Template talk:Pennsylvania House of Representatives info

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: State Legislatures This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts This template is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures. Pennsylvania This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Restructured link formats

I changed the format for the PA House District pages. Now the links use the cardinal numbers instead of the ordinal numbers. This makes the page titles much simpler.

The general format for district pages is now "Pennsylvania House of Representatives, District XXX." I moved the existing pages under the old naming system, so nothing is lost. This allows the use of a succession box template for state representatives (Template:PAHouseSuccession_box) --RedShiftPA (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

House Seal image

User:Frietjes Has constantly removed the house seal from the template, under the claims it makes it too big. But that's not true. Adding the seal simply moves the names over to the left more. There is so much space between the names without the seal, that there is plenty of room to spare. Frietjes, please give a better reason for it to be excluded. Fry1989 ^eh? 20:17, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

what are you talking about? did you actually look at this template before posting this complaint? Frietjes (talk) 15:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I posted on the wrong talk page, but thanks for assuming bad faith. Fry1989 ^eh? 20:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably a good idea to keep the discussion in one place to avoid these problems. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]