Template talk:Søren Kierkegaard

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Denmark This template is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Philosophy: Continental / Modern This template is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia. Associated task forces: /  Continental philosophy Modern philosophy

Red link in this template (is it intentional?)

I noticed that the link ("in" or "from" this template) labeled "Thorn in the flesh" actually points to the [article] title "Thorn_in_the_flesh_(Kierkegaard)". The reason the link is red, is because that article [title] -- (with the name "Kierkegaard" in parentheses) -- does not exist.

Then I noticed that there is an article (which does exist) with the title "Thorn in the flesh". I did not (immediately) rush to edit the template, because the idea of doing so seemed so obvious, that I thought (I "figured") that there might well be a good reason why no one else has done so, "so far".

Is there an important difference between the article titles "Thorn in the flesh" and "Thorn_in_the_flesh_(Kierkegaard)" ? If not, then I (or someone) can go ahead and change this template to [instead] just link to [the article about] "Thorn in the flesh". If there is an important difference, then perhaps eventually the article about "Thorn_in_the_flesh_(Kierkegaard)" will exist. (It will be created).

Just an idea, for improvement. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 23:21, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]