I just looked at a half-dozen pages and it seems to be working normally. Nothing's been changed recently wrt the involved templates/modules, so either it's a client-side issue (nothing we can do) or it's THURSDAY and the devs have done something to muck about with things on the mobile side. Primefac (talk) 11:12, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is it a good idea to allow this for normal articles?
I should not be used for articles, because articles do not need a "nutshell" template; that is what the opening paragraph and lead are for. Primefac (talk) 18:55, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Template-protected edit request on 22 April 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Please add an {{{image|}}} parameter to allow custom images be used with this template. In other words,
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit template-protected}} template. There have been a lot of weird opinions about the nut, and I think rather than unilaterally changing it there should at least be some consensus that this is a desired change. Primefac (talk) 19:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac This doesn't change the nutshell. It just allows other icons other than the nutshell to be used on some pages. Some pages would actually benefit from a different icon. AwesomeAasim19:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is kind of my point - I am not sure if people are/would be okay with having a nutshell template that didn't use the nutshell. If people want to have it, great, I'll happily code it in, but I don't want to have to revert in an hour because someone disagreed with it. Primefac (talk) 19:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Template-protected edit request on 11 August 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
