model places the risk factors in Harff's analysis into a processual structure. For instance:
Political instability is a characteristic of what Leo Kuper[7] called "divided societies" with deep rifts, as in classification.
Naming and identifying members of the group occurs through symbolization.
Groups targeted by the state are victims of discrimination.
An exclusionary ideology is central to dehumanization.
Autocratic regimes foster the organization of hate groups.
An ethnically polarized elite is characteristic of polarization.
Lack of openness to trade and other influences from outside a state's borders is characteristic of preparation.
Massive violations of human rights are examples of persecution.
Extermination of the group in whole or in part legally constitutes genocide.
Impunity after previous genocides is evidence of denial.
Stanton has suggested that "ultimately, the best antidote to genocide is popular education and the development of social and cultural tolerance for diversity."[3]
^Fein, Helen (1979). Accounting for genocide: Victims and survivors of the Holocaust. New York: Free Press.
^Harff, Barbara (2003). "No Lessons Learned from the Holocaust? Assessing Risks of Genocide and Political Mass Murder since 1955". The American Political Science Review. 97 (1): 57–73. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000522. JSTOR3118221. S2CID54804182.
^Kuper, Leo (1981). Genocide (1982 ed.). New Haven: Yale. p. 58. ISBN0-300-03120-3.
