Template talk:Neuro-linguistic programming

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology This template is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. NLP concepts and methods (inactive) This template is within the scope of WikiProject NLP concepts and methods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive. Linguistics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Edits I made

We really need to keep this template limited to NLP specific articles or articles that directly related to NLP. We cannot link things like "Education" because that article was not written with NLP in mind. It's just not directly related enough. --Woohookitty^(meow) 09:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I thought that was sensible, but I've checked a couple of other templates I based this one on, I see you're right. I'll just tweak the formatting to keep the template a little narrower for people with 800 x 600 screens though. It could end up with 1 or 2 more articles added here over time, if any significant and specific NLP articles get added to the category. But that aside, by and large, agreed, edits make sense. FT2 (Talk) 10:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Noam Chomsky

There is zero evidence that Noam Chomsky has had anything to do with NLP, whether as an influence or otherwise. That is bordering on defamation. I removed the link to his name, per WP:BLP violations. Bearian (talk) 21:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sidebar?

This might be better as a side-bar-with-collapsible lists like Template:Feminism sidebar William M. Connolley (talk) 20:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]